Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law

PDF

2015

Copyright

Institution
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 61 - 90 of 174

Full-Text Articles in Law

The Proper Scope Of The Copyright And Patent Power, Robert Patrick Merges, Glenn Harlan Reynolds May 2015

The Proper Scope Of The Copyright And Patent Power, Robert Patrick Merges, Glenn Harlan Reynolds

Robert P Merges

No abstract provided.


The End Of Friction - Property Rights And Contract In The Newton World Of On-Line Commerce, Robert P. Merges May 2015

The End Of Friction - Property Rights And Contract In The Newton World Of On-Line Commerce, Robert P. Merges

Robert P Merges

No abstract provided.


Awareness And Perception Of Copyright Among Teaching Faculty At Canadian Universities, Lisa Di Valentino May 2015

Awareness And Perception Of Copyright Among Teaching Faculty At Canadian Universities, Lisa Di Valentino

FIMS Presentations

In this talk I discuss the results of a survey of Canadian university faculty members undertaken from October to December 2014. The survey sought to determine teaching faculty awareness of copyright law and institutional policy and training, and how they would respond in various scenarios.

Analysis of the results suggests that while faculty members are aware of the existence of their institution's copyright policy, much fewer know whether their institution offers training. Of those who do know about training, only one-third have attended. However, faculty who have attended copyright training find that their knowledge is enhanced by the experience.

It …


Rethinking Intangible Cultural Heritage And Expressions Of Folklore: A Lesson From The Fcc’S Localism Standards, Jon M. Garon May 2015

Rethinking Intangible Cultural Heritage And Expressions Of Folklore: A Lesson From The Fcc’S Localism Standards, Jon M. Garon

Faculty Scholarship

This article reviews the underlying societal imperatives reflected in a policy of intangible cultural heritage and the intellectual property-like regimes being developed to protect these interests. It contrasts UNESCO efforts with more narrowly tailored efforts of WIPO and juxtaposes those approaches with the localism model developed under the FCC. While aspects of the WIPO protection efforts focusing on trademark-like and trade secret-like protections benefit the people and cultures these policies hope to serve, additional copyright-like protections will likely do more harm than good. Instead, global public policy will be far better served through emphasis on the FCC's localism attributes of …


Localism As A Production Imperative: An Alternative Framework To Promoting Intangible Cultural Heritage And Expressions Of Folklore, Jon M. Garon May 2015

Localism As A Production Imperative: An Alternative Framework To Promoting Intangible Cultural Heritage And Expressions Of Folklore, Jon M. Garon

Faculty Scholarship

In the United States, the policy of localism – the legislative goal of fostering local community expression and competence to deliver local content – finds its home in the Telecommunications Act rather than either the Copyright Act or Trademark Act. Other nations have introduced values of localism into trade policy, content distribution rules, and international efforts to protect intangible cultural heritage and expressions of folklore.

Jurisdictions in every continent are struggling to address the pressures of globalism through efforts to protect indigenous peoples’ and minority communities’ languages and culture. These efforts take many forms. Nations have introduced efforts to protect …


Vol. 6 No. 2, Spring 2015; A Circuit Split Involving Ten Federal Circuits: Why Copyright Infringement Actions Should Be Allowed To Proceed After An Application For A Copyright Is Filed, Morgan Johnson May 2015

Vol. 6 No. 2, Spring 2015; A Circuit Split Involving Ten Federal Circuits: Why Copyright Infringement Actions Should Be Allowed To Proceed After An Application For A Copyright Is Filed, Morgan Johnson

Northern Illinois Law Review Supplement

In 2010, the Supreme Court’s decision of Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. Muchnick addressed the subject matter jurisdiction of a trademark infringement claim. Not only did this avoid the larger question of when a trademark is “registered” under § 411(a), but it lead to further division among the circuit courts. Section 411(a) sets forth the requirements for a trademark infringement suit to be filed; most importantly that it must be “registered.” The registration approach has determined that a trademark is only registered when a party receives an affirmative or negative response, directly from the Copyright Office. The application approach, however, finds …


Richard Prince, Author Of The Catcher In The Rye: Transforming Fair Use Analysis, Brockenbrough A. Lamb May 2015

Richard Prince, Author Of The Catcher In The Rye: Transforming Fair Use Analysis, Brockenbrough A. Lamb

University of Richmond Law Review

No abstract provided.


A Fresh Look At Tests For Nonliteral Copyright Infringement, Pamela Samuelson Apr 2015

A Fresh Look At Tests For Nonliteral Copyright Infringement, Pamela Samuelson

Pamela Samuelson

Determining whether a copyright has been infringed is often straightforward in cases involving verbatim copying or slavish imitation. But when there are no literal similarities between the works at issue, ruling on infringement claims becomes more difficult. The Second and Ninth Circuits have developed five similar yet distinct tests for judging nonliteral copyright infringement. This Essay argues that each of these tests is flawed and that courts have generally failed to provide clear guidance about which test to apply in which kinds of cases. This Essay offers seven specific strategies to improve the analysis of nonliteral infringements. Courts should do …


Copyright And Freedom Of Expression In Historical Perspective, Pamela Samuelson Apr 2015

Copyright And Freedom Of Expression In Historical Perspective, Pamela Samuelson

Pamela Samuelson

No abstract provided.


Why Copyright Law Excludes Systems And Processes From The Scope Of Its Protection, Pamela Samuelson Apr 2015

Why Copyright Law Excludes Systems And Processes From The Scope Of Its Protection, Pamela Samuelson

Pamela Samuelson

No abstract provided.


The Uneasy Case For Software Copyrights Revisited, Pamela Samuelson Apr 2015

The Uneasy Case For Software Copyrights Revisited, Pamela Samuelson

Pamela Samuelson

The author examines the case for copyrighting computer programs in relation to the 1970 article “The Uneasy Case for Copyright: A Study of Copyright in Books, Photocopies, and Computer Programs,” by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer. The number of programs registered with the Copyright office has reportedly bolstered Breyer's skepticism about such copyright. The risks posed by copyrighting programs were of concern to Breyer. Also assessed is the development of the software industry.


Brief Of Amicus Curiae Academic Authors And Legal Scholars In Support Of Defendants Appellees And Affirmance, Nos. 12-14676-Ff, 12-15147-Ff (April 25, 2013), David R. Hansen, Peter A. Jazsi, Pamela Samuelson, Jason Schultz, Rebecca Tushnet Apr 2015

Brief Of Amicus Curiae Academic Authors And Legal Scholars In Support Of Defendants Appellees And Affirmance, Nos. 12-14676-Ff, 12-15147-Ff (April 25, 2013), David R. Hansen, Peter A. Jazsi, Pamela Samuelson, Jason Schultz, Rebecca Tushnet

Pamela Samuelson

No abstract provided.


The Copyright Principles Project: Directions For Reform, Pamela Samuelson Apr 2015

The Copyright Principles Project: Directions For Reform, Pamela Samuelson

Pamela Samuelson

Evaluates the impact of the Copyrights Principles Project (CPP) 2007, which argues that US copyright law has to adapt to modern technological advances. Suggest that current copyright law does not serve well those it is trying to protect. [IBSSMB]


Computer Programs, User Interfaces, And Section 102(B) Of The Copyright Act Of 1976: A Critique Of Lotus V. Paperback, Pamela Samuelson Apr 2015

Computer Programs, User Interfaces, And Section 102(B) Of The Copyright Act Of 1976: A Critique Of Lotus V. Paperback, Pamela Samuelson

Pamela Samuelson

The Supreme Court's landmark ruling "Lotus Development Corp vs Paperback Software International" is critiqued. The ruling did not resolve the issue of whether copyright law protects user interfaces.


The Originality Standard For Literary Works Under U.S. Copyright Law, Pamela Samuelson Apr 2015

The Originality Standard For Literary Works Under U.S. Copyright Law, Pamela Samuelson

Pamela Samuelson

No abstract provided.


The U.S. Digital Agenda At Wipo, Pamela Samuelson Apr 2015

The U.S. Digital Agenda At Wipo, Pamela Samuelson

Pamela Samuelson

No abstract provided.


"Modern-Day Pirates: Examining The Legal Difficulties Of Copyright Enforcement", James L. Martherus Apr 2015

"Modern-Day Pirates: Examining The Legal Difficulties Of Copyright Enforcement", James L. Martherus

Brigham Young University Prelaw Review

No abstract provided.


Copyright As Contract, Jeffrey L. Harrison Apr 2015

Copyright As Contract, Jeffrey L. Harrison

UF Law Faculty Publications

Copyright is essentially a contract between the author and the public with the government acting as the agent of the public. The consideration received by authors is defined by duration and breadth of exclusivity. The consideration for the public is the creation of a "work" that will be available on a limited basis for the life of the author plus 70 years and then available without limit after that. If there were no transaction costs at all, it would be possible to "pay" authors different amounts of exclusivity. Perhaps a greeting card would get one holiday season of exclusivity, if …


Andy Warhol’S Pantry, Brian L. Frye Apr 2015

Andy Warhol’S Pantry, Brian L. Frye

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

This Article examines Andy Warhol’s use of food and food products as a metaphor for commerce and consumption. It observes that Warhol’s use of images and marks was often inconsistent with copyright and trademark doctrine, and suggests that the fair use doctrine should in-corporate a “Warhol test.”


Notice And Remedies In Copyright Licensing, B. J. Ard Apr 2015

Notice And Remedies In Copyright Licensing, B. J. Ard

Missouri Law Review

Copyright owners claim the power to designate practically any term of a copyright license as a “condition” enforceable in copyright. In doing so, these licensors purport to translate breach of the most trivial or idiosyncratic term into the basis for a copyright infringement suit. This Article argues that these licenses are most problematic when licensors provide inadequate notice of unexpected terms. License conditions are typically buried in boilerplate that no reasonable consumer reads, and licensors have few incentives to make them more salient. These circumstances not only threaten unwitting users with copyright liability, but also impede copyright’s own goals by …


International Copyright: Domestic Barriers To United States Participation In The Rome Convention On Neighboring Rights, Eric T. Johnson Mar 2015

International Copyright: Domestic Barriers To United States Participation In The Rome Convention On Neighboring Rights, Eric T. Johnson

Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law

No abstract provided.


Licensing Of Intellectual Property Rights, Mark Joelson Mar 2015

Licensing Of Intellectual Property Rights, Mark Joelson

Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law

No abstract provided.


Toward A "Digital Transfer Doctrine"? The First Sale Doctrine In The Digital Era, Sarah Reis Mar 2015

Toward A "Digital Transfer Doctrine"? The First Sale Doctrine In The Digital Era, Sarah Reis

Northwestern University Law Review

The first sale doctrine in copyright law allows a person who owns a copy of a copyrighted work to sell, lend, or give away the copy to someone else. An owner of a copy of a copyrighted work can take advantage of the first sale doctrine, but a licensee cannot. In today’s digital environment, people are increasingly purchasing digital music files and e-books instead of CDs and physical books. Customers often mistakenly believe they become owners of the digital content they purchase when in actuality they merely become licensees most of the time. Licensing agreements impose use restrictions on digital …


With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility: Gary Friedrich's Battle With Marvel For Artist Rights, Alexander L. Simon Mar 2015

With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility: Gary Friedrich's Battle With Marvel For Artist Rights, Alexander L. Simon

Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review

Recently, in Gary Friedrich Enterprises v. Marvel Characters, Inc., Gary Friedrich (“Friedrich”) sued Marvel Characters, Inc. (“Marvel”) for infringement on his copyright of the “Ghost Rider” comic book character. The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of Marvel stating that Friedrich had assigned any rights he had to Ghost Rider to Marvel in a work-for-hire agreement six years after the initial publication. Friedrich appealed this action in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. However, the Second Circuit remanded the case to the District Court for issues of fact, including the ambiguous terms of the work for-hire agreement, renewal rights …


The Zombie First Amendment, Julie E. Cohen Mar 2015

The Zombie First Amendment, Julie E. Cohen

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

Scholarly and popular critiques of contemporary free speech jurisprudence have noted an attitude of unquestioning deference to the political power of money. Rather than sheltering the ability to speak truth to power, they have lamented, the contemporary first amendment shelters power’s ability to make and propagate its own truth. This essay relates developments in recent first amendment jurisprudence to a larger struggle now underway to shape the distribution of information power in the era of informational capitalism. In particular, it argues that cases about political speech — cases that lie at the first amendment’s traditional core — tell only a …


A Preliminary Measure: Retroactive Copyright Term Reduction And The Takings Clause, Eugene V. Beliy Feb 2015

A Preliminary Measure: Retroactive Copyright Term Reduction And The Takings Clause, Eugene V. Beliy

Eugene V Beliy

The current duration of a copyright term under U.S. law is an astounding life of the author plus 70 years. This term length is a product of a series of retroactive extensions enacted by Congress. It is well settled that the term can be retroactively extended--but can it be retroactively reduced? Would Congress violate the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause if it retroactively reduced copyright term without providing just compensation? This paper argues that it would not. First, this paper frames the discussion by analyzing the policy behind Copyright Law and term length. Second, this paper identifies a potential Takings Clause …


Codes Of Best Practice For Fair Use, Denise George Feb 2015

Codes Of Best Practice For Fair Use, Denise George

Selections from the University Library Blog

No abstract provided.


Technological Neutrality: (Pre)Serving The Purposes Of Copyright Law, Carys J. Craig Feb 2015

Technological Neutrality: (Pre)Serving The Purposes Of Copyright Law, Carys J. Craig

Carys Craig

No abstract provided.


Fair Use: The Four Factors, Kathryn Michaelis Feb 2015

Fair Use: The Four Factors, Kathryn Michaelis

Selections from the University Library Blog

No abstract provided.


Locking Out Lawful Users: Fair Dealing And Anti-Circumvention In Bill C-32, Carys J. Craig Feb 2015

Locking Out Lawful Users: Fair Dealing And Anti-Circumvention In Bill C-32, Carys J. Craig

Carys Craig

This chapter examines the potential impact of the proposed fair dealing and anti-circumvention provisions in Canada’s most recent copyright reform bill, Bill C-32. I suggest that the minimal expansion of the fair dealing defence to cover “new” purposes, as well as the addition of a few new user exceptions, while welcome, is insufficient to ensure the breadth of user defences that the copyright balance demands. Moreover, the extensive protection of technological protection measures without any regard for lawful uses of copyright material has the potential to effectively eviscerate fair dealing in the digital age. Many acts permitted in relation to …