Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Patents & Technology (10)
- Copyright (4)
- Technology (4)
- Computer (3)
- Software (3)
-
- Access (2)
- DNA (2)
- Gene transfer (2)
- Genetic testing (2)
- Genetics (2)
- Human genome (2)
- NAFTA (2)
- Reproductive cloning (2)
- Universities (2)
- Academic research (1)
- Academic-industry relationships (1)
- Amazon (1)
- Anonymity (1)
- Balkanization (1)
- Beyond Our Control?: Confronting the Limits of Our Legal System in the Age of Cyberspace (1)
- Biegel (Stuart) (1)
- Bioethical challenges (1)
- Bioethics (1)
- Bioinformatics (1)
- Biological (1)
- Biomedical science (1)
- Biotechnology (1)
- Book reviews (1)
- Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1)
- Citizenship (1)
- Publication
-
- UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law (30)
- UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law (19)
- Canadian Journal of Law and Technology (16)
- Duke Law & Technology Review (10)
- Journal of Health Care Law and Policy (9)
-
- Michigan Law Review (3)
- NYLS Law Review (3)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (2)
- UIC Law Review (2)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (1)
- Sustainable Development Law & Policy (1)
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice (1)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (1)
Articles 91 - 98 of 98
Full-Text Articles in Law
Protecting The Rights Of Indigenous Cultures Under The Current Intellectual Property System: Is It A Good Idea?, 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 88 (2003), Juan Andrés Fuentes
Protecting The Rights Of Indigenous Cultures Under The Current Intellectual Property System: Is It A Good Idea?, 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 88 (2003), Juan Andrés Fuentes
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Globalization and digital communication trends have provided new avenues and incentives for the commercial use of the folkloric artwork of indigenous peoples. Such commercial uses, however, have occurred largely without any creative control or financial benefit inuring to the original creators, people, or tribe of whom the artistic works form an integral part of their culture. Since much of the works are owned by a community as a whole, as opposed to being owned by individuals, it is difficult to fit such works into an intellectual property regime that is based on laws formed around Western notions of art and …
Is The Experimental Use Exemption For Patent Infringement Still Needed?, 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 103 (2003), Melanie K. Kitzan Haindfield
Is The Experimental Use Exemption For Patent Infringement Still Needed?, 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 103 (2003), Melanie K. Kitzan Haindfield
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
The judicially created experimental use exemption has traditionally been a limitation on a patent holder’s rights because it allows patent infringing activities involving research for mere curiosity or amusement. This exemption was later modified to further protect any research performed by institutions not having a profit motive for the patent infringement, resulting in many institutions freely infringing patented inventions, knowing that broad protection was available under the experimental use exemption. However, in 2002 the Federal Circuit effectively ended the experimental use exemption as a defense for academic institutions, by recognizing that academic institutions can be held liable for infringement for …
“You Said What?”: A Look At The Influence Of Foreign Patent Prosecution On Domestic Infringement Litigation, 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 119 (2003), Brian R. Cheslek
“You Said What?”: A Look At The Influence Of Foreign Patent Prosecution On Domestic Infringement Litigation, 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 119 (2003), Brian R. Cheslek
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
The current patent statutes are structured to grant unambiguous patents that give patent holders a right to exclude and provide the public with ample notice of the patented subject matter. Therefore, courts should interpret the scope of a claim using only the specification and the file history, the very tools used by the patent holder and public to define the bounds of the patent. Unfortunately, limiting statements made abroad can be allowed into evidence, creating a way or accused infringers to evade liability. By permitting judges to admit extrinsic evidence for the purpose of providing clarity to a supposedly already …
The Rambus Shell Game: A Lack Of Integrity In The Standards Setting Process, 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 138 (2003), David Adam Dorth
The Rambus Shell Game: A Lack Of Integrity In The Standards Setting Process, 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 138 (2003), David Adam Dorth
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Standards setting organizations are formed to promulgate industry standards and in turn manage the course of technology that falls within their particular niche. Industry standards are the cornerstone of the technological compatibility that we enjoy as an advanced society. As we delve into the 21st century and beyond, the role of integrity in the standards setting process as a whole must be recognized by standards groups, end-users and importantly by the courts. This comment seeks to draw these entities into focusing on integrity and understand its importance in standards setting. Finally, this article strives to present a good starting point …
Making A Pitch For Extending A Judge's Power To Determine Obviousness: How The Mcginley Court Struck Out, 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 156 (2003), John Petravich
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Obviousness is one of the most litigated elements of patent of validity, due primarily to the enormous gray area between the roles of judge and jury. While obviousness is ultimately a legal question, the courts make an effort to leave the underlying factual determinations to the jury, with mixed results. McGinley v. Franklin Sports, Inc. illustrates the problems with the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s current approach as to what role juries and district court judges should play in determining obviousness of a patent. Instead of the McGinley approach of maintaining a significant role for juries in resolving …
Yahoo! Cyber-Collision Of Cultures: Who Regulates?, Horatia Muir Watt
Yahoo! Cyber-Collision Of Cultures: Who Regulates?, Horatia Muir Watt
Michigan Journal of International Law
This Article furthers this comparison of cyberconflicts and the real world, attempting to ascertain what lessons, if any, can be drawn from it. Part I of the Article explores the interests at stake in cyberconflicts and the relationship between technology and the law. Part II uses the French Yahoo! court's decision to show that real-world conceptions of prescriptive jurisdiction retain their legitimacy in cyberspace. Finally, Part III notes that the prospect of near perfect compliance offered by Internet technology provides the opportunity to engineer mature, well-calibrated solutions to international regulatory conflicts, which might then even serve as a model in …
Can Our Current Conception Of Copyright Law Survive The Internet Age?, Edward Samuels
Can Our Current Conception Of Copyright Law Survive The Internet Age?, Edward Samuels
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Financial Conflicts Of Interest In Human Subjects Research: Proposals For A More Effective Regulatory Scheme, Karen A. Jordan
Financial Conflicts Of Interest In Human Subjects Research: Proposals For A More Effective Regulatory Scheme, Karen A. Jordan
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.