Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (25)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (10)
- Pepperdine University (8)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (7)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (6)
-
- Selected Works (6)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (6)
- University of Richmond (5)
- BLR (2)
- Columbia Law School (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- Roger Williams University (2)
- University of Colorado Law School (2)
- Ursinus College (2)
- Barry University School of Law (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Eastern Kentucky University (1)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (1)
- The University of Southern Mississippi (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Maine School of Law (1)
- University of Massachusetts School of Law (1)
- University of Montana (1)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (1)
- University of San Diego (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review (16)
- Scholarly Works (12)
- Pepperdine Law Review (8)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (5)
- Touro Law Review (5)
-
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (4)
- University of Richmond Law Review (4)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (4)
- Articles (3)
- Faculty Scholarship (3)
- All Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Business and Economics Faculty Publications (2)
- ExpressO (2)
- Law School Blogs (2)
- Martin A. Schwartz (2)
- NYLS Law Review (2)
- Air Quality Impacts from Oil and Gas Development (January 27) (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Irene Scharf (1)
- Jeffrey J. Rachlinski (1)
- Jorge E De Hoyos Walther (1)
- Katharine Van Tassel (1)
- LLM Theses and Essays (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (1)
- Law Librarian Scholarship (1)
- Master's Theses (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 91 - 99 of 99
Full-Text Articles in Law
Liability In Anglo-American Law For Damage Done By Chattels, Fowler V. Harper
Liability In Anglo-American Law For Damage Done By Chattels, Fowler V. Harper
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
A Synthesis Of The Law Of Misrepresentation, Fowler V. Harper, Mary Coate Mcneely
A Synthesis Of The Law Of Misrepresentation, Fowler V. Harper, Mary Coate Mcneely
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Wills - Statute Of Nonclaim As Bar To Contingent Claim
Wills - Statute Of Nonclaim As Bar To Contingent Claim
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff, the receiver of an insolvent state bank, filed a claim against the estate of deceased who had been a stockholder in the bank. The estate had been closed for twelve years when the claim was filed, the bank not having become insolvent until eight years after the decedent's death. The state constitution provided double liability for the stockholders of the bank to its creditors. Defendant urged that the claim was barred by the statute of nonclaim. Held, the claim is not barred, for the constitutional liability was not a "claim or demand, contingent or absolute," against the stockholder's …
Bills And Notes - Rights Of Holder Of Bill Against Drawee
Bills And Notes - Rights Of Holder Of Bill Against Drawee
Michigan Law Review
An employee of the plaintiff, payee of a check drawn on the defendant bank, indorsed the check without authority and cashed it, retaining the proceeds. The check was sent through the clearance to the defendant bank and charged to the drawer. The plaintiff brought suit against the bank by a complaint in the form of damages for the conversion of a check. It was adjudged for the plaintiff and the defendant appealed. On appeal, the plaintiff insisted that the payment of the check amounted to an acceptance by the defendant bank and that a liability to the plaintiff as payee …
Liability Without Fault And Proximate Cause, Fowler V. Harper
Liability Without Fault And Proximate Cause, Fowler V. Harper
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Limitation Of Actions-Effect Of Fraudulent Concealment
Limitation Of Actions-Effect Of Fraudulent Concealment
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff sued in equity for a money judgment on defendant's promissory notes. Defendant had fraudulently represented that her husband's estate was liable on these notes, inducing plaintiff to sue the estate and thus delay for more than six years in starting suit against defendant. Plaintiff had sued defendant at law on the notes, defendant had pleaded the statute of limitations, and plaintiff had discontinued. Held, that plaintiff could recover a money judgment in equity, since the remedy at law was barred by the statute of limitations. Dodds v. McColgan (N. Y. App. Div., 1930) 241 N. Y. S. 584.
Book Review. Rationale Of Proximate Cause By Leon Green, Fowler V. Harper
Book Review. Rationale Of Proximate Cause By Leon Green, Fowler V. Harper
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Quasi-Contractual Obligations Of Municipal Corporations, Jerome C. Knowlton
Quasi-Contractual Obligations Of Municipal Corporations, Jerome C. Knowlton
Articles
We have constructive fraud, constructive trusts, constructive notice, and why not constructive contract, a contractual obligation existing in contemplation of law, in the absence of any agreement express or implied from facts? With this apology we shall use the term quasi contract as covering an obligation created by law and enforceable by an action ex contractu. We are not for the present interested in the circumstances which may give rise to this obligation as between individuals; nor as between an individual and a private corporation, or quasi public corporation, so-called, as a railroad or other public utility. In these cases …
Contract Limitations Of The Common Carrier's Liability, Edwin C. Goddard
Contract Limitations Of The Common Carrier's Liability, Edwin C. Goddard
Articles
When Mr. Justice NELSON, in the New Jersey Steam Navigation Company v. Merchants Bank, speaking of the power of a common carrier by special agreement to restrict his obligation, said for the court: "We are unable to perceive any well founded objection to the restriction," he opened the way for an amount of litigation which, in volume and expense, both to carriers and shippers, scarcely finds its equal on any other question. The Supreme Court of North Carolina was well within the limit when it said: "The right of a common carrier to limit or diminish his general liability by …