Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Euclid Proviso, Ezra Rosser
The Euclid Proviso, Ezra Rosser
Washington Law Review
This Article argues that the Euclid Proviso, which allows regional concerns to trump local zoning when required by the general welfare, should play a larger role in zoning’s second century. Traditional zoning operates to severely limit the construction of additional housing. This locks in the advantages of homeowners but at tremendous cost, primarily in the form of unaffordable housing, to those who would like to join the community. State preemption of local zoning defies traditional categorization; it is at once both radically destabilizing and market responsive. But, given the ways in which zoning is a foundational part of the racial …
Zoning—Judicial Enforcement Of The Duty To Serve The Regional Welfare In Zoning Decisions—Save V. City Of Bothell, 89 Wn. 2d 862, 576 P.2d 401 (1978), Michael H. Rorick
Zoning—Judicial Enforcement Of The Duty To Serve The Regional Welfare In Zoning Decisions—Save V. City Of Bothell, 89 Wn. 2d 862, 576 P.2d 401 (1978), Michael H. Rorick
Washington Law Review
After briefly noting the background of relevant Washington law, Part I of this note analyzes the SAVE court's reasoning to reveal indications of an underlying interventionism in its review of the rezone. Part II assesses the problems of such judicial intervention, first in the exclusionary zoning cases relied upon by the SAVE court for its regional welfare standard, and then in the context of zoning actions with the kind of extralocal environmental impacts presented by SAVE. Finally, arguments favoring increased judicial intervention are presented. The note concludes that there are both practical and doctrinal justifications for heightened judicial scrutiny of …
Zoning—Rezones: New Standards For Governing Bodies—Parkridge V. City Of Seattle, 89 Wn. 2d 454, 573 P.2d 359 (1978), Alice L. Hearst
Zoning—Rezones: New Standards For Governing Bodies—Parkridge V. City Of Seattle, 89 Wn. 2d 454, 573 P.2d 359 (1978), Alice L. Hearst
Washington Law Review
This note examines four aspects of rezoning decisions addressed by the Parkridge court: the policy basis upon which rezoning actions may legitimately be grounded; the quantum of evidence necessary to support a rezoning decision;" the allocation of the burden of proof in rezoning actions; and the presumption of validity, if any, accorded local rezoning decisions.
Jurisdiction To Zone Indian Reservations, Robert D. Wilson-Hoss
Jurisdiction To Zone Indian Reservations, Robert D. Wilson-Hoss
Washington Law Review
This comment will examine one of the most critical aspects of the civil jurisdiction issue—tribal jurisdiction to exercise land use planning and zoning control. With such jurisdiction, a tribe may regulate or prohibit the development of reservation lands, and thus exercise a measure of control over the future of its reservation. Without zoning jurisdiction, most tribes would be forced to submit to the judgments of non-Indians about the uses of reservation lands. An introduction to the history and patterns of land ownership on Indian reservations is important to an understanding of the clashes between Indian and non-Indian reservation residents. Equally …
Constitutional Law—Zoning For Single-"Family" Dwellings Is Not Denial Of Equal Protection To Unrelated Persons—Village Of Belle Terre V. Boraas, 416 U.S. 1 (1974), Albert G. Marquis
Constitutional Law—Zoning For Single-"Family" Dwellings Is Not Denial Of Equal Protection To Unrelated Persons—Village Of Belle Terre V. Boraas, 416 U.S. 1 (1974), Albert G. Marquis
Washington Law Review
Six unrelated persons resided in a single dwelling in Belle Terre, New York, in violation of the Village's zoning ordinance. The village is zoned exclusively for one-family dwellings; "family" is defined by the ordinance as: One or more persons related by blood, adoption or marriage, living and cooking together as a single housekeeping unit [or] a number of persons but not exceeding two (2) living and cooking together as a single housekeeping unit though not related by blood, adoption, or marriage shall be deemed to constitute a family. The lessors of the residence were served with notice that failure of …