Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- American University Washington College of Law (9)
- University of Colorado Law School (6)
- William & Mary Law School (6)
- Roger Williams University (5)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3)
-
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (2)
- Barry University School of Law (1)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Dordt University (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of Connecticut (1)
- West Chester University (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (9)
- Faculty Publications (6)
- Publications (6)
- Faculty Scholarship (4)
- All Faculty Scholarship (3)
-
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (3)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (3)
- Criminal Justice Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Publications & Other Works (1)
- Faculty Work Comprehensive List (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- Honors Scholar Theses (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Law School Blogs (1)
- School of Law Conferences, Lectures & Events (1)
- Supreme Court Preview (1)
Articles 31 - 43 of 43
Full-Text Articles in Law
Judicial Lobbying At The Wto: The Debate Over The Use Of Amicus Curiae Briefs And The U.S. Experience, Padideh Ala'i
Judicial Lobbying At The Wto: The Debate Over The Use Of Amicus Curiae Briefs And The U.S. Experience, Padideh Ala'i
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
The continuing debate over the use of amicus curiae briefs at the World Trade Organization (“WTO”) raises interesting questions about the influence of the U.S. legal system on the WTO dispute settlement process. Specifically, it brings to the surface differences between legal cultures and the fact that the U.S. legal culture with its emphasis on procedure is not readily transferable to the WTO. Comparing the controversy regarding the use of amicus curiae briefs before WTO Panels and the Appellate Body with the history and evolution of the institution of amicus curiae before the U.S. Supreme Court may help explain the …
Authorizing Interpretation, Pierre Schlag
Watts: The Decline Of The Jury, William T. Pizzi
Playing Defense, Robert F. Nagel
Playing Defense, Robert F. Nagel
Publications
Noting that the Romer opinion condemns the motives behind Amendment 2 without pausing even briefly to examine the social context in which it was enacted, Professor Nagel describes the decision as a model of the intolerant impulse in action. He traces this impulse to the Justices' unwillingness to examine their own role--and that of the rest of the constitutional law establishment--in creating the underlying conditions that produced Amendment 2.
In order to identify those conditions, Professor Nagel analyzes the primary document used by Colorado for Family Values during its campaign on behalf of the initiative. He argues that this document …
Government Lawyers And The New Deal, Neal Devins
Government Lawyers And The New Deal, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Most Dangerous Justice: The Supreme Court At The Bar Of Mathematics, Paul H. Edelman, Jim Chen
The Most Dangerous Justice: The Supreme Court At The Bar Of Mathematics, Paul H. Edelman, Jim Chen
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
We analyze the relative voting power of the Justices based upon Supreme Court decisions during October Term 1994 and October Term 1995. We take two approaches, both based on ideas derived from cooperative game theory. One of the measures we use has been used in connection with voting rights cases. After naming the Most Dangerous Justice, we conclude by identifying and explaining the inverse relationship between seniority and voting power.
Advocacy And Scholarship, Paul F. Campos
Advocacy And Scholarship, Paul F. Campos
Publications
The apex of American legal thought is embodied in two types of writings: the federal appellate opinion and the law review article. In this Article, the author criticizes the whole enterprise of doctrinal constitutional law scholarship, using a recent U.S. Supreme Court case and a Harvard Law Review article as quintessential examples of the dominant genre. In a rhetorical tour de force, the author argues that most of modern constitutional scholarship is really advocacy in the guise of scholarship. Such an approach to legal scholarship may have some merit as a strategic move towards a political end; however, it has …
Section 1: Moot Court: Nixon V. United States, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 1: Moot Court: Nixon V. United States, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Liberals And Balancing, Robert F. Nagel
Book Review Of Clement Haynsworth, The Senate, And The Supreme Court, Davison M. Douglas
Book Review Of Clement Haynsworth, The Senate, And The Supreme Court, Davison M. Douglas
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Enduring Example Of John Marshall Harlan: "Virtue As Practice" In The Supreme Court, William W. Van Alstyne
The Enduring Example Of John Marshall Harlan: "Virtue As Practice" In The Supreme Court, William W. Van Alstyne
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
O'Connor: A Dual Role - An Introduction, Stephen Wermiel
O'Connor: A Dual Role - An Introduction, Stephen Wermiel
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.
Appointment Controversies And The Supreme Court, Stephen Wermiel
Appointment Controversies And The Supreme Court, Stephen Wermiel
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.