Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- ADA (1)
- American Disabilities Act (1)
- Caregiver (1)
- Connick v. Myers (1)
- EEOC (1)
-
- Elder law (1)
- Employee speech (1)
- FMLA (1)
- Family Medical Leave Act (1)
- Family responsibilities discrimination (1)
- Fathers (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Garcetti v. Ceballos (1)
- Gender stereotype (1)
- Management rights (1)
- Pickering v. Board of Education (1)
- Public employees (1)
- Sex-plus (1)
- Sexual discrimination (1)
- Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (1)
- Work family conflicts (1)
- Work life balance (1)
- Workplace discrimination (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Evolution Of “Fred”: Family Responsibilities Discrimination And Developments In The Law Of Stereotyping And Implicit Bias, Joan C. Williams, Stephanie Bornstein
The Evolution Of “Fred”: Family Responsibilities Discrimination And Developments In The Law Of Stereotyping And Implicit Bias, Joan C. Williams, Stephanie Bornstein
UF Law Faculty Publications
This Article integrates a discussion of current family responsibilities discrimination ("FRD") case law with a discussion of the single most important recent development in the field: the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s ("EEOC") 2007 issuance of Enforcement Guidance on caregiver discrimination. The Guidance concretely informs the public about what constitutes unlawful discrimination against caregivers under Title VII and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Specifically, the Guidance crystallizes two key holdings from case law in regard to Title VII disparate treatment claims brought by caregivers: (1) where plaintiffs have evidence of gender stereotyping, they can make out a prima facie case …
Employee Speech & Management Rights: A Counterintuitive Reading Of Garcetti V. Ceballos, Elizabeth Dale
Employee Speech & Management Rights: A Counterintuitive Reading Of Garcetti V. Ceballos, Elizabeth Dale
UF Law Faculty Publications
In the two years since the decision came down, courts and commentators generally have agreed that the Supreme Court's decision in Garcetti v. Ceballos sharply limited the First Amendment rights of public employees. In this Article, I argue that this widely shared interpretation overstates the case. The Court in Garcetti did not dramatically change the way it analyzed public employees' First Amendment rights. Instead, it restated the principles on which those claims rest, emphasizing management rights and the unconstitutional conditions doctrine. By making those two theories the centerpiece of the decision, the Court in Garcetti defined public employee speech rights …