Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Universitas Indonesia (82)
- University of Richmond (49)
- Roger Williams University (37)
- St. Mary's University (21)
- University of Baltimore Law (20)
-
- Southern Methodist University (15)
- William & Mary Law School (14)
- Cleveland State University (12)
- Seattle University School of Law (12)
- University of Washington School of Law (11)
- St. John's University School of Law (10)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (9)
- University of the District of Columbia School of Law (9)
- Brooklyn Law School (8)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (8)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (7)
- Brigham Young University Law School (6)
- DePaul University (6)
- Fordham Law School (5)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (5)
- University of Michigan Law School (5)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (5)
- Columbia Law School (4)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (4)
- Notre Dame Law School (4)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (4)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- Pace University (2)
- Stephen F. Austin State University (2)
- Keyword
-
- Ohio (10)
- Federalism (9)
- State law; State administrative decision (9)
- COVID-19 (8)
- District of Columbia (7)
-
- Government (7)
- Legislation (6)
- Pandemic (6)
- Race (6)
- Separation of powers (6)
- Texas (6)
- Constitutional Law (5)
- Copyright (5)
- Court (5)
- D.C. Council (5)
- Education (5)
- Justice (5)
- Legal (5)
- Local government (5)
- Abortion (4)
- Access (4)
- Community (4)
- Courts (4)
- Criminal (4)
- Investment (4)
- Regulation (4)
- Sovereignty (4)
- State government (4)
- Statutory interpretation (4)
- Transparency (4)
- Publication
-
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (82)
- University of Richmond Law Review (46)
- Roger Williams University Law Review (29)
- University of Baltimore Law Forum (20)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (16)
-
- SMU Annual Texas Survey (14)
- Faculty Scholarship (10)
- Seattle University Law Review (10)
- Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions (9)
- Washington Law Review (9)
- Cleveland State Law Review (7)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (7)
- D.C. Council Testimony (6)
- DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal (6)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (6)
- St. John's Law Review (6)
- Arkansas Law Review (5)
- Nevada Law Journal (5)
- Virginia Coastal Policy Center (5)
- All Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Articles (4)
- BYU Law Review (4)
- Faculty Publications (4)
- Journal of Law and Health (4)
- Journal of Law and Policy (4)
- The Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Race and Social Justice (4)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (3)
- Fordham Law Review (3)
- Law Student Publications (3)
- Northwestern University Law Review (3)
- Publication Type
Articles 421 - 432 of 432
Full-Text Articles in Law
State V. Hampton-Boyd, 253 A.3d 418 (R.I. 2021, Brian W. Murphy
State V. Hampton-Boyd, 253 A.3d 418 (R.I. 2021, Brian W. Murphy
Roger Williams University Law Review
No abstract provided.
State V. Michaud, 251 A.3d 9 (Ri 2021)., Blair Robinson
State V. Michaud, 251 A.3d 9 (Ri 2021)., Blair Robinson
Roger Williams University Law Review
No abstract provided.
State V. Jones, 242 A.3d 47 (R.I. 2020)., Elizabeth Gravelle
State V. Jones, 242 A.3d 47 (R.I. 2020)., Elizabeth Gravelle
Roger Williams University Law Review
No abstract provided.
State V. Reisner, 253 A.3d 1273 (R.I. 2021), David Tice
State V. Reisner, 253 A.3d 1273 (R.I. 2021), David Tice
Roger Williams University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Ret. Bd. Of The Emples. Ret. Sys. Of R.I. V. Randall, 249 A.3d 629 (R.I. 2021), Yee Yee Myint
The Ret. Bd. Of The Emples. Ret. Sys. Of R.I. V. Randall, 249 A.3d 629 (R.I. 2021), Yee Yee Myint
Roger Williams University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Butler V. Gavek, 245 A.3d 750 (R.I. 2021), David Braga
Butler V. Gavek, 245 A.3d 750 (R.I. 2021), David Braga
Roger Williams University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Epic Enters. V. 10 Brown & Howard Wharf Condo. Ass’N, 253 A.3d 383 (R.I. 2021), Matthew Lewicki
Epic Enters. V. 10 Brown & Howard Wharf Condo. Ass’N, 253 A.3d 383 (R.I. 2021), Matthew Lewicki
Roger Williams University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Laprocina V. Lourie, 250 A.3d 1281 (R.I. 2021), Jeffrey Prystowsky
Laprocina V. Lourie, 250 A.3d 1281 (R.I. 2021), Jeffrey Prystowsky
Roger Williams University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Beagan V. Rhode Island Department Of Labor And Training, 253 A.3d 858 (R.I. 2021), Candace Quinn
Beagan V. Rhode Island Department Of Labor And Training, 253 A.3d 858 (R.I. 2021), Candace Quinn
Roger Williams University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Koback V. Municipal Employees’ Retirement System Of R.I., 252 A.3d 1247 (R.I. 2021), Morgan E. Hedly
Koback V. Municipal Employees’ Retirement System Of R.I., 252 A.3d 1247 (R.I. 2021), Morgan E. Hedly
Roger Williams University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The New Abortion Battleground, David S. Cohen, Greer Donley, Rachel Rebouché
The New Abortion Battleground, David S. Cohen, Greer Donley, Rachel Rebouché
Articles
This Article examines the paradigm shift that is occurring now that the Supreme Court has overturned Roe v. Wade. Returning abortion law to the states has spawned perplexing legal conflicts across state borders and between states and the federal government. This article emphasizes how these issues intersect with innovations in the delivery of abortion, which can now occur entirely online and transcend state boundaries. The interjurisdictional abortion wars are coming, and this Article is the first to provide the roadmap for the immediate aftermath of Roe’s reversal and what lies ahead.
Judges and scholars, and most recently the Supreme …
Re-Thinking Strategy After Roe, David S. Cohen, Greer Donley, Rachel Rebouché
Re-Thinking Strategy After Roe, David S. Cohen, Greer Donley, Rachel Rebouché
Articles
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization overturns nearly fifty years of precedent and radically changes abortion law, throwing both sides of the debate into uncharted territory. This essay, published in the immediate aftermath of Dobbs, offers some initial thoughts about what the changed legal landscape means for abortion rights legal advocacy. Our focus in recent writings has been to identify concrete measures federal and state actors can take to secure abortion access after Dobbs. Here, we investigate a more overarching concern: what fundamental values and strategies should govern the abortion rights movement going …