Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Vanderbilt University Law School (17)
- Seattle University School of Law (12)
- Cleveland State University (8)
- West Virginia University (4)
- Fordham Law School (3)
-
- Texas A&M University School of Law (3)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (3)
- University of Michigan Law School (3)
- Marquette University Law School (2)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (2)
- Pepperdine University (2)
- St. Mary's University (2)
- University of Maine School of Law (2)
- Emory University School of Law (1)
- Georgia State University College of Law (1)
- Lewis & Clark Law School (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Southern Methodist University (1)
- St. Thomas University College of Law (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (1)
- University of Colorado Law School (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (1)
- University of San Diego (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (12)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (12)
- Cleveland State Law Review (8)
- West Virginia Law Review (4)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (3)
-
- Texas A&M Journal of Property Law (3)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (3)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (3)
- Maine Law Review (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- Northwestern University Law Review (2)
- Pepperdine Law Review (2)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (2)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (2)
- Animal Law Review (1)
- Arkansas Law Review (1)
- Emory International Law Review (1)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (1)
- Georgia State University Law Review (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review (1)
- Marquette Law Review (1)
- Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law (1)
- Mitchell Hamline Law Review (1)
- NYLS Law Review (1)
- Oklahoma Law Review (1)
- Pace Environmental Law Review (1)
- SMU Law Review (1)
- San Diego Law Review (1)
- St. Thomas Law Review (1)
Articles 61 - 78 of 78
Full-Text Articles in Law
Coal Slurry Pipelines--In The Public Interest, C. Howard Hardesty, Edward S. Shipper Jr.
Coal Slurry Pipelines--In The Public Interest, C. Howard Hardesty, Edward S. Shipper Jr.
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Book Received, Law Library Staff
Book Received, Law Library Staff
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
Books Received
Aspects of the International Banking Safety Net
By G.G. Johnson, with Richard K. Abrams
Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund, 1983. Pp. v, 36. $5.00
============
The Soviet Viewpoint
By Georgi Arbatov and Willem Oltmans
New York: Dodd, Mead, 1983. Pp. xviii, 219. $13.95
============
The Law of Corporate Groups: Procedural Problems in the Law of Parent and Subsidiary Corporations
By Phillip I. Blumberg
Boston and Toronto: Little, Brown and Company, 1983. Pp. xxxii, 527. $65.00
=============
Iraq & Iran: Roots of Conflict
By Tareq Y. Ismael
Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1982. Pp. xii, 226. $24.00 cloth; $12.95 paper …
Property—Zoning—The Courts Further Define Their Limited Role, Audrey Riemer Evans
Property—Zoning—The Courts Further Define Their Limited Role, Audrey Riemer Evans
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Nyrpl § 226-B: No Right To Sublease Without Consent, Carolyn Debra Karp
Nyrpl § 226-B: No Right To Sublease Without Consent, Carolyn Debra Karp
Fordham Urban Law Journal
This article examines section 226-b of the New York Real Property law, enacted by the New York State Legislature in 1975. Enacted to give tenants in a dwelling having four or more residential units the right to sublease or assign their apartments, subject to the landlord's consent, it provides that the landlord must release the tenant from the lease if (s)he "unreasonably withholds consent for such sublease or assignment." The section thus gives tenants the right to remain in occupancy or to elect to be released from their leasehold obligations. However, some courts have interpreted this section to confer upon …
Nyrpl § 226-B: No Right To Sublease Without Consent, Carolyn Debra Karp
Nyrpl § 226-B: No Right To Sublease Without Consent, Carolyn Debra Karp
Fordham Urban Law Journal
This article examines section 226-b of the New York Real Property law, enacted by the New York State Legislature in 1975. Enacted to give tenants in a dwelling having four or more residential units the right to sublease or assign their apartments, subject to the landlord's consent, it provides that the landlord must release the tenant from the lease if (s)he "unreasonably withholds consent for such sublease or assignment." The section thus gives tenants the right to remain in occupancy or to elect to be released from their leasehold obligations. However, some courts have interpreted this section to confer upon …
Loosening The Grip Of The Dead Hand: Shall We Abolish Legal Future Interests In Land?, C. Dent Bostick
Loosening The Grip Of The Dead Hand: Shall We Abolish Legal Future Interests In Land?, C. Dent Bostick
Vanderbilt Law Review
This Article is concerned with a dilemma in the law of Future Interests. The dilemma stems from the needs and demands of a modern society to convey land cleanly and quickly and from the desire of property owners, especially landowners, to direct from the grave the on-going disposition of their property. This desire of landowners has always played a role in English and American property law. Much of the energy of the early judiciary was devoted to counter balancing the numerous ingenious arrangements devised by persons to effectuate continual control of their property.
Foreign Sovereign Immunity--The Status Of Legal Entities In Socialist Countries As Defendants Under The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act Of 1976, Jere G. Thompson
Foreign Sovereign Immunity--The Status Of Legal Entities In Socialist Countries As Defendants Under The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act Of 1976, Jere G. Thompson
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 (FSIA) grants an "agency or instrumentality" of a foreign state substantially the same immunities that are provided to the state itself under the Act. An agency or instrumentality of a foreign state is defined in section 1603(b) of the FSIA. Section 1603(b) lists the following three criteria that must be met by an entity in order to qualify as an agency or instrumentality for sovereign immunity purposes: (1) the entity must be a legally independent person under the laws of the foreign state in which it was created; (2) the entity must be …
The Implied Warranty Of Habitability In Landlord-Tenant Relationships: The Necessity Of Application In Texas., Stephen Bond Paxson
The Implied Warranty Of Habitability In Landlord-Tenant Relationships: The Necessity Of Application In Texas., Stephen Bond Paxson
St. Mary's Law Journal
Jurisdictions have reassessed the validity of the common law rule of caveat emptor as it relates to landlord-tenant transactions. Courts have imposed the implied warranty of habitability in the wake of the common law rule’s inapplicability to modern leasing situations. The implied warranty better reflects that the modern tenant seeks the use of a habitable dwelling for a temporary period of time. The inability to provide needed changes to the rule through limited exceptions and modifications provides the backdrop for Texas’ rejection of the common law doctrine of caveat emptor. Moreover, the courts have concerns over the harshness of the …
Trafficante V. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. - White Ghetto Tenants - Standing To Protest Landlord's Rental Discrimination, Rosalee Chiara
Trafficante V. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. - White Ghetto Tenants - Standing To Protest Landlord's Rental Discrimination, Rosalee Chiara
Cleveland State Law Review
The Supreme Court in Trafficante v. Metropolitan life Insurance Co. has held that tenants having standing under Tile VIII of the 1968 Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §3610(a), §3610(d) and 42 U.S.C. §19824 to sue their landlord for its alleged discriminatory rental practices.5 Plaintiffs, one black and one white, were tenants of an apartment complex in San Francisco whose tenant population of approximately 8,200 people was less than one percent black. The complaint alleged a variety of discriminatory rental practices directed toward non-white rental applicants and stated that plaintiffs had been injured in three respects. They claimed that they had …
Visitors' Refusal To Leave Premises, Joseph Gibson
Visitors' Refusal To Leave Premises, Joseph Gibson
Cleveland State Law Review
Many factors have been blamed for this new, brazen attitude of remaining on another's property. Some fault the Supreme Court's rulings in Brown v. Louisiana, where court conviction of sit-in demonstrators at a public library, was reversed by holding that the conviction was a violation of the fourteenth amendment rights, and Cox v. Louisiana' where the Court decided that a state statute which regulated picketing was improper because of the discretion which it gave to local officials. Others lay the blame on a more permissive society which is breeding contempt for the power structure. The most logical explanation is a …
Damages For Loss Of Trees, Evelyn Stebbins, Charles G. Sabo
Damages For Loss Of Trees, Evelyn Stebbins, Charles G. Sabo
Cleveland State Law Review
The purpose of damages is to compensate an individual for an injury or wrong, where the loss or diminution is proximately caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of another. The purpose of a measure of damages is to ascertain what compensation to award the injured person. The courts have held that the general measure for damage to real property is the difference between the market value of the property before the injury and its value after the injury. Although there is no fixed, arbitrable, or absolute rule regarding damages for the loss of trees to realty, the …
Implied Warranty Of Habitability In Leases, Ira O. Kane
Implied Warranty Of Habitability In Leases, Ira O. Kane
Cleveland State Law Review
This paper will discuss (and take issue with) the position of a significant number of American courts which have held that there is no warranty of habitability implied in a lease. It will demonstrate the failure of many courts in this country to improve the common law rule, which has proven unrealistic in light of current legislative housing standards and building codes.
Duty To Light Exterior Of Premises, Ralph J. Rosenthal
Duty To Light Exterior Of Premises, Ralph J. Rosenthal
Cleveland State Law Review
This paper will discuss the impact of lighting upon crime and crime prevention; and propose that there be recognized a general common law duty upon landowners to exercise reasonable care to maintain the means of ingress and egress to their property, over which they retain control, adequately lighted; and be liable for personal injuries due to inadequate lighting. For the purposes of this paper, distinctions among the various classes of entrants upon land, i.e., trespassers, licensees, invitees, etc., will not be considered as material. In part it is beyond the scope of this paper, and in part it is due …
Basye: Clearing Land Titles, Allan F. Smith
Basye: Clearing Land Titles, Allan F. Smith
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Clearing Land Titles. By Paul E. Basye.
Alienability Of Future Interests In Tennessee, Ernest C. Matthews, Iii
Alienability Of Future Interests In Tennessee, Ernest C. Matthews, Iii
Vanderbilt Law Review
One of the most technical problems in the field of property law is the manner in which future interests in realty and personalty may be alienated. The term, future interest, is used here to mean a presently existing interest which is deprived of possession but which looks forward to possession in the future. The term is a misnomer. Such an interest is "future" only in the sense that it looks toward becoming possessory in the future. Just as future interests is a law of words, so the alienability of future interests is, in the absence of statute, a law of …
The Constitutionality Of The New Federal Estate Tax Definition Of A Transfer Taking Effect At Death, Charles L.B. Lowndes
The Constitutionality Of The New Federal Estate Tax Definition Of A Transfer Taking Effect At Death, Charles L.B. Lowndes
Vanderbilt Law Review
The manifest reluctance in recent years on the part of the Supreme Court to declare any provision of the Federal Estate Tax unconstitutional may have given rise to the assumption that there are no constitutional limitations on the transfers which Congress can tax under the estate tax. One of the 1949 amendments to the tax should test the validity of this assumption. In an effort to bring some order out of the chaos stemming immediately from Helvering v. Hallock, and immediately from Spiegel's Estate v. Commissioner, Congress provided recently that a transfer after October 7, 1949, shall be deemed to …
Replevin Of The Contents Of Safe Deposit Boxes, Beverly Douglas Jr.
Replevin Of The Contents Of Safe Deposit Boxes, Beverly Douglas Jr.
Vanderbilt Law Review
It is often stated that a plaintiff cannot recover in replevin' or detinue unless the defendant is in possession of the disputed goods at the commence- ment of the action. This requirement is fundamentally one of practicality. Since possession of the chattel is the primary object of an action for specific recovery, replevin is inappropriate unless the defendant is in a position to restore this possession to the plaintiff. But one may sometimes be able to put another in possession and have a duty to do so without himself having that combination of physical control and intent which the law …
Professor Kales And Common Law Remainders, Joseph W. Bingham
Professor Kales And Common Law Remainders, Joseph W. Bingham
Michigan Law Review
In an article in Vol. 22 of the Law Quarterly Review, Professor Albert M. Kales presents a reclassification of future interests in land, the salient feature of which is an attempt to overthrow the conventional conception of a contingent remainder as a future estate given, not presently, but on condition precedent, and to substitute an entirely new conception of his own. This effort, by its boldness and novelty commands something more than a mere passing mention. It is my purpose, first to present as briefly as is consistent with clearness what I conceive to be the common law theory of …