Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions (807)
- Cleveland State Law Review (32)
- Michigan Law Review (20)
- Journal of Law and Health (6)
- Articles (3)
-
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (2)
- Et Cetera (2)
- University of Cincinnati Law Review (2)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Fracking, Water Quality and Public Health: Examining Current Laws and Regulations (March 20) (1)
- IUSTITIA (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Law Faculty Reports and Comments (1)
- Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law (1)
- Patricia E. Salkin (1)
- Scholarly Works (1)
- Shale Plays in the Intermountain West: Legal and Policy Issues (November 12) (1)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (1)
- Touro Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 841 - 870 of 886
Full-Text Articles in Law
Appeal No. 0083: Murphy Oil Company V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0083: Murphy Oil Company V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
No abstract provided.
Appeal No. 0077: Universal Exploration, Inc. V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0077: Universal Exploration, Inc. V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 83-75
Appeal No. 0079: Wray Petroleum Corporation V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0079: Wray Petroleum Corporation V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 83-77
Appeal No. 0082: R & M Well Service, Inc. V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0082: R & M Well Service, Inc. V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 83-90
Appeal No. 0071: The Toledo Edison Company V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0071: The Toledo Edison Company V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 83-67
Appeal No. 0064: Trenton Energy, Inc. V. Andrew G. Skalkos, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0064: Trenton Energy, Inc. V. Andrew G. Skalkos, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 83-26
Appeal No. 0073: Commerce Operating, Inc. V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0073: Commerce Operating, Inc. V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
No abstract provided.
Appeal No. 0069: Integrated Petroleum Co.. Inc. V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0069: Integrated Petroleum Co.. Inc. V. Renee J. Houser, Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 83-42
Appeal No. 0063: Victor Petroleum Corporation V. Andrew G. Skalkos, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0063: Victor Petroleum Corporation V. Andrew G. Skalkos, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 83-14
Appeal No. 0056: Gasearch, Inc., Et Al. V. Andrew G. Skalkos, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0056: Gasearch, Inc., Et Al. V. Andrew G. Skalkos, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Issuance of Permit 3180
Appeal No. 0060: Akron Petroleum, Inc. V. Andrew G. Skalkos, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0060: Akron Petroleum, Inc. V. Andrew G. Skalkos, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
No abstract provided.
Appeal No. 0058: Horn Resources Corp. V. Andrew G. Skalkos, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas Of The Department Of Natural Resources, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0058: Horn Resources Corp. V. Andrew G. Skalkos, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas Of The Department Of Natural Resources, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
No abstract provided.
Appeal No. 0057: The Oxford Oil Company V. Andrew G. Skalkos, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0057: The Oxford Oil Company V. Andrew G. Skalkos, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
No abstract provided.
Appeal No. 0054: James Drilling Corporation V. Andrew G. Skalkos, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas Of The Department Of Natural Resources, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0054: James Drilling Corporation V. Andrew G. Skalkos, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas Of The Department Of Natural Resources, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Adjudication Order 374
Appeal No. 0053: Russell Township Board Of Trustees Of Geauga County V. Andrew G. Skalkos, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas Of The Department Of Natural Resources, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0053: Russell Township Board Of Trustees Of Geauga County V. Andrew G. Skalkos, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas Of The Department Of Natural Resources, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Adjudication Order 357
Appeal No. 0052: In The Matter Of The Appeal Of Petroleum Securities, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0052: In The Matter Of The Appeal Of Petroleum Securities, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Adjudication Order No. 350
The Ohio Bill Of Rights, Paul C. Giannelli
Evaluating Article 2 Of The Uniform Commercial Code: A Preliminary Empirical Expedition, James J. White
Evaluating Article 2 Of The Uniform Commercial Code: A Preliminary Empirical Expedition, James J. White
Articles
A proponent of commercial law codification, Mr. Eaton was one of the first American lawyers to perceive that mere codification of the law did not necessarily produce certainty and lack of discord in the law of commercial transactions. Indeed, in the same article Eaton reveals that of the 1,091 cases that had arisen under the Negotiable Instruments Law, only 704 cited the Act and in the other 387 "the Negotiable Instruments Law [was] ignored by the courts in the decisions, and (so far as the reports show) by the counsel in these cases...." Unlike Bentham, Carter, and Field, each of …
How Citizens Can Use The Initiative Power, Robert L. Scott
How Citizens Can Use The Initiative Power, Robert L. Scott
IUSTITIA
The purpose of this discussion is to demonstrate how the initiative power may be employed by citizens wishing to pass a law independent of the state legislature. Although the initiative power is granted in many state constitutions, in the past it has been used sparingly. However during these days of political activism the initiative power has been given new vitality. For example, in the area of environmental law it has been employed by citizens groups in such states as California, Illinois, and Wisconsin to reserve greater individual rights against environmental polluters.
Disorderly Conduct Statutes And Ohio, Charles M. Young
Disorderly Conduct Statutes And Ohio, Charles M. Young
Cleveland State Law Review
In Ohio, as throughout the country, the peace and good order of communities are often protected by vague disorderly conduct statutes which fail to sufficiently define prohibited conduct. The failure of such statutes to provide specific standards for enforcement, and the determination of the courts to uphold these laws, may lead to an arbitrary standard of justice. Whens the courts are presented with a vagueness question concerning an archaic city or state statute, they should be eager to void, rather than careful to limit and interpret the language of the law. It is the duty of the legislatures to provide …
A Survey Of The Ohio Administrative Procedures Act, Glenn R. Jones
A Survey Of The Ohio Administrative Procedures Act, Glenn R. Jones
Cleveland State Law Review
The recent expansion of the use of administrative agencies to facilitate the functioning of the various levels of governmental operations has created a correspondingly complex morass of procedural law. Administrative procedure being the creation of administrative law, a definition of the latter is necessary for an understanding of the former. This area of law has been demarcated by "the provisions of statutes conferring rule making and adjudicatory powers upon organizations in government outside the judicial branch and orders entered by these agencies pursuant to such powers."' It should be noted, however, that this definition, like other brief definitions of broad …
Judicial Review For Ohio's Civil Servants, Donald Applestein
Judicial Review For Ohio's Civil Servants, Donald Applestein
Cleveland State Law Review
With the proliferation of administrative agencies, numerous problems are naturally encountered. In spite of the tendency toward problems, one would hope that in establishing these agencies, the legislature whether it be on the local, state, or federal level would do its utmost to insure uniformity within a given area. A review of sections 119.12, 143.27, and 2506 of the Ohio Revised Code and the relevant case law, however, reveals the Ohio legislature's failure to insure that uniformity.
Using Statistical Evidence To Enforce The Laws Against Discrimination, Kenneth Montlack
Using Statistical Evidence To Enforce The Laws Against Discrimination, Kenneth Montlack
Cleveland State Law Review
In actions brought under a variety of federal statutes barring racial discrimination, the federal judiciary has increasingly relied upon statistical evidence in determining the existence of unlawful discrimination. This article will seek to identify the nature and extent of such reliance on statistical evidence, discuss the reasons for the increasing use of statistical evidence, analyze the significance of the increase, and explore the potential for using statistical evidence in actions by the Ohio Civil Rights Commission.
Sovereign Immunity Abrogated In Ohio: Krause V. State, James B. Wilkens
Sovereign Immunity Abrogated In Ohio: Krause V. State, James B. Wilkens
Cleveland State Law Review
The decision thus promulgates three principal rulings: (1) that sovereign immunity does not provide a bar to bringing an action against the State of Ohio, (2) that the state is liable by virtue of the doctrine of respondeat superior for the authorized activities of its officers, employees and other agents, and (3) that freedom of individual agents from civil liability arising out of authorized activities for the state is retained. The effects of these rulings are far from obvious, in large part because of the confused prior state of the law upon which they are engrafted. Furthermore, the grounds given …
Inheritance Taxation - Selected Provisions Of Michigan, Illinois And Ohio - A Study In Application And Justification, Edward B. Stulberg S.Ed.
Inheritance Taxation - Selected Provisions Of Michigan, Illinois And Ohio - A Study In Application And Justification, Edward B. Stulberg S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
This comment will explore the existing variations in four commonly encountered areas: joint interests with rights of survivorship, contingent remainder interests, powers of appointment, and life insurance proceeds. Emphasis will also be placed on treatment accorded the surviving spouse and children and the implicit relationship between such treatment and some of the above areas. The essence of this examination will be to inquire whether adoption of an estate tax would be a more suitable vehicle for implementing a local death tax program.
Civil Procedure-Habeas Corpus-Exhaustion Of State Remedies In Rendition Cases, Alfred W. Blumrosen
Civil Procedure-Habeas Corpus-Exhaustion Of State Remedies In Rendition Cases, Alfred W. Blumrosen
Michigan Law Review
Respondent, a convict, was apprehended in Ohio after escaping from an Alabama prison. He attempted to prevent rendition by petitioning the Ohio courts for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging that he had suffered cruel and unusual punishment in the Alabama prison contrary to the Fourteenth Amendment and, if forced to return, would be subject to further brutal treatment. His petition was denied at all levels in the Ohio courts and the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari. A similar petition was then denied by the Federal District Court in Ohio, but the court of appeals reversed without opinion and …
Labor Law-Class Action By Labor Union Members To Enforce Collective Bargaining Agreement-Jurisdiction Of State Courts, John Houck S.Ed.
Labor Law-Class Action By Labor Union Members To Enforce Collective Bargaining Agreement-Jurisdiction Of State Courts, John Houck S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff was an employee of defendant corporation, and an officer of the union accredited as bargaining agent. He brought an equity suit in the Ohio courts for specific enforcement of a collective bargaining agreement and to collect back wages, on behalf of himself and other union members similarly situated. The basis of the suit was section 11257 of the Ohio General Code, providing for class actions. The lower court dismissed the petition on the grounds of no jurisdiction under that section. On appeal, held, reversed. Although the defendant corporation's activities in interstate commerce subject it to federal labor legislation, …
Constitutional Law-Civil Procedure-Due Process Requirements For State Jurisdiction Over Foreign Corporations, Richard D. Rohr
Constitutional Law-Civil Procedure-Due Process Requirements For State Jurisdiction Over Foreign Corporations, Richard D. Rohr
Michigan Law Review
The plaintiff, a nonresident of Ohio, brought an action in Ohio against the defendant, a sociedad anonima organized under the laws of the Philippine Islands, on claims which neither arose in Ohio nor were connected with the defendant's activities in Ohio. Defendant's president, who was also its general manager and principal stockholder, had returned to his home in Ohio when the company's mining operations were suspended by the Japanese occupation of the Philippines. During the war years, he conducted such business as was possible in Ohio, holding directors' meetings, carrying on correspondence, maintaining bank accounts, but the defendant did not …
Federal Courts-Civil Procedure-Availability To Plaintiff Of Change Of Venue Under Title 28 U.S.C.A. 1404(A), Richard B. Gushée S.Ed.
Federal Courts-Civil Procedure-Availability To Plaintiff Of Change Of Venue Under Title 28 U.S.C.A. 1404(A), Richard B. Gushée S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
The plaintiffs filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio in order to obtain service on the defendant. The plaintiff then filed a motion for an order to transfer the cause to the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania under Title 28 U.S.C.A. 1404(a) on the grounds that all the plaintiffs and witnesses resided in Pennsylvania, that it would be inconvenient and expensive to transport these witnesses to Ohio, and that the cause of action arose in Pennsylvania. Held, motion denied. Title 28 U.S.C.A. 1404(a) is not available …
Municipal Corporations-Collective Bargaining Contracts-Implied Power To Bargain With A Labor Union, Joseph R. Brookshire S.Ed.
Municipal Corporations-Collective Bargaining Contracts-Implied Power To Bargain With A Labor Union, Joseph R. Brookshire S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Under the Ohio Constitution the City of Cleveland had the power to own and operate a street railway system. The city charter authorized the Transit Board to supervise, manage and control the transit system. The authorization included the power to establish wages and working conditions in accordance with the provisions of the charter. An action for a declaratory judgment was brought in order to determine whether the board had the power to contract with a union as the exclusive bargaining agent of the transit system employees, or the power to contract with a union for arbitration of disputes, and finally, …