Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 841 - 852 of 852

Full-Text Articles in Law

Unicity International Inc. V. Roger Hooban : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals Jan 2008

Unicity International Inc. V. Roger Hooban : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2007– )

Appeal from the Fourth Judicial District Court, in and for Utah County, State of Utah, Honorable Lynn W. Davis Presiding


Unicity International Inc. V. Hooban : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals Jan 2008

Unicity International Inc. V. Hooban : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2007– )

No abstract provided.


State Of Utah V. Donald Dunlap: Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals Jan 2008

State Of Utah V. Donald Dunlap: Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2007– )

Appeal from the Fifth District Court, Washington County, State of Utah, From a Conviction of Driving under the influence, Third Degree before the Honorable James L. Shumate


State Of Utah V. Donald Dunlap: Reply Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals Jan 2008

State Of Utah V. Donald Dunlap: Reply Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2007– )

Appeal from the Fifth District Court, Washington County, State of Utah, From a conviction of driving under the influence, a third degree felony, before the honorable judge James L. Shumate


The State Of Utah V. Don Jacob Setoki : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals Jan 2008

The State Of Utah V. Don Jacob Setoki : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2007– )

Appeal from a conviction of illegal possession of a controlled substance, a third degree felony, in violation of Utah Code section 58-37-8(2)(a)(l), and illegal possession of drug paraphernalia, a class B misdemeanor, in violation of Utah Code section 58-37a- 5. in the Third Judicial District, the Honorable Paul G. Maughan, Presiding.


Utah V. Setoki : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals Jan 2008

Utah V. Setoki : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2007– )

No abstract provided.


State Of Utah V. Victor Clinton : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals Jan 2008

State Of Utah V. Victor Clinton : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2007– )

THIS APPEAL IS FROM A CONVICTION AND SUBSEQUENT SENTENCING TO POSSESSION OF A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE WITHIN A CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, A THIRD-DEGREE FELONY AND ENHANCED PURSUANT TO U.C.A. §58-37-8(2)(E). THE DEFENDANT WAS SENTENCED TO SERVE A SENTENCE OF 1-15 YEARS AT THE UTAH STATE PRISON BY THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR WEBER COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH, THE HONORABLE PAMELA G. HEFFERNAN, PRESIDING. THE DEFENDANT/APPELLANT IS CURRENTLY INCARCERATED AT THE UTAH STATE PRISON.


Julie Ann Olson V. Utah Department Of Health : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals Jan 2008

Julie Ann Olson V. Utah Department Of Health : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2007– )

Interlocutory appeal from an order denying a motion for summary judgment of the Third Judicial District Court, Salt Lake County, the Honorable Joseph C. Fratto presiding


Olson V. Utah Department Of Health : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals Jan 2008

Olson V. Utah Department Of Health : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2007– )

No abstract provided.


Avalanche Or Undue Alarm? An Empirical Study Of Subpoenas Received By The News Media, Ronnell Andersen Jones Jan 2008

Avalanche Or Undue Alarm? An Empirical Study Of Subpoenas Received By The News Media, Ronnell Andersen Jones

Faculty Scholarship

For more than thirty years, proponents and opponents of a federal reporter’s shield law have debated the necessity of a privilege for members of the news media and have disagreed sharply about the frequency with which subpoenas are issued to the press. Most recently, in the wake of several high-profile contempt cases, proponents have pointed to a perceived “avalanche” of subpoenas, while opponents have contended that the receipt of subpoenas by reporters remains very rare. This article summarizes the results of an empirical study on the question. The study gathered data on subpoenas received by daily newspapers and network-affiliated television …


Assessing Interest Groups: A Playing Field Approach, Paul Stancil Jan 2008

Assessing Interest Groups: A Playing Field Approach, Paul Stancil

Faculty Scholarship

Despite general public antipathy toward the political influence exerted by corporations, industries, and other special interests, prescriptive applications of interest group theory have not gained much traction. This is primarily a function of previous commentators' inability to solve two difficult and related problems: (1) development of a consensus normative framework in which to apply interest group theory; and (2) development of a meaningful, objective, and workable approach to measuring interest group dynamics in the real world. The article offers solutions to both.

The article first proposes workably competitive pluralism as a norm to which the regulatory process should aspire in …


Indeterminacy And The Establishment Clause, Frederick Mark Gedicks Jan 2008

Indeterminacy And The Establishment Clause, Frederick Mark Gedicks

Faculty Scholarship

Prepared for a symposium on Kent Greenawalt, 2 Religion and the Constitution: Establishment and Fairness (Princeton, 2008), this essay responds to Professor Greenawalt's criticism of my argument in The Rhetoric of Church and State (Duke, 1995), that Establishment Clause doctrine is the incoherent residue of conflicting rhetorical discourses of religious communitarianism and secular individualism. Not only are the Supreme Court's Establishment Clause decisions inconsistent at the margins, but there is no identifiable core meaning that can account for these decisions. The essay concludes that, contra Greenawalt, the thesis of conflicting rhetorical discourses remains the most powerful explanation of the Court's …