Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of New Mexico (14)
- St. Mary's University (11)
- UIC School of Law (11)
- American University Washington College of Law (9)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (4)
-
- University of Michigan Law School (4)
- William & Mary Law School (2)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- University of Miami Law School (1)
- University of San Diego (1)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- St. Mary’s Law Journal (9)
- St. Mary’s University School of Law (9)
- Constitution (4)
- District of Columbia (4)
- Voting rights (3)
-
- Civil rights (2)
- Congress (2)
- Constitutional right to vote (2)
- Department of Justice (2)
- Judicial restraint (2)
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Legislation (2)
- Lochner v. New York (2)
- Race (2)
- Right to vote (2)
- Shaw v. Reno (2)
- Supreme Court (2)
- United States Supreme Court (2)
- 18 U.S.C. § 245 (1)
- 2 U.S.C. § 2c (1)
- 2 U.S.C. § 5 (1)
- Abandoning single-member districting (1)
- Abuse of discretion standard. (1)
- Accountability (1)
- Activities substantially affecting commerce (1)
- Adam J. Cohen (1)
- Adarand Constructors Inc. v. Pena (1)
- Administrative Procedure Act (1)
- Administrative state (1)
- Affirmative action (1)
- Publication
-
- United States - Mexico Law Journal (1993-2005) (14)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (11)
- UIC Law Review (11)
- American University Law Review (9)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (4)
-
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- BYU Law Review (1)
- Dalhousie Law Journal (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (1)
- San Diego Law Review (1)
- Seattle University Law Review (1)
- Touro Law Review (1)
- University of Miami Inter-American Law Review (1)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (1)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (1)
- William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice (1)
- William & Mary Law Review (1)
Articles 61 - 63 of 63
Full-Text Articles in Law
Is The Excessive Fines Clause Excessively Kind To Money Launderers, Drug Dealers, And Tax Evaders, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 243 (1999), Ann Jennings Maron
Is The Excessive Fines Clause Excessively Kind To Money Launderers, Drug Dealers, And Tax Evaders, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 243 (1999), Ann Jennings Maron
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Splitting The Atom Or Splitting Hairs - The Hate Crimes Prevention Act Of 1999 Note., Andrew M. Gilbert, Eric D. Marchand
Splitting The Atom Or Splitting Hairs - The Hate Crimes Prevention Act Of 1999 Note., Andrew M. Gilbert, Eric D. Marchand
St. Mary's Law Journal
Problems of bias-motivated violence plague our nation and threaten to erase the progress made during the civil rights era. Recent statistical surveys conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) indicate the number of hate crimes has generally increased over the past few years. In 1996, over 11,000 individuals were victims of hate crimes—five percent more than reported the previous year. Hate crimes are not only injurious to the individual victim, but also fracture surrounding communities and create disharmony among citizens. As a result, some states implemented legislation in the 1980s to deter hate-motived crimes and a few states have …
Keeping The Promise: Establishing Nontransferable Election Systems In Jurisdictions Covered By Section Four Of The Voting Rights Act., Adam J. Cohen
Keeping The Promise: Establishing Nontransferable Election Systems In Jurisdictions Covered By Section Four Of The Voting Rights Act., Adam J. Cohen
St. Mary's Law Journal
Jurisdictions covered by the Voting Rights Act (VRA or the Act) need to impose multimember districting and non-transferable election systems. The VRA was enacted in 1965 to enforce the promise of the Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution: the right to vote shall not be abridged on the basis of race. The Act requires any change in election procedures to be approved in advance so that states are not able to continuously disenfranchise voters based on race by simply changing election procedures. Either the District Court for the District of Columbia or the Attorney General of the United States …