Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Colorado Law School (24)
- Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (6)
- University of Massachusetts Boston (5)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (5)
- Selected Works (4)
-
- The University of Maine (4)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (3)
- Duke Law (2)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (1)
- Himmelfarb Health Sciences Library, The George Washington University (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Montclair State University (1)
- Old Dominion University (1)
- SelectedWorks (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Massachusetts Amherst (1)
- University of New Hampshire (1)
- William & Mary (1)
- William & Mary Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- United States (14)
- Colorado (8)
- New West (4)
- Congress (3)
- Education (3)
-
- Great Outdoors Colorado (3)
- Land Use (3)
- Legislation (3)
- Lobbying (3)
- Maine (3)
- Maine women's serial pubs (3)
- Partnerships (3)
- Population growth (3)
- Public Land Law (3)
- Public Lands (3)
- Terrorism (3)
- Women (3)
- Women's organizations (3)
- ATVs (2)
- Alternatives (2)
- American Recreation Coalition (2)
- BLM (2)
- Balance costs and benefits (2)
- Big Bend National Park (2)
- Biological Warfare (2)
- Bureau of Land Management (2)
- Case studies (2)
- Case study (2)
- Cost effectiveness (2)
- Discrimination (2)
- Publication
-
- Outdoor Recreation: Promise and Peril in the New West (Summer Conference, June 8-10) (21)
- International Bulletin of Political Psychology (6)
- All Faculty Scholarship (5)
- Research to Practice Series, Institute for Community Inclusion (4)
- Buffalo Environmental Law Journal (3)
-
- Maine Women's Publications - All (3)
- Resource Law Notes: The Newsletter of the Natural Resources Law Center (1984-2002) (3)
- Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Anne Bloom (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (1)
- Center for Economic Development Technical Reports (1)
- Center for Health Policy Research (1)
- Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects (1)
- Donald J. Kochan (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- LLM Theses and Essays (1)
- Maine Town Documents (1)
- Michael D. Cooper, Esq. (1)
- National Institute of Justice Office of Justice Programs (1)
- Paul F. Eschenfelder (1)
- Paulo Ferreira da Cunha (1)
- Publications from President Jonathan G.S. Koppell (1)
- RISK: Health, Safety & Environment (1990-2002) (1)
- Theses and Dissertations in Urban Services - Urban Management (1)
- Tools for Inclusion Series, Institute for Community Inclusion (1)
- William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 61 - 66 of 66
Full-Text Articles in Law
"Not Just For The Fun Of It!" Governmental Restraints On Black Leisure, Social Inequality, And The Privatization Of Public Space, Regina Austin
"Not Just For The Fun Of It!" Governmental Restraints On Black Leisure, Social Inequality, And The Privatization Of Public Space, Regina Austin
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Rights And Efficiency In American Health Law, Maxwell Gregg Bloche
Rights And Efficiency In American Health Law, Maxwell Gregg Bloche
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
During the 1960s and 1970s, the individual rights revolution that swept through American society remade much of the nation's health law in its image. Sick people acquired the right to be told of the risks and benefits of proposed treatments and then to give thumbs-up or thumbs-down to their doctors' decisions. Successful suits for medical negligence went from rare to commonplace. Elderly and poor Americans achieved statutory rights of access to publicly funded healthcare, and courts burnished these rights with myriad procedural protections. The critically ill and their families won the right to refuse aggressive, life-sustaining treatments. Psychiatric patients acquired …
Can Internet Offerings Bridge The Small Business Capital Barrier?, Jill E. Fisch
Can Internet Offerings Bridge The Small Business Capital Barrier?, Jill E. Fisch
All Faculty Scholarship
Internet technology offers the potential to reduce the search and information costs associated with capital formation. Commentators have suggested that the Web will enable small business to achieve better access to the capital markets. To facilitate this access, they have suggested regulatory reforms to make internet offerings cheaper and easier. At the same time, small business offerings have been identified as among the most risky, offering a caution to those who counsel regulatory reform. This article examines the existing regulatory climate. State and federal regulators have adopted a number of recent reforms to facilitate the use of the internet and …
Who May Give Birth To Citizens? Reproduction, Eugenics, And Immigration, Dorothy E. Roberts
Who May Give Birth To Citizens? Reproduction, Eugenics, And Immigration, Dorothy E. Roberts
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Dalla Simbologia Giuridica A Una Filosofia Giuridica E Politica Simbolica ? Ovvero Il Diritto E I Sensi, Paulo Ferreira Da Cunha
Dalla Simbologia Giuridica A Una Filosofia Giuridica E Politica Simbolica ? Ovvero Il Diritto E I Sensi, Paulo Ferreira Da Cunha
Paulo Ferreira da Cunha
La prima conseguenza della nostra cultura giuridica dell'audizione che è anche cultura dell'oralità, del discorso e della scrittura (di tutto ciò che serve per parlare e fissare quello che può essere detto) è la volontaria atrofia degli altri sensi: il tatto, il gusto, l'olfatto e la vista. Il Diritto quasi non tocca le cose. Le concepisce mentalmente, le dice, però, anche se con i guanti deve toccare il corpo del delitto.
"Public Use" And The Independent Judiciary: Condemnation In An Interest-Group Perspective, Donald J. Kochan
"Public Use" And The Independent Judiciary: Condemnation In An Interest-Group Perspective, Donald J. Kochan
Donald J. Kochan
This Article reexamines the doctrine of public use under the Takings Clause and its ability to impede takings for private use through an application of public choice theory. It argues that the judicial validation of interest-group capture of the condemnation power through a relaxed public use standard in Takings Clause review can be explained by interest group politics and public choice theory and by institutional tendencies inherent in the independent judiciary. Legislators can sell the eminent domain power to special interests for almost any use, promising durability in the deal given the low probability that the judiciary will invalidate it …