Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Firearms--Law and legislation (37)
- Gun control (26)
- Constitutional law (23)
- Constitution. 2nd Amendment (14)
- Second Amendment (14)
-
- District of Columbia v. Heller (13)
- Firearms (9)
- Firearms ownership (8)
- Self-defense (8)
- Civil rights (6)
- Constitutional history (5)
- Gun violence (5)
- Guns (5)
- Second amendment (5)
- Public health (4)
- Public safety (4)
- Constitution. 1st Amendment (3)
- Gun Rights (3)
- Judicial process (3)
- Law--Interpretation and construction (3)
- Self-defense (Law) (3)
- United States (3)
- 2A (2)
- Constitution (2)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Due process of law (2)
- Firearms--Social aspects (2)
- Freedom of speech (2)
- Gun law (2)
- Gun policy (2)
Articles 31 - 60 of 75
Full-Text Articles in Law
A Public Health Law Path For Second Amendment Jurisprudence, Michael Ulrich
A Public Health Law Path For Second Amendment Jurisprudence, Michael Ulrich
Faculty Scholarship
The two landmark gun rights cases, District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. City of Chicago, came down in 2008 and 2010, respectively. In the decade that has followed, two things have become abundantly clear. First, these cases provide little clarity about the nature and scope of Second Amendment rights, resulting in chaos and circuit splits in the lower courts. Second, growing empirical evidence has revealed that, in the background of the debate on individual constitutional rights, a serious gun violence epidemic is intensifying around the country. In one corner, gun rights advocates worry that increased firearm regulation will …
Firearms, Extreme Risk, And Legal Design: "Red Flag" Laws And Due Process, Joseph Blocher, Jacob D. Charles
Firearms, Extreme Risk, And Legal Design: "Red Flag" Laws And Due Process, Joseph Blocher, Jacob D. Charles
Faculty Scholarship
The most prominent recent development in gun regulation has been the spread of extreme risk protection order (ERPO) laws—often called “red flag” laws—which permit the denial of firearms to individuals who a judge has determined present an imminent risk of harm to themselves or others. Following a wave of adoptions in the wake of the Parkland murders, such orders are now authorized by law in eighteen states and the District of Columbia, and under consideration in many others. Advocates argue that they provide a tailored, individualized way to deter homicide, suicide, and even mass shootings by providing a tool for …
Sane Gun Policy From Texas? A Blueprint For Balanced State Campus Carry Laws, Aric Short
Sane Gun Policy From Texas? A Blueprint For Balanced State Campus Carry Laws, Aric Short
Faculty Scholarship
merican universities are caught in the crosshairs of one of the most polarizing and contentious gun policy debates: whether to allow concealed carry on campus. Ten states have implemented "campus carry" in some form; sixteen new states considered passage last year; and a growing wave of momentum is building in favor of additional adoptions. Despite this push towards campus carry, most states adopting the policy fail to strike an effective balance between the competing rights and interests involved. When states give universities the option to opt out of the law, for example, they almost always do. Other states impose a …
Reciprocal Concealed Carry: The Constitutional Issues, William Araiza
Reciprocal Concealed Carry: The Constitutional Issues, William Araiza
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Response: Rights As Trumps Of What?, Joseph Blocher
Response: Rights As Trumps Of What?, Joseph Blocher
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Conflict And Sensitive Places, Darrell A. H. Miller
Constitutional Conflict And Sensitive Places, Darrell A. H. Miller
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Stevens, J., Dissenting: The Legacy Of Heller, Joseph Blocher, Darrell A. H. Miller
Stevens, J., Dissenting: The Legacy Of Heller, Joseph Blocher, Darrell A. H. Miller
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Revisionist History? Responding To Gun Violence Under Historical Limitations, Michael Ulrich
Revisionist History? Responding To Gun Violence Under Historical Limitations, Michael Ulrich
Faculty Scholarship
In the D.C. Circuit case Heller v. District of Columbia (Heller II), Judge Kavanaugh wrote that “Heller and McDonald leave little doubt that courts are to assess gun bans and regulations based on text, history, and tradition, not by a balancing test such as strict or intermediate scrutiny.” Now Justice Kavanaugh, will he find support on the highest court for what was then a dissenting view? Chief Justice Roberts, during oral arguments for Heller I, asked “Isn’t it enough to…look at the various regulations that were available at the time…and determine how these—how this restriction and the scope of this …
Owning Heller, Darrell A. H. Miller
Owning Heller, Darrell A. H. Miller
Faculty Scholarship
Recent historical research using big-data techniques casts doubt on whether District of Columbia v. Heller was rightly decided according to originalist methods. These new discoveries put originalists in a bind. Do they embrace “faint hearted” originalism: the idea that as between the need for stability in prior decision making, settled expectations, and the coherence of the law, some adulterated decisions must remain enforced for the greater good? Or do they follow Justice Thomas’s reasoning in Gamble v. United States, remain stout-hearted, and reject any prior decision that cannot be supported by the common linguistic usage of the founding era – …
Bans, Joseph Blocher
Bans, Joseph Blocher
Faculty Scholarship
In the universe of legal restrictions subject to judicial review, those characterized as fully denying some aspect of a constitutional right—bans—are often subject to per se rules of invalidity. Whether the subject of the restriction is a medium of expression, the valuable use of property, or a class of weapons, courts in such cases will often short-circuit the standard doctrinal machinery and strike down the law, even if it might have survived heightened scrutiny. Identifying laws as bans can thus provide an end run around the tiers of scrutiny and other familiar forms of means-ends analysis.
And yet it is …
Will It Ever End? Preventing Mass Shootings In Florida & The U.S., Vanessa Terrades, Shahabudeen Khan
Will It Ever End? Preventing Mass Shootings In Florida & The U.S., Vanessa Terrades, Shahabudeen Khan
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Second Amendment As Positive Law, Joseph Blocher, Darrell A.H. Miller
The Second Amendment As Positive Law, Joseph Blocher, Darrell A.H. Miller
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Arming The Second Amendment - And Enforcing The Fourteenth, William Araiza
Arming The Second Amendment - And Enforcing The Fourteenth, William Araiza
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Guns On Campus: A Look At The First Year Of Concealed Carry At Texas Universities, Aric K. Short
Guns On Campus: A Look At The First Year Of Concealed Carry At Texas Universities, Aric K. Short
Faculty Scholarship
After years of failed attempts, the Texas Legislature passed "campus carry" in 2015. Under the new law, effective in 2016 for four-year institutions, public universities must allow the concealed carry of handguns by license holders on their premises. Texas's campus carry law is unique when compared to other states that allow concealed carry on college campuses: each university is given the flexibility to create weapons implementation plans, including the establishment of limited gun-free zones. The first year of campus carry implementation by Texas universities has been relatively quiet, with generally uniform implementation rules established by colleges across the state. However, …
The Second Amendment & Private Law, Cody Jacobs
The Second Amendment & Private Law, Cody Jacobs
Faculty Scholarship
The Second Amendment, like other federal constitutional rights, is a restriction on government power. But what role does the Second Amendment have to play—if any—when a private party seeks to limit the exercise of Second Amendment rights by invoking private law causes of action? Private law—specifically, the law of torts, contracts, and property—has often been impacted by constitutional considerations, though in seemingly inconsistent ways. The First Amendment places limitations on defamation actions and other related torts, and also prevents courts from entering injunctions that could be classified as prior restraints. On the other hand, the First Amendment plays almost no …
Fear And Firearms, Darrell A. H. Miller
Second Amendment Traditionalism And Desuetude, Darrell A. H. Miller
Second Amendment Traditionalism And Desuetude, Darrell A. H. Miller
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Lethality, Public Carry, And Adequate Alternatives, Joseph Blocher, Darrell A. H. Miller
Lethality, Public Carry, And Adequate Alternatives, Joseph Blocher, Darrell A. H. Miller
Faculty Scholarship
This Article explores the relationship between lethality and the right to bear arms, and considers how that relationship might be shaped by the availability of non-lethal alternative weapons. Prior scholarship has asked whether the Second Amendment includes a right to carry non-lethal “Arms.” An important set of related questions remains: does the Second Amendment necessarily include a right to arm oneself publicly with lethal force, if non-lethal alternatives are available? And how should one evaluate the adequacy of those alternatives?
What Is Gun Control? Direct Burdens Incidental Burdens, And The Boundaries Of The Second Amendment, Joseph Blocher, Darrell A. H. Miller
What Is Gun Control? Direct Burdens Incidental Burdens, And The Boundaries Of The Second Amendment, Joseph Blocher, Darrell A. H. Miller
Faculty Scholarship
Particularly in places with few recognizable gun control laws, “gun neutral” civil and criminal rules are an important but often-unnoticed basis for the legal regulation of guns. The burdens that these rules impose on the keeping and bearing of arms are at times significant, but they are also incidental, which raises hard questions about the boundaries between constitutional law, regulation, and legally enforceable private ordering. Does the Second Amendment apply to civil suits for trespass, negligence, and nuisance? Does the Amendment cover gun-neutral laws of general applicability like assault and disturbing the peace? In the course of addressing these practical …
Firearm Legislation And Firearm Mortality In The Usa: A Cross-Sectional, State-Level Study, Bindu Kalesan, Matthew Mobily, Olivia Keiser, Jeffrey Fagan
Firearm Legislation And Firearm Mortality In The Usa: A Cross-Sectional, State-Level Study, Bindu Kalesan, Matthew Mobily, Olivia Keiser, Jeffrey Fagan
Faculty Scholarship
In an effort to reduce firearm mortality rates in the USA, US states have enacted a range of firearm laws to either strengthen or deregulate the existing main federal gun control law, the Brady Law. We set out to determine the independent association of different firearm laws with overall firearm mortality, homicide firearm mortality, and suicide firearm mortality across all US states. We also projected the potential reduction of firearm mortality if the three most strongly associated firearm laws were enacted at the federal level.
End The Popularity Contest: A Proposal For Second Amendment 'Type Of Weapon' Analysis, Cody Jacobs
End The Popularity Contest: A Proposal For Second Amendment 'Type Of Weapon' Analysis, Cody Jacobs
Faculty Scholarship
The Supreme Court’s recognition of an individual Second Amendment right to bear arms for self-defense raised many questions about the scope and content of that right. One issue that will become increasingly important in the years ahead, but that has received relatively little attention from scholars and courts, is the question of which “arms” are protected by that right. The Supreme Court’s decision in District of Columbia v. Heller purports to lay out a test that asks whether the weapon at issue is in “common use” at the time the case is decided. This article critiques that test, arguing that …
Hunting And The Second Amendment, Joseph Blocher
Hunting And The Second Amendment, Joseph Blocher
Faculty Scholarship
Debates about the meaning and scope of the Second Amendment have traditionally focused on whether it protects the keeping and bearing of arms for self-defense, prevention of tyranny, maintenance of the militia, or some combination of those three things. But roughly half of American gun-owners identify hunting or sport shooting as their primary reason for owning a gun. And while much public rhetoric suggests that these activities fall within the scope of the Second Amendment, some of the most committed gun-rights advocates insist that the Amendment “ain’t about hunting” and that, no matter their heritage and value, such activities are …
New Approaches To Old Questions In Gun Scholarship, Joseph Blocher
New Approaches To Old Questions In Gun Scholarship, Joseph Blocher
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Ordered Gun Liberty: Rights With Responsibilities And Regulation, Linda C. Mcclain, James E. Fleming
Ordered Gun Liberty: Rights With Responsibilities And Regulation, Linda C. Mcclain, James E. Fleming
Faculty Scholarship
This Article focuses on the case of the Second Amendment right to bear arms and gun control to examine whether the Constitution has fostered a pathological rights culture of rights without responsibilities and regulation. We offer some preliminary thoughts about “ordered gun liberty” – the individual right to bear arms in relation to responsibilities, virtues, and regulation. This article addresses a conundrum concerning this right: there is no individual right that cries out more for governmental encouragement of responsibility concerning its exercise and for governmental regulation to promote safety and to protect from harm, and yet there is no individual …
Good Cause Requirements For Carrying Guns In Public, Joseph Blocher
Good Cause Requirements For Carrying Guns In Public, Joseph Blocher
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Peruta, The Home-Bound Second Amendment, And Fractal Originalism, Darrell A. H. Miller
Peruta, The Home-Bound Second Amendment, And Fractal Originalism, Darrell A. H. Miller
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Gun Rights Talk, Joseph Blocher
Text, History, And Tradition: What The Seventh Amendment Can Teach Us About The Second, Darrell A. H. Miller
Text, History, And Tradition: What The Seventh Amendment Can Teach Us About The Second, Darrell A. H. Miller
Faculty Scholarship
In District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. City of Chicago, the Supreme Court made seemingly irreconcilable demands on lower courts: evaluate Second Amendment claims through history, avoid balancing, and retain as much regulation as possible. To date, lower courts have been unable to devise a test that satisfies all three of these conditions. Worse, the emerging default candidate, intermediate scrutiny, is a test that many jurists and scholars consider exceedingly manipulable.
This Article argues that courts could look to the Supreme Court’s Seventh Amendment jurisprudence, and in particular the Seventh Amendment’s “historical test,” to help them devise a …
Analogies And Institutions In The First And Second Amendments: A Response To Professor Magarian, Darrell A.H. Miller
Analogies And Institutions In The First And Second Amendments: A Response To Professor Magarian, Darrell A.H. Miller
Faculty Scholarship
In this essay, Professor Darrell Miller responds to Professor Gregory Magarian's criticism of the manner in which judges, advocates, and scholars have used the First Amendment to frame Second Amendment interpretive questions.
Firearm Localism, Joseph Blocher
Firearm Localism, Joseph Blocher
Faculty Scholarship
Second Amendment doctrine is largely becoming a line-drawing exercise, as courts try to determine which “Arms” are constitutionally protected, which “people” are permitted to keep and bear them, and in which ways those arms and people can be regulated. But the developing legal regime has yet to account for one potentially significant set of lines: the city limits themselves. In rural areas, gun crime and gun control are relatively rare, and gun culture is strong. In cities, by contrast, rates of violent gun crime are comparatively high, and opportunities for recreational gun use are scarce. And from colonial Boston to …