Law Commons^™

Act Up, Fight Back, Fight Aids! The Legacy Of Act Up’S Policies And Actions From 1987-1994, Nathan H. Madson

Nathan H Madson

The AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power (ACT UP) was founded in 1987 after a speech by Larry Kramer implored people to address the widespread destruction and deaths caused by HIV/AIDS. Since its founding, ACT UP has worked to improve the public’s awareness of the disease and to push for legislation that not only protected People With AIDS (PWAs), but also improved their access to medications and treatments. The way in which ACT UP achieved these goals, however, has provided a framework for other marginalized groups to make a similar impact. Some of the tools ACT UP used include: zaps, political …

The Contradictory Stance On Jury Nullification, Kenneth J. Duvall

Kenneth J Duvall

Arguments about jury nullification in both courts and academia proceed under the assumption that either proponents and opponents of nullification could decisively carry the day. But as current Supreme Court law stands, nullification is at once prohibited and protected. This Article shines a light on the uneasy, confusing compromise in the doctrine, and finds that the two ways out of the dilemma—fully embracing nullification, or rejecting it—are equally taboo to the American legal mind. In Part I, this Article briefly explains the contested history of nullification. In Part II, it examines modern courts’ intermittent recognition of nullification. Part III then …

Stewardship And Dominium: How Disparate Conceptions Of Ownership Influence Possession Doctrines, Martin Hirschprung

martin hirschprung

The law is ambiguous regarding the level and extent of possession necessary to effect ownership. It can be argued that one’s conception of the nature of ownership influences this standard of possession. I further argue that the application of the concept of stewardship to questions of possession will aid in resolving the disputes between museums and indigenous groups regarding cultural artifacts. In order to demonstrate the relationship between one’s conception of ownership and its attendant standard of possession, it is useful to contrast different legal definitions of ownership, particularly the Roman concept of dominium, with a religious model of stewardship …

The Unity Thesis: How Positivism Distorts Constitutional Argument, John Lunstroth

John Lunstroth

Democracy and civil rights are distorted and polarizing ideas that pit the rich against the poor, and should be abandoned in favor of an emphasis on the common good. To reach that conclusion I argue the US Constitution is and has always been designed to protect the wealth of the ruling class. All political associations or states have this as a central idea. My argument rests on a unique jurisprudential principle, the Unity Thesis. The main school of legal theory, positivism (the science of law) is based on the idea law is always separate from morals. I argue the opposite, …

The Constitutional Referendum Of 1866: Andrew Johnson And The Original Meaning Of The Privileges Or Immunities Clause, Kurt T. Lash

Kurt T. Lash

Fourteenth Amendment scholars commonly assume that there is a relative silence in the historical record regarding public discussion of the proposed Amendment. In fact there was rich and extended public debate regarding the meaning of the Section One of the Amendment and the need to protect the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States. These robust debates did not take place in state legislative assemblies, but in the campaign speeches, newspaper editorials and public documents accompanying the mid-term elections of 1866. Both Democrats and Republicans made the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment a central part of their party’s …

Regulating From Typewriters In An Internet Age: The Development & Regulation Of Mass Media Usage In Presidential Campaigns, Anthony J. King

Anthony J. King

The American election process has become a misleading process of campaign promises and self-promotion, thus diluting its primary and most fundamental purpose. This discrepancy can be traced to three primary groups; (1) the candidates, who supplied the motive; (2) the mass media, who supplied the means; and (3) the electorate, who so far have allowed it to happen. Seeking to remedy the situation lawmakers have turned to regulations of the media in attempt to assure fairness and nurture the marketplace of ideas. These numerous attempts at fairness have been met with a mixed reception and mixed results leading to questions …

Like A Glass Slipper On Step-Sister, How The One-Ring Rules Them All At Trial, Cathren Page

Cathren Page

The literary concept of an endowed object can weave a thread of narrative continuity throughout a trial and resonates in the mind of the judge or juror. In literature, an endowed object is a material object that reverberates with symbolic significance throughout the story. The object can develop the theme, character, and emotions. Examples include Cinderella’s glass slipper, the one-ring, the handkerchief in Othello, and the mocking jay pin from The Hunger Games. Endowed objects have been persuasive symbols in famous trials as well. Endowed objects include the glove in the O.J. Simpson murder trial and John Wilkes Booth’s boot …

Grounding Into A Double Standard: Understanding & Repealing The Curt Flood Act, Brett J. Butz

Brett J Butz

This article calls for an end to Major League Baseball’s statutory exemption from antitrust regulation for acts that are considered part of the “business of baseball.” The Curt Flood Act, as it is colloquially called, was a Congressional mistake; the product years of faulty analysis and absurd holdings by the Supreme Court. This article will explain how the exemption came to fruition, outline the various problems with its inception, and conclude by proposing that Major League Baseball should be subject to antitrust regulations, just like all other professional sports leagues.

Admissibility Of Dna Evidence: Italy Under Attack, Adina Rosenfeld

Adina Rosenfeld

The purpose of this paper is to compare the differences and similarities in the evidentiary rules for DNA in Italy and in the United States in the light of their two different legal traditions. This note will compare American and Italian rules of evidence and procedure for the admissibility of DNA in criminal trials and analyze the most relevant differences between the two systems. Based on this comparison, the note will argue that Amanda Knox would not have been convicted of murdering her roommate in American lower court because the DNA evidence would not have been admissible. In Italy, Knox …

Ain’T I A Woman, Too?: The Thirteenth Amendment, In Defense Of Incarcerated Women’S Reproductive Rights, Alexandria Gutierrez

Alexandria Gutierrez

In her memoir, Harriet Ann Jacobs highlights the unique impact slavery had on women. The physical dominion imposed upon female slaves included both internal and external bodily control. Beyond sexual exploitation, the bodies of female slaves were used for a type of labor for which their male counterparts were not capable: reproduction. Forced pregnancy in the slavery context was a tragic and violative experience affecting women physically, psychologically, and emotionally. Long after the ratification of the Thirteenth Amendment, slavery-like practices lived on through social, political, and economic mechanisms. In the penological context, peonage laws, penal plantations, and chain gangs were …

Advising Presidents: Robert H. Jackson And The Problem Of Dirty Hands, William Casto

William Casto

ABSTRACT Not so long ago, legal advice given to President George W. Bush regarding torture sparked considerable controversy, and discussions were frequently distorted by rancorous partisanship. The present essay uses advice given to President Franklin Roosevelt by Attorney General, later Justice, Robert Jackson as a laboratory for exploring the ethical dimensions of the advisory relationship. In particular, this essay examines the president’s unilateral decision in 1940 to transfer fifty destroyers to the British. That Destroyer Deal is distant in time and is now relatively uncontroversial. Today, everyone agrees with the substantive policy of helping Great Britain against Nazi Germany. The …

What We Can Learn About The Art Of Persuasive From Candidate Abraham Lincoln: A Rhetorical Analysis Of The Three Speeches That Propelled Lincoln Into The Presidency, Michael W. Loudenslager

Michael W. Loudenslager

Abraham Lincoln is renowned as an impressive orator and writer, and historians have long studied his speeches and writings. However, commentators largely have not focused upon the persuasive techniques utilized by Lincoln in his speeches. Lincoln was an experienced litigator, and over the course of his legal career, he tried a voluminous number of cases, was involved in several appeals before the United States Supreme Court, and argued numerous times before the Illinois Supreme Court. These experiences helped Lincoln cultivate various manners of persuading judges and juries. Similarly, one major goal of Lincoln’s speeches, as with any politician, was to …

Mistaken Assumptions: The Roots Of Stanford V. Roche In Post-War Government Patent Policy, Sean M. O'Connor

Sean M. O'Connor

The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 was built on a mistaken assumption that “contractors”—recipients of federal funding—were securing assignments of inventions from their employees. The roots of this assumption go back to a 1947 Attorney General report on government patent policy that glossed over its own detailed finding that universities were in many cases not doing so. Because other types of contractors, including private firms and nonprofit research institutions, generally were securing title, the report concluded that “most” contractors were doing so. The report itself was the culmination of a century of confusing and conflicting legal developments with regard to both …

Assent Is Not An Element Of Contract Formation, Val D. Ricks

Val D. Ricks

Nearly everyone describes assent as an element of the law of contract formation. But it is not an element. Contract formation requires promise and consideration. Consideration requires exchange. Exchange implies assent. So though it is possible to have assent without consideration, it is impossible to have consideration without assent. As long as consideration is required, then, a separate requirement of assent is duplicative (and superfluous). The Restatement (Second) waffled on this issue. This paper shows how assent doctrines became part of contract law in the early 1800s, and why, and what role those doctrines now play. It is a limited …

The Shifting Interpretations Of Interpol’S Article Three, Kyle Rene

Kyle Rene

Article Three of INTERPOL’s Constitution prohibits INTERPOL from undertaking “any intervention or activities of a political, military, religious or racial character.” Notwithstanding this prohibition, INTERPOL itself has taken an active role in pursing the perpetrators of one of the most politically, religiously, and racially charged forms of crime, terrorism. The following Note discusses how INTERPOL has rationalized its pursuit of terrorists in light of Article Three’s mandate. The Note concludes by reassessing the value of Article Three, showing how, although Article Three has been interpreted to afford INTERPOL the latitude to pursue terrorists, it nonetheless represents an effective means of …

How The Poor Got Cut Out Of Banking, Mehrsa Baradaran

Mehrsa Baradaran

The United States currently has two banking systems—one for the rich, one for the poor. It wasn’t always this way. Throughout U.S. history, the government has enlisted certain banking institutions to serve the needs of the poor and offer low cost credit to enable low-income Americans to escape poverty. Credit unions, savings and loans and Morris Banks are three prominent examples of government-supported institutions with a specific focus of helping the poor. Unfortunately, these institutions are no longer fulfilling their missions and high-cost, usurious, and sometimes predatory check-cashers and payday lenders have quickly filled the void. These fringe banks do …

An Historical Reassessment Of Full Faith And Credit, Jeffrey M. Schmitt

Jeffrey M Schmitt

The Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”) has generated a great deal of academic debate over Congress’s power under the Full Faith and Credit Clause. Although modern scholars have advanced a range of different interpretations, recent scholarship has argued that the Clause was originally understood to have granted Congress virtually unlimited power to prescribe how state acts and judgments would apply in other states. Under this prevailing historical view, DOMA would thus be consistent with the original meaning of the Full Faith and Credit Clause.

This Article offers a new account of the historical understanding of the Full Faith and Credit …

Genealogies Of Risk: Searching For Safety, 1930s-1970s, William Boyd

William Boyd

Health, safety, and environmental regulation in the United States is saturated with risk thinking. It was not always so, and it may not be so in the future. But today, the formal, quantitative approach to risk provides much of the basis for regulation in these fields, a development that seems quite natural, even necessary. This particular approach, while it drew on conceptual and technical developments that had been underway for decades, achieved prominence during a specific, and relatively short timeframe; roughly, between the mid 1970s and the early 1980s—a time of hard looks and regulatory reform. Prior to this time, …

Liberalism Unsettled: Freedom And Status In The Promise Of Marriage, Anat Rosenberg

Anat Rosenberg

This paper examines the tension between freedom and subjection under liberalism; but, rather than emphasize either side of the binary, my aim is to articulate the terms of duality, and provide an account of the social life of liberal thought. To do so, I revisit the nineteenth-century promise of marriage. The promise of marriage represented a conceptual fusion of the liberal ideals of contract and sentiment, central to rise of the free market and the conjugal family, and of the counterforces of status – particularly gender and class. While the former marshaled the hope of free will as a new …

Unjustifiable Expectations: Laying To Rest The Ghosts Of Allotment-Era Settlers, Ann E. Tweedy

Ann E. Tweedy

When the Supreme Court decides whether a tribe has jurisdiction over non-members on its reservation or addresses the related issue of reservation diminishment, it often refers implicitly or explicitly to the non-Indians’ justifiable expectations. The non-Indians’ assumed expectations arise from the fact that, when Congress opened up reservations to non-Indians during the allotment era, its assumption, and presumably that of non-Indians who purchased lands on reservations during that period, was that the reservations would disappear due to the federal government’s assimilationist policies, along with the tribes who governed them. To refute the idea that such non-Indian expectations were justifiable, I …

The Efficient Secret: How America Nearly Adopted A Parliamentary System, And Why It Should Have Done So, F. H. Buckley

F. H. Buckley

The American presidential system, with its separation of powers, plausibly imposes enormous costs on the economy without compensating gains, as seen in the current gridlock over the debt crisis. Modern parliamentary systems of government, such as those in Britain and Canada, seem to handle such problems more efficiently. Regretfully, however, the principle of separationism has been extended in Supreme Court decisions and in the Senate filibuster, in part because of the mistaken idea that this is what the Founders intended. A close examination of the preferences of the delegates to the Philadelphia Convention of 1787 tells a very different story. …

The Effect Of The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act On Collaborative Research, N. Scott Pierce

N. Scott Pierce

Requirement under subsection 102(f) of Title 35 of the United States Code that a person “himself invent the subject matter sought to be patented” has been removed by the Leahy-Smith American Invents Act (AIA) of 2011. At least one commentator proposes amending the new Act to add back this provision in order to prevent unauthorized copiers from patenting obvious variants of non-public inventions derived from an original inventor. However, judicial precedent generally does not sanction obviousness considerations under subsection 102(f). If an equivalent to subsection 102(f) is incorporated into the AIA that does block obvious variants of derived subject matter, …

"Pride Ignorance And Knavery": James Madison's Formative Experiences With Religious Establishments, Andy G. Olree

Andy G Olree

Judicial interpretations of the First Amendment’s religion clauses have purported to rely heavily on the history of the American Founding era. Today, it seems no Founder carries more weight in religion clause opinions than James Madison, a seminal figure the Supreme Court has repeatedly credited as “the leading architect of the religion clauses of the First Amendment”—most recently in January 2012, as it relied heavily on Madison’s views in deciding the Hosanna-Tabor case. But courts citing Madison have tended to focus on the short period beginning with his “Memorial and Remonstrance” in 1785 and ending with the ratification of the …

The Constitution, Citizenship, And Corporations – A Critical Look At Citizens United V. Fec, P M Vasudev

Palladam M Vasudev

“Associations of citizens” is a phrase the US Supreme Court used in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010) to refer to corporations. This notion was, apparently, an important element in shaping the Supreme Court’s judgment that permitted corporations to participate in the democratic process through campaign funding. Presumably, the “citizens” the court had in mind are the shareholders of corporations. Treating corporations as citizens in the collective, the Supreme Court upheld their political rights, and there is evidence of disquiet with the decision in Citizens United. My article examines the Supreme Court’s characterization of corporations as associations of citizens …

Common Ownership & Equality Of Autonomy, Anna Di Robilant

anna di robilant

In recent years, common ownership is enjoying unprecedented favor among policy-makers and citizens. Conservation land trusts, affordable housing cooperatives, community gardens and neighborhood-managed parks are spreading in U.S. cities. These common ownership regimes are seen as yielding a variety of benefits, such as “community”, i.e. more democratic and responsible management of resources, or “efficiency”, i.e. more efficient use of scarce natural resources. This article makes two contributions to the “new commons” literature. First, it re-orients the normative focus of the debate. It argues that common ownership regimes can help foster greater “equality of autonomy.” By “equality of autonomy”, I mean …

Legitimating Revolt: Classical Legal Thought And The Birth Of Political Islam, Andrew V. Moshirnia

Andrew V Moshirnia

Scholars typically identify the Tobacco Movement in Nineteenth-Century Iran as the key moment when the ulama, or Muslim clergy, emerged as a political force. While theorists have suggested that religious reform or the Marxist class struggle caused this event, these explanations fail to account for the Movement’s emphasis on the will of the individual, the need for systematized laws, and the involvement of women. These attributes are hallmarks of Classical Legal Thought, the dominant legal consciousness of the era. Two key reformers, Sayyid Jamal ad-Din (“Afghani”) and Mirza Malkum Khan (“Malcom”), used the language of Classical Legal Thought in painting …

To Testify Or Not To Testify: The Dilemma Facing Children With Multiple Cases Before The Same Judge In Delinquency Court., Katherine I. Puzone

Katherine I. Puzone

In Juvenile Court, children often have more than one case pending, especially children living in group foster homes and those at alternative schools. In many jurisdictions, all of a child’s cases are assigned to the same judge. If the child is arrested at a later time, the new case is also assigned to the same judge. That means that if a child exercises her right to go to trial in each case, the same judge will hear every case. If they are set for trial on the same day, and they often are, the judge will hear each case in …

Screaming To Be Heard: Black Feminism And The Fight For A Voice From The 1950s - 1970s, Preston D. Mitchum

Preston D. Mitchum

No abstract provided.

Screaming To Be Heard: Black Feminism And The Fight For A Voice From The 1950s - 1970s, Preston D. Mitchum

Preston D. Mitchum

No abstract provided.

Screaming To Be Heard: Black Feminism And The Fight For A Voice From The 1950s - 1970s, Preston D. Mitchum

Preston D. Mitchum

No abstract provided.