Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (19)
- Environmental Law (16)
- Law and Economics (14)
- Banking and Finance Law (13)
- International Law (13)
-
- Criminal Law (11)
- Business Organizations Law (10)
- Contracts (9)
- Intellectual Property Law (9)
- Administrative Law (7)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (7)
- Criminal Procedure (6)
- National Security Law (6)
- President/Executive Department (6)
- Bankruptcy Law (5)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (5)
- Law and Philosophy (5)
- Law and Society (5)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (4)
- Family Law (4)
- Human Rights Law (4)
- International Trade Law (4)
- Law and Race (4)
- Legal History (4)
- Military, War, and Peace (4)
- Securities Law (4)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (3)
- Law and Gender (3)
- Law and Politics (3)
- Keyword
-
- SSRN (23)
- Columbia Law Review (6)
- Publications (6)
- Regulation (5)
- Bankruptcy (4)
-
- Copyright law (4)
- Criminal justice (4)
- Judicial review (4)
- New York Law Journal (4)
- Originalism (4)
- Punishment (4)
- WTO (4)
- Chapter 11 (3)
- Climate change (3)
- Constitutional law (3)
- Criminal law (3)
- Deterrence (3)
- Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (3)
- International law (3)
- Law (3)
- National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (3)
- President (3)
- US Policy (3)
- Administrative law (2)
- Cardozo Law Review (2)
- China (2)
- Clean Air Act (2)
- Clean Water Act (CWA) (2)
- Columbia Journal of Asian Law (2)
- Constitutional theory (2)
Articles 121 - 130 of 130
Full-Text Articles in Law
Rethinking The "Law And Finance" Paradigm, Katharina Pistor
Rethinking The "Law And Finance" Paradigm, Katharina Pistor
Faculty Scholarship
The label "Law and Finance" stands for a body of literature that has dominated policy-making and academic debates for the past decade. The literature has its origin in a series of papers co-authored by Andrei Shleifer, Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes and a cohort of other researchers, including Robert Vishny, Simeon Djankov et al. (hereinafter referred to as LLS et al.). More than ten years after "Law and Finance" was first published, it seems appropriate to step back and consider the contribution this literature has made, but also to point out where it has gone astray and deviated attention from …
Decisional Dignity: Teenage Abortion, Bypass Hearings, And The Misuse Of Law, Carol Sanger
Decisional Dignity: Teenage Abortion, Bypass Hearings, And The Misuse Of Law, Carol Sanger
Faculty Scholarship
How might we think about reforming abortion regulation in a world in which the basic legality of abortion may, as a matter of constitutional law, at last be relatively secure? I have in mind the era just upon us in which the overturn of Roe v. Wadeno longer looms so threateningly over the reproductive rights community in the United States and is no longer necessarily its central concern. There is now a general and seemingly well-founded optimism that under the Obama administration, those who support and rely on reproductive rights will not have to pray nightly for the health …
Ascertaining The Parties' Intentions In Arbitral Design, George A. Bermann
Ascertaining The Parties' Intentions In Arbitral Design, George A. Bermann
Faculty Scholarship
Supreme Court case law teaches us that the federal interest in arbitration does not consist of enforcing agreements to arbitrate according to some sort of abstract or ideal arbitral model, but rather according to the particular arbitral model upon which the parties had agreed. This body of law is driven by the same notions of party autonomy that underlie the law of arbitration generally. That parties may agree to forego access to national courts in favor of arbitration is an initial manifestation of that attitude. By logical extension, the parties also enjoy extraordinary latitude in determining the features that "their" …
Deep Secrecy, David E. Pozen
Deep Secrecy, David E. Pozen
Faculty Scholarship
This Article offers a new way of thinking and talking about government secrecy. In the vast literature on the topic, little attention has been paid to the structure of government secrets, as distinct from their substance or function. Yet these secrets differ systematically depending on how many people know of their existence, what sorts of people know, how much they know, and how soon they know. When a small group of similarly situated officials conceals from outsiders the fact that it is concealing something, the result is a deep secret. When members of the general public understand they are being …
Facial And As-Applied Challenges Under The Roberts Court, Gillian E. Metzger
Facial And As-Applied Challenges Under The Roberts Court, Gillian E. Metzger
Faculty Scholarship
One recurring theme of the Roberts Court's jurisprudence to date is its resistance to facial constitutional challenges and preference for as-applied litigation. On a number of occasions the Court has rejected facial constitutional challenges while reserving the possibility that narrower as-applied claims might succeed. According to the Court, such as-applied claims are "the basic building blocks of constitutional adjudication." This preference for as-applied over facial challenges has surfaced with some frequency, across terms and in contexts involving different constitutional rights, at times garnering support from all the Justices. Moreover, the Roberts Court has advocated the as-applied approach in contexts in …
The Law Of Armed Conflict And Detention Operations In Afghanistan, Matthew C. Waxman
The Law Of Armed Conflict And Detention Operations In Afghanistan, Matthew C. Waxman
Faculty Scholarship
In reflecting on the arc of US and coalition detention operations in Afghanistan, three key issues related to the law of armed conflict stand out: one substantive, one procedural and one policy. The substantive matter – what are the minimum baseline treatment standards required as a matter of international law? – has clarified significantly during the course of operations there, largely as a result of the US Supreme Court's holding in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld. The procedural matter – what adjudicative processes does international law require for determining who may be detained? – eludes consensus and has become more controversial …
Davis V. Fec: The Roberts Court's Continuing Attack On Campaign Finance Reform, Richard Briffault
Davis V. Fec: The Roberts Court's Continuing Attack On Campaign Finance Reform, Richard Briffault
Faculty Scholarship
In Davis v. FEC, decided on the last day of the October 2007 Term, a closely divided Supreme Court invalidated the so-called Millionaires' Amendment, which was a provision added to the Federal Election Campaign Act ("FECA") as part of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act ("BCRA") of 2002 to make it easier for Senate and House candidates to raise private contributions when they run against an opponent who uses a substantial amount of personal wealth to pay for his or her campaign. From the reform perspective, the loss of the Millionaires' Amendment was not of great moment. The Amendment was …
Contract Design And The Structure Of Contractual Intent, Jody S. Kraus, Robert E. Scott
Contract Design And The Structure Of Contractual Intent, Jody S. Kraus, Robert E. Scott
Faculty Scholarship
Modern contract law is governed by a two-stage adjudicative regime – an inheritance of the centuries-old conflict between law and equity. Under this regime, formal contract terms are treated as prima facie provisions that courts can override by invoking equitable doctrines so as to substantially "correct" the parties' contract by realigning it with their contractual intent. This ex post judicial determination of the contractual obligation serves as a fallback mechanism for vindicating the parties' contractual intent whenever the formal contract terms fall short of achieving the parties' purposes. Honoring the contractual intent of the parties is thus the central objective …
Contracting For Innovation: Vertical Disintegration And Interfirm Collaboration, Ronald J. Gilson, Charles F. Sabel, Robert E. Scott
Contracting For Innovation: Vertical Disintegration And Interfirm Collaboration, Ronald J. Gilson, Charles F. Sabel, Robert E. Scott
Faculty Scholarship
Rapidly innovating industries are not behaving the way theory expects. Conventional industrial organization theory predicts that, when parties in a supply chain have to make transaction-specific investments, the risk of opportunism will drive them away from contracts and toward vertical integration. Despite the conventional theory, however, contemporary practice is moving in the other direction. Instead of vertical integration, we observe vertical disintegration in a significant number of industries, as producers recognize that they cannot themselves maintain cutting-edge technology in every field required for the success of their products. In doing this, the parties are developing forms of contracting beyond the …
Selling Originalism, Jamal Greene
Selling Originalism, Jamal Greene
Faculty Scholarship
Justice Scalia has described an originalist approach to interpretation as a prerequisite to faithful application of a written Constitution. If, says he, constitutional judicial review is implicit in the notion that the Constitution is paramount law, as has been settled in this country at least since Marbury v. Madison, then that review must be guided by the ordinary tools of legislative interpretation. In a democracy, serious legislative interpretation requires that judges keep faith with the meaning of the text as understood at the time of enactment, not as desired by those judges or by anyone else who does not, …