Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Brown v. Board of Education (9)
- Civil rights in education (9)
- Separate but equal (9)
- Access to justice (3)
- Civility (3)
-
- Civility in public discourse (3)
- Hip hop (3)
- Incivility (3)
- Relational self-interest (3)
- ACE (2)
- Arkansas (2)
- Critical race theory (2)
- Hip Hop (2)
- Internet (2)
- Low-income (2)
- Media (2)
- Pandemic (2)
- Racism (2)
- Recidivism (2)
- Supreme court (2)
- "Voices for Justice" (1)
- A systematic analysis (1)
- A2J (1)
- AHR (1)
- Abusive (1)
- Access to firearms (1)
- Accountability (1)
- Active (1)
- Admissibility standards; Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals (1)
- Admission of Battered Woman Syndrome evidence; admission of Rape Trauma Syndrome evidence; Daubert standard; inadequacy of Battered Woman Syndrome methodology; scientific reliability of Battered Woman Syndrome; courts as gatekeepers of reliable scientific evidence; four factors of Daubert; social sciences; State v. Saldana; State v. Black; scientific reliability of Rape Trauma Syndrome; defense-oriented social science evidence; Black Rage; Black Rage defenses; (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 61 - 83 of 83
Full-Text Articles in Law
Gatekeeping Stress: The Science And Admissibility Of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, Edgar Garcia-Rill, Erica Beecher-Monas
Gatekeeping Stress: The Science And Admissibility Of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, Edgar Garcia-Rill, Erica Beecher-Monas
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
How Prospect Theory Can Improve Legal Counseling, John M.A. Dipippa
How Prospect Theory Can Improve Legal Counseling, John M.A. Dipippa
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Introduction: The Impact Of Science On Legal Decisions—What Can Social Science Tell The Courts And Lawyers?, Theresa M. Beiner
Introduction: The Impact Of Science On Legal Decisions—What Can Social Science Tell The Courts And Lawyers?, Theresa M. Beiner
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Tv Or Not Tv: The Telecast Of Appellate Arguments In Pennsylvania, Stephen J. Mcewen
Tv Or Not Tv: The Telecast Of Appellate Arguments In Pennsylvania, Stephen J. Mcewen
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
The Pennsylvania Superior Court began televising en banc oral arguments. The reception of this practice has been extremely positive. The essay discusses the development of televising oral arguments in Pennsylvania’s Superior Court.
Battered-Child Syndrome: Is It A Paradigm For A Child Of Embattled Divorce?, H. Patrick Stern M.D., Michael W. Mellon Ph.D., Beth O. Butler L.C.S.W., Suzanne E. Stroh R.N.P., Nicholas Long Ph.D., Jerry G. Jones M.D.
Battered-Child Syndrome: Is It A Paradigm For A Child Of Embattled Divorce?, H. Patrick Stern M.D., Michael W. Mellon Ph.D., Beth O. Butler L.C.S.W., Suzanne E. Stroh R.N.P., Nicholas Long Ph.D., Jerry G. Jones M.D.
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Challenge To Rural States Of Procedural Reform In High Conflict Custody Cases, Elizabeth Barker Brandt J.D.
The Challenge To Rural States Of Procedural Reform In High Conflict Custody Cases, Elizabeth Barker Brandt J.D.
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Building Multidisciplinary Professional Partnerships With The Court Of Behalf Of High-Conflict Divorcing Families And Their Children: Who Needs What Kind Of Help, Janet R. Johnston Ph.D.
Building Multidisciplinary Professional Partnerships With The Court Of Behalf Of High-Conflict Divorcing Families And Their Children: Who Needs What Kind Of Help, Janet R. Johnston Ph.D.
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Comprehensive Child Custody Evaluation—Ten Years Later, Robert L. Halon Ph.D.
The Comprehensive Child Custody Evaluation—Ten Years Later, Robert L. Halon Ph.D.
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Prevention Strategies To Protect Professionals And Families Involved In High-Conflict Divorce, Thomas E. Schact Psy.D.
Prevention Strategies To Protect Professionals And Families Involved In High-Conflict Divorce, Thomas E. Schact Psy.D.
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Guardian Ad Litem In Custody And Conflict Cases: Investigator, Champion, And Referee, Dana E. Prescott J.D.
The Guardian Ad Litem In Custody And Conflict Cases: Investigator, Champion, And Referee, Dana E. Prescott J.D.
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Qualifications Of The Techniques To Be Used By Judges, Attorneys, And Mental Health Professionals Who Deal The Children In High Conflict Divorce Cases, Barry Bricklin Ph.D., Gail Elliott Ph.D.
Qualifications Of The Techniques To Be Used By Judges, Attorneys, And Mental Health Professionals Who Deal The Children In High Conflict Divorce Cases, Barry Bricklin Ph.D., Gail Elliott Ph.D.
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Professionals' Perceptions Of Divorce Involving Children, H. Patrick Stern M.D., Pippa Simpson Ph.D., Trevor Gage M.D., Kim Worley M.D.
Professionals' Perceptions Of Divorce Involving Children, H. Patrick Stern M.D., Pippa Simpson Ph.D., Trevor Gage M.D., Kim Worley M.D.
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Family Law—Petitions To Change A Minor Child's Surname: Arkansas Supreme Court Adopts "Clearly Erroneous" Standard Of Review And Establishes Six-Factor Test. Huffman V. Fisher, 337 Ark. 58, 987 S.W.2d 269 (1999)., Luke Zakrzewski
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Contentious Divorce: The Rocky Path To The Child's Best Interests, Michael S. Jellinek M.D., Kate Erwin M.D., Alexa Bagnell M.D.
Contentious Divorce: The Rocky Path To The Child's Best Interests, Michael S. Jellinek M.D., Kate Erwin M.D., Alexa Bagnell M.D.
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
In The Best Interest Of The Child: A Commentary, Lawrence H. Diller M.D.
In The Best Interest Of The Child: A Commentary, Lawrence H. Diller M.D.
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Promoting The Best Interests Of Children Whose Parents Are Divorcing: The Next Steps For Arkansas, Kenneth S. Gallant J.D.
Promoting The Best Interests Of Children Whose Parents Are Divorcing: The Next Steps For Arkansas, Kenneth S. Gallant J.D.
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Evolving Judicial Role In Child Custody Disputes: From Fault Finder To Conflict Manager To Differential Case Management, Andrew Schepard J.D.
The Evolving Judicial Role In Child Custody Disputes: From Fault Finder To Conflict Manager To Differential Case Management, Andrew Schepard J.D.
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Child Maltreatment And Endangerment In The Context Of Divorce, Kathleen Coulborn Faller Ph.D.
Child Maltreatment And Endangerment In The Context Of Divorce, Kathleen Coulborn Faller Ph.D.
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Agenda Setting In The Courts Of Appeals: The Effect Of Ideology On En Banc Rehearings, Phil Zarone
Agenda Setting In The Courts Of Appeals: The Effect Of Ideology On En Banc Rehearings, Phil Zarone
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
Intermediate appellate courts hear whatever case is brought before them on appeal. Therefore, the courts are unable to set an agenda through selecting which cases to hear. Appellate courts may be able to set an agenda, though, through en banc rehearings. This article discusses how courts of appeals decide when to grant en banc proceedings and the effect of ideological use of en banc rehearings.
Establishing Deliberative Democracy: Moving From Misery To Poverty With Dignity, Irwin P. Stotzky
Establishing Deliberative Democracy: Moving From Misery To Poverty With Dignity, Irwin P. Stotzky
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
An Unfirm Foundation: The Regrettable Indefensibility Of Religious Exemptions, Frederick Mark Gedicks
An Unfirm Foundation: The Regrettable Indefensibility Of Religious Exemptions, Frederick Mark Gedicks
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Power Outage: Amplifying The Analysis Of Power In Legal Relations (With Special Application To Unconscionability And Arbitration), Michael Hunter Schwartz
Power Outage: Amplifying The Analysis Of Power In Legal Relations (With Special Application To Unconscionability And Arbitration), Michael Hunter Schwartz
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Rico—Economic Motive Unnecessary For The Proof Of An Enterprise. National Organization Of Women, Inc. V. Scheidler, 114 S. Ct. 798 (1994)., Bryan W. Riley
Rico—Economic Motive Unnecessary For The Proof Of An Enterprise. National Organization Of Women, Inc. V. Scheidler, 114 S. Ct. 798 (1994)., Bryan W. Riley
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.