Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Corporate governance (21)
- Journal of Corporation Law (13)
- Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (12)
- Business Lawyer (10)
- SSRN (10)
-
- Corporate law (9)
- Insider trading (9)
- Law (8)
- Stanford Law Review (8)
- Virginia Law Review (8)
- Class action (7)
- Columbia Business Law Review (7)
- Rule 10b-5 (7)
- Columbia Law Review (6)
- University of Pennsylvania Law Review (6)
- Fiduciary duties (5)
- Hedge fund activism (5)
- Mandatory disclosure (5)
- Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) (5)
- Securities Exchange Act (5)
- Securities market (5)
- Securities regulation (5)
- Agency costs (4)
- Corporate management (4)
- Disclosure (4)
- Financial regulation (4)
- Fraud (4)
- Fraud on the market (4)
- Harvard Business Law Review (4)
- Hedge fund (4)
Articles 151 - 152 of 152
Full-Text Articles in Law
A Structural Approach To Corporations: The Case Against Defensive Tactics In Tender Offers, Ronald J. Gilson
A Structural Approach To Corporations: The Case Against Defensive Tactics In Tender Offers, Ronald J. Gilson
Faculty Scholarship
Tender offers present an obvious and inherent conflict of interest between management and shareholders. On the one hand, an offer provides shareholders with the opportunity to sell their shares for a substantial premium over market price. On the other hand, the tender offer is the principal mechanism by which management can be forcibly unseated from control. It should thus come as no surprise that management often resists outsiders' efforts to direct tender offers at its shareholders. The form of that resistance, however, is somewhat surprising. Because the tender offer is the only form of corporate acquisition addressed directly to the …
The Survival Of The Derivative Suit: An Evaluation And A Proposal For Legislative Reform, John C. Coffee Jr., Donald E. Schwartz
The Survival Of The Derivative Suit: An Evaluation And A Proposal For Legislative Reform, John C. Coffee Jr., Donald E. Schwartz
Faculty Scholarship
The shareholder derivative suit today faces extinction. Long considered the "chief regulator of corporate management," and a recognized form of litigation in American courts at least since 1855, it now confronts the second great challenge of its history. Thirty-odd years ago, commentators foresaw the derivative suit's demise when state legislatures began adopting security-for-expenses statutes to curb the abuses of "strike suit" litigation. These reports of its death proved exaggerated, however, as plaintiffs discovered various tactics by which to outflank these statutes. As a result, by the late 1960's, the crisis was past, and a revival in the action's popularity was …