Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Euclid Proviso, Ezra Rosser
The Euclid Proviso, Ezra Rosser
Washington Law Review
This Article argues that the Euclid Proviso, which allows regional concerns to trump local zoning when required by the general welfare, should play a larger role in zoning’s second century. Traditional zoning operates to severely limit the construction of additional housing. This locks in the advantages of homeowners but at tremendous cost, primarily in the form of unaffordable housing, to those who would like to join the community. State preemption of local zoning defies traditional categorization; it is at once both radically destabilizing and market responsive. But, given the ways in which zoning is a foundational part of the racial …
Zoning—Judicial Enforcement Of The Duty To Serve The Regional Welfare In Zoning Decisions—Save V. City Of Bothell, 89 Wn. 2d 862, 576 P.2d 401 (1978), Michael H. Rorick
Zoning—Judicial Enforcement Of The Duty To Serve The Regional Welfare In Zoning Decisions—Save V. City Of Bothell, 89 Wn. 2d 862, 576 P.2d 401 (1978), Michael H. Rorick
Washington Law Review
After briefly noting the background of relevant Washington law, Part I of this note analyzes the SAVE court's reasoning to reveal indications of an underlying interventionism in its review of the rezone. Part II assesses the problems of such judicial intervention, first in the exclusionary zoning cases relied upon by the SAVE court for its regional welfare standard, and then in the context of zoning actions with the kind of extralocal environmental impacts presented by SAVE. Finally, arguments favoring increased judicial intervention are presented. The note concludes that there are both practical and doctrinal justifications for heightened judicial scrutiny of …
Zoning—Rezones: New Standards For Governing Bodies—Parkridge V. City Of Seattle, 89 Wn. 2d 454, 573 P.2d 359 (1978), Alice L. Hearst
Zoning—Rezones: New Standards For Governing Bodies—Parkridge V. City Of Seattle, 89 Wn. 2d 454, 573 P.2d 359 (1978), Alice L. Hearst
Washington Law Review
This note examines four aspects of rezoning decisions addressed by the Parkridge court: the policy basis upon which rezoning actions may legitimately be grounded; the quantum of evidence necessary to support a rezoning decision;" the allocation of the burden of proof in rezoning actions; and the presumption of validity, if any, accorded local rezoning decisions.