Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (8)
- William & Mary Law School (4)
- American University Washington College of Law (3)
- Boston University School of Law (3)
- Duke Law (3)
-
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (3)
- Cornell University Law School (2)
- Florida International University College of Law (2)
- Georgetown University Law Center (2)
- University of Colorado Law School (2)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (2)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (2)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Santa Clara Law (1)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (1)
- UC Law SF (1)
- University of Dayton (1)
- University of Miami Law School (1)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- Wayne State University (1)
- Keyword
-
- Jurisdiction (15)
- Judicial review (3)
- Civil Procedure (2)
- Common law (2)
- Due process (2)
-
- Economics (2)
- Judges (2)
- Law (2)
- Legal history (2)
- Adjudicative jurisdiction (1)
- Administrative agencies – rules and practice (1)
- Administrative procedure (1)
- Adoption (1)
- Aggression (1)
- And Define and Punish Clause (1)
- Antarctica; Australia; Maritime law; Whaling (1)
- Appeals (1)
- Appellate Courts (1)
- Appellate Practice (1)
- Apportionment (1)
- Aramco (1)
- Arbitration (1)
- Arbitration agreements (1)
- Arbitration rules (1)
- Armed attack (1)
- Article 8 (1)
- Article III (1)
- Bankruptcy Clause (1)
- Bankruptcy exceptionalism (1)
- Bankruptcy reform (1)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (9)
- Faculty Publications (7)
- NULR Online (6)
- Articles (4)
- All Faculty Scholarship (3)
-
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (2)
- Faculty Articles (2)
- Faculty Working Papers (2)
- Publications (2)
- Amicus Briefs (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Working Papers (1)
- Cornell Law School Berger International Speaker Papers (1)
- Faculty Works (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (1)
- School of Law Faculty Publications (1)
- U.S. Supreme Court Briefs (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 47
Full-Text Articles in Law
A Unified Theory Of 28 U.S.C. Section 1331 Jurisdiction, Lumen N. Mulligan
A Unified Theory Of 28 U.S.C. Section 1331 Jurisdiction, Lumen N. Mulligan
Faculty Works
Title 28, section 1331 of the United States Code provides the jurisdictional grounding for the majority of cases heard in the federal courts, yet it is not well understood. The predominant view holds that section 1331 doctrine both lacks a focus upon congressional intent and is internally inconsistent. I seek to counter both these assumptions by re-contextualizing the Court's section 1331 jurisprudence in terms of the contemporary judicial usage of right (i.e., clear, mandatory obligations capable of judicial enforcement) and cause of action (i.e., permission to vindicate a right in court). In conducting this reinterpretation, I argue that section 1331 …
What Is The Erie Doctrine? (And What Does It Mean For The Contemporary Politics Of Judicial Federalism?), Adam N. Steinman
What Is The Erie Doctrine? (And What Does It Mean For The Contemporary Politics Of Judicial Federalism?), Adam N. Steinman
Faculty Scholarship
As when Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins was decided seventy years ago, federal courts today are seen as more favorable to corporate and business interests than many of their state-court brethren. The current situation is due in no small part to federal courts' comparatively pro-defendant approaches to summary judgment, class certification, and other procedural issues. The Court's decision in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, which tilts federal pleading standards in favor of defendants, will likely have similar federalism implications. This Article presents a straightforward argument that the Erie doctrine may require federal courts to follow state-law standards on summary judgment, …
On Jurisdictional Elephants And Kangaroo Courts, Stephen I. Vladeck
On Jurisdictional Elephants And Kangaroo Courts, Stephen I. Vladeck
NULR Online
No abstract provided.
Judicial Foreign Policy: Lessons From The 1790s, David Sloss
Judicial Foreign Policy: Lessons From The 1790s, David Sloss
Faculty Publications
This Article demonstrates that the exclusive political control thesis is incompatible with the original understanding of the Founders. The Article does not defend originalism as a method of constitutional interpretation; it merely shows that the exclusive political control thesis is inconsistent with an originalist approach.
The Article examines the implementation of U.S. neutrality policy in the period from 1793 to 1797. Other scholars have analyzed the initial formulation of U.S. neutrality policy in 1793. Scholars who focus narrowly on the year 1793, when the United States first articulated its neutrality policy, have concluded that "the federal courts played a relatively …
The Supreme Common Law Court Of The United States, Jack M. Beermann
The Supreme Common Law Court Of The United States, Jack M. Beermann
Faculty Scholarship
The U.S. Supreme Court's primary role in the history of the United States, especially in constitutional cases (and cases hovering in the universe of the Constitution), has been to limit Congress's ability to redefine and redistribute rights in a direction most people would characterize as liberal. In other words, the Supreme Court, for most of the history of the United States since the adoption of the Constitution, has been a conservative force against change and redistribution. The Court has used five distinct devices to advance its control over the law. First, it has construed rights-creating constitutional provisions narrowly when those …
The Influence Of Ex Parte Quirin And Courts-Martial On Military Commissions, Morris D. Davis
The Influence Of Ex Parte Quirin And Courts-Martial On Military Commissions, Morris D. Davis
NULR Online
No abstract provided.
False Sanctuary: The Australian Antarctic Whale Sanctuary And Long-Term Stability In Antarctica, Donald K. Anton
False Sanctuary: The Australian Antarctic Whale Sanctuary And Long-Term Stability In Antarctica, Donald K. Anton
Cornell Law School Berger International Speaker Papers
The recent assertion of maritime adjudicative jurisdiction by Australian courts over a Japanese whaling company for acts contrary to Australian law in the Antarctic Southern Ocean is alarming. Private litigation, based on an internationally disputed claim to sovereignty over Antarctic territory and a further contested claim to an EEZ appurtenant to that territory, ought not to serve as a proxy for cooperative (and hopefully effective) international management of the Antarctic environment. The big danger is that if other states follow Australia's lead in claiming sovereign rights and exercising attendant jurisdiction the chances of natural resource over-exploitation and environmental harm in …
No Third Class Processes For Foreigners, Benjamin G. Davis
No Third Class Processes For Foreigners, Benjamin G. Davis
NULR Online
No abstract provided.
Beyond Guantánamo, Obstacles And Options (Part Ii), Gregory S. Mcneal
Beyond Guantánamo, Obstacles And Options (Part Ii), Gregory S. Mcneal
NULR Online
No abstract provided.
Beyond Guantánamo, Obstacles And Options, Gregory S. Mcneal
Beyond Guantánamo, Obstacles And Options, Gregory S. Mcneal
NULR Online
No abstract provided.
Taking Distribution Seriously, Robert C. Hockett
Taking Distribution Seriously, Robert C. Hockett
Cornell Law Faculty Working Papers
It is common for legal theorists and policy analysts to think and communicate mainly in maximizing terms. What is less common is for them to notice that each time we speak explicitly of socially maximizing one thing, we speak implicitly of distributing another thing and equalizing yet another thing. We also, moreover, effectively define ourselves and our fellow citizens by reference to that which we equalize; for it is in virtue of the latter that our social welfare formulations treat us as “counting” for purposes of socially aggregating and maximizing.
To attend systematically to the inter-translatability of maximization language on …
Rethinking Tax Nexus And Apportionment: Voice, Exit, And The Dormant Commerce Clause, Edward A. Zelinsky
Rethinking Tax Nexus And Apportionment: Voice, Exit, And The Dormant Commerce Clause, Edward A. Zelinsky
Faculty Articles
The dormant Commerce Clause concept of tax nexus is best understood as a rough, but serviceable, proxy for the taxpayer's standing in the political process. This perspective leads me to defend Quill Corporation v. North Dakota and the much maligned physical presence test for tax nexus. As a matter of legislative policy, the critics of this test may be correct. However, as a matter of constitutional law, the courts should adhere to an expanded physical presence standard as Congress crafts for the long term broader nexus rules based on economic presence. Taxation is an inherently and irreducibly political matter. An …
Tax Incentives For Economic Development: Personal (And Pessimistic) Reflections, Edward A. Zelinsky
Tax Incentives For Economic Development: Personal (And Pessimistic) Reflections, Edward A. Zelinsky
Faculty Articles
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Law Professors As Amici Curiae In Support Of Respondents, Summers V. Earth Island Inst., No. 07-463 (U.S. June 27, 2008), Richard J. Lazarus, Amanda C. Leiter, David C. Vladeck
Brief Of Law Professors As Amici Curiae In Support Of Respondents, Summers V. Earth Island Inst., No. 07-463 (U.S. June 27, 2008), Richard J. Lazarus, Amanda C. Leiter, David C. Vladeck
U.S. Supreme Court Briefs
No abstract provided.
Non-Signatories And The New York Convention, William W. Park
Non-Signatories And The New York Convention, William W. Park
Faculty Scholarship
In the context of arbitrations subject to the New York Convention, the term ,non-signatory' might evoke several lines of inquiry. Must commitments to arbitrate be signed? What legal framework guides decision-making about who agreed to arbitrate? How should courts monitor an arbitrator's assertion of jurisdiction over someone who never signed an arbitration agreement?
The second of these matters - rules about who agreed to arbitrate - will retain our attention in this paper. While few commentators deny that arbitration rests on consent,1 less unanimity exists about what exactly constitutes such consent when one side contests that it ever waived …
The Sentencing Commission Takes On Crack, Again, David Yellen
The Sentencing Commission Takes On Crack, Again, David Yellen
Articles
We may be entering a new era of drug sentencing policy. For the first time, an effort by the United States Sentencing Commission to reduce the disparity in treatment between crack and powder cocaine offenders by somewhat reducing crack sentences has succeeded. Decisions of the United States Supreme Court, culminating most recently in Kimbrough v. United States and Gall v. United States, have clarified and expanded the flexibility federal judges have in sentencing under the post- United States v. Booker advisory sentencing guidelines. Political leaders have begun to accept the need for relaxation of at least some of the …
The Failure Of Bowles V. Russell, Scott Dodson
The Failure Of Bowles V. Russell, Scott Dodson
Faculty Publications
The Supreme Court recently decided Bowles v. Russell—perhaps that Term’s most underrated case—which characterized the time to file a civil notice of appeal as jurisdictional and therefore not subject to equitable excuses for noncompliance. In so holding, the Court overstated the supporting precedent, inflated the jurisdictional importance of statutes, and undermined an important recent movement to clarify when a rule is jurisdictional and when it is not. This did not have to be. The Court missed a golden opportunity to chart a middle course—holding the rule mandatory but nonjurisdictional—that would have been more consistent with precedent while resolving the …
The Jurisdictional Time Limit For An Appeal: The Worst Kind Of Deadline—Except For All Others*, E. King Poor
The Jurisdictional Time Limit For An Appeal: The Worst Kind Of Deadline—Except For All Others*, E. King Poor
NULR Online
No abstract provided.
Is Transnational Litigation A Distinct Field? The Persistence Of American Exceptionalism In Procedural Law, Paul R. Dubinsky
Is Transnational Litigation A Distinct Field? The Persistence Of American Exceptionalism In Procedural Law, Paul R. Dubinsky
Law Faculty Research Publications
No abstract provided.
Prosecuting Aggression, Noah Weisbord
Prosecuting Aggression, Noah Weisbord
Faculty Publications
The Assembly of States Parties to the International Criminal Court will soon have its first opportunity to revise the Rome Statute and activate the latent crime of aggression, which awaits a definition of its elements and conditions for the exercise of jurisdiction. The working group charged with drafting a provision is scheduled to complete its task by 2008 or 2009, one year before the International Criminal Court’s first review conference.
Beginning with a history of the crime meant to put the current negotiations in the context of past initiatives, this article sets out the status of the negotiations and begins …
Jurisdiction, Merits, And Procedure: Thoughts On A Trichotomy, Howard M. Wasserman
Jurisdiction, Merits, And Procedure: Thoughts On A Trichotomy, Howard M. Wasserman
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Beyond The Article I Horizon: Congress’S Enumerated Powers And Universal Jurisdiction Over Drug Crimes, Eugene Kontorovich
Beyond The Article I Horizon: Congress’S Enumerated Powers And Universal Jurisdiction Over Drug Crimes, Eugene Kontorovich
Faculty Working Papers
This paper explores the Article I limits faced by Congress in exercising universal jurisdiction (UJ) – that is, regulating extraterritorial conduct by foreigners with no affect on or connection the U.S. While UJ is becoming increasingly popular in Europe for the punishment of human rights offenses, Congress's primary use of UJ today is under the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act. This obscure law allows the U.S. to punish for violating U.S. drug laws foreign defendants on foreign vessels in international waters. The MDLEA's UJ provisions raise fundamental questions about the source and extent of Congress's constitutional power to regulate purely …
Brief Of Law Professors As Amici Curiae In Support Of Respondents, Summers V. Earthisland Inst., No. 07-463 (U.S. June 27, 2008), Amanda Leiter
Brief Of Law Professors As Amici Curiae In Support Of Respondents, Summers V. Earthisland Inst., No. 07-463 (U.S. June 27, 2008), Amanda Leiter
Amicus Briefs
No abstract provided.
Taking Liberties: The Personal Jurisdiction Of Military Commissions, Madeline Morris
Taking Liberties: The Personal Jurisdiction Of Military Commissions, Madeline Morris
Faculty Scholarship
On September 11, 2001, Al Qaeda operatives attacked civilian and military targets on US territory, causing thousands of deaths and billions of dollars of economic loss. The next day, the United Nations Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution 1368 characterizing the attack by Al Qaeda as a "threat to international peace and security" and recognizing the right of states to use armed force in self defense.
Justice Scalia’S “Renegade Jurisdiction”: Lessons For Patent Law Reform, Xuan-Thao Nguyen
Justice Scalia’S “Renegade Jurisdiction”: Lessons For Patent Law Reform, Xuan-Thao Nguyen
Articles
Justice Scalia called the Eastern District of Texas ("EDTX") the "renegade jurisdiction." Critics label it the "rocket-docket" for patents. All blame it on the ills of patent litigation, demanding for national reform. This Article challenges the prevailing myths with an empirical quantitative study of more than 27,000 patent cases filed in the last decade and a qualitative study on patent forum shopping. This Article contends that the proposed venue reforms will not prevent litigants from shopping for a favorable forum in which to resolve patent litigations. This Article suggests that instead of the quick fixes vis-à-vis proposed venue reform legislation …
Judicial Compensation And The Definition Of Judicial Power In The Early Republic, James E. Pfander
Judicial Compensation And The Definition Of Judicial Power In The Early Republic, James E. Pfander
Faculty Working Papers
Article III's provision for the compensation of federal judges has been much celebrated for the no-diminution provision that forecloses judicial pay cuts. But other features of Article III's compensation provision have largely escaped notice. In particular, little attention has been paid to the framers' apparent expectation that Congress would compensate federal judges with salaries alone, payable from the treasury at stated times. Article III's presumption in favor of salary-based compensation may rule out fee-based compensation, which was a common form of judicial compensation in England and the colonies but had grown controversial by the time of the framing. Among other …
Subject Matter Jurisdiction, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Subject Matter Jurisdiction, Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Amending The Exceptions Clause, Joseph Blocher
Amending The Exceptions Clause, Joseph Blocher
Faculty Scholarship
Jurisdiction stripping is the new constitutional amendment, and the Exceptions Clause is the new Article V. But despite legal academia’s long-running obsessions with the meaning of constitutional amendment and the limits (if any) on Congress’s power to control federal jurisdiction, we still lack even a basic understanding of how these two forms of constitutional politicking interact. As legislators increasingly propose and pass jurisdiction-stripping legislation and pursue politically charged constitutional amendments, these constitutional processes have begun to step off of the pages of law reviews and into the halls of Congress. The looming collision between them makes it all the more …
The Accounting: Habeas Corpus And Enemy Combatants, Emily Calhoun
The Accounting: Habeas Corpus And Enemy Combatants, Emily Calhoun
Publications
The judiciary should impose a heavy burden of justification on the executive when a habeas petitioner challenges the accuracy of facts on which an enemy combatant designation rests. A heavy burden of justification will ensure that the essential institutional purposes of the writ--and legitimate, separated-powers government--are preserved, even during times of national exigency. The institutional purposes of the writ argue for robust judicial review rather than deference to the executive. Moreover, the procedural flexibility traditionally associated with the writ gives the judiciary the tools to ensure that a heavy burden of justification can be imposed.
A Truism With Attitude: The Tenth Amendment In Constitutional Context, Gary S. Lawson
A Truism With Attitude: The Tenth Amendment In Constitutional Context, Gary S. Lawson
Faculty Scholarship
The Tenth Amendment is caught in a crossfire hurricane. From one direction, it is dismissed as "but a truism"' with no significant constitutional function. From another direction, its unassuming language- "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people" 2-has inspired Byzantine doctrines concerning such matters as federal commandeering of state institutions,3 conditions on federal spending programs implemented by states,4 and federal regulation of state governmental institutions. 5 The Tenth Amendment thus appears to be either the constitutional equivalent of a …