Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (7)
- University of Michigan Law School (6)
- UIC School of Law (3)
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- Florida State University College of Law (2)
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- Notre Dame Law School (2)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- Selected Works (1)
- SelectedWorks (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (1)
- University of Colorado Law School (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of Miami Law School (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (1)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (1)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Jurisdiction (8)
- Constitutional history (4)
- Judicial review (4)
- Federalism (3)
- 1755-1835 (2)
-
- Centralization (2)
- Federal courts (2)
- Federal law (2)
- International Criminal Court (2)
- John Marshall (2)
- State law (2)
- Territorial jurisdiction (2)
- United States (2)
- Abstention (1)
- Administrative law (1)
- Al v. George (1)
- Alexander v. Daley (1)
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. Hague (1)
- Amount in controversy (1)
- Bankruptcy Law; Bankruptcy; Credit; Jurisdiction; Letters of Credit (1)
- Beale (Joseph) (1)
- Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. King (1)
- Blocked exchange (1)
- Blocking (1)
- Boundary (1)
- Bowers v. Hardwick (1)
- Brown v. Board of Education (1)
- Brussels Convention (1)
- Burford doctrine (1)
- COMEX (1)
- Publication
-
- Washington and Lee Law Review (7)
- Articles (5)
- Michigan Law Review (5)
- UIC Law Review (3)
- Faculty Scholarship (2)
-
- Federal Communications Law Journal (2)
- Florida State University Journal of Transnational Law & Policy (2)
- Journal Articles (2)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (1)
- Bartram Brown (1)
- Circuit Court Opinions (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Graydon S. Staring (1)
- Human Rights Brief (1)
- LLM Theses (1)
- Maryland Journal of International Law (1)
- Publications (1)
- Richmond Journal of Law & Technology (1)
- Scholarly Works (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 44 of 44
Full-Text Articles in Law
Federal Circuit's Forgotten Lessons: Annealing New Forms Of Intellectual Property Through Consolidated Appellate Jurisdiction, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 581 (1999), Chris J. Katopis
Federal Circuit's Forgotten Lessons: Annealing New Forms Of Intellectual Property Through Consolidated Appellate Jurisdiction, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 581 (1999), Chris J. Katopis
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Nomadic Notaries, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 985 (1999), Malcolm L. Morris
Nomadic Notaries, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 985 (1999), Malcolm L. Morris
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
State Immunity Waivers For Suits By The United States, Evan H. Caminker
State Immunity Waivers For Suits By The United States, Evan H. Caminker
Articles
The Supreme Court closed this millennium with a virtual celebration of state sovereignty, protecting state authority from the reach of congressional power in several significant ways. In a pair of cases, Seminole Tribe v. Florida1 and Alden v. Maine,2 the Court held that states enjoy a constitutional immunity from being sued without their consent. In Seminole Tribe, the Court opined that "the background principle of state sovereign immunity embodied in the Eleventh Amendment"3 protects states from unconsented suits in federal court. In Alden, the Court held that this principle is not merely embodied in the Eleventh Amendment but rather is …
The Use Of Preclusion Doctrine, Antisuit Injunctions, And Forum Non Conveniens Dismissals In Transnational Intellectual Property Litigation, Peter Nicolas
Articles
Conflicting standards among the federal circuits over the applicability of inherent powers in the transnational intellectual property context and the divided authority regarding the jurisdiction of U.S. federal courts over foreign intellectual property claims severely hamper the ability of federal district courts to use these tools in such a manner so as to prevent parties in transnational intellectual property suits from engaging in strategic behavior. This Comment seeks to reconcile these conflicts where possible and, where irreconcilable, to demonstrate that the text and history of federal statutes conferring subject matter jurisdiction on federal courts and placing limits on their issuance …
Democracy And Disenfranchisement In Washington, D.C., Jamin B. Raskin, Cathleen Caron
Democracy And Disenfranchisement In Washington, D.C., Jamin B. Raskin, Cathleen Caron
Human Rights Brief
No abstract provided.
Association Of American Law Schools Panel On The International Criminal Court, Christopher L. Blakesley
Association Of American Law Schools Panel On The International Criminal Court, Christopher L. Blakesley
Scholarly Works
Professor Blakesley participates in this panel discussion on the International Criminal Court. The Association of American Law Schools sponsored the panel.
Chevron, Cooperative Federalism, And Telecommunications Reform, Philip J. Weiser
Chevron, Cooperative Federalism, And Telecommunications Reform, Philip J. Weiser
Publications
No abstract provided.
Law's Territory (A History Of Jurisdiction), Richard T. Ford
Law's Territory (A History Of Jurisdiction), Richard T. Ford
Michigan Law Review
Pop quiz: New York City. The United Kingdom. The East Bay Area Municipal Utilities District. Kwazulu, South Africa. The Cathedral of Notre Dame. The State of California. Vatican City. Switzerland. The American Embassy in the U.S.S.R. What do the foregoing items have in common? Answer: they are, or were, all territorial jurisdictions. A thesis of this Article is that territorial jurisdictions - the rigidly mapped territories within which formally defined legal powers are exercised by formally organized governmental institutions - are relatively new and intuitively surprising technological developments. New, because until the development of modern cartography, legal authority generally followed …
Jurisdictional Salvation And The Hague Treaty, Kevin M. Clermont
Jurisdictional Salvation And The Hague Treaty, Kevin M. Clermont
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
The United States' law of territorial jurisdiction in civil cases is a mess. Many commentators, here and abroad, have said so for a long time. The United States' treatment of foreign judgments, however, stands in contrast. As a well-behaved member of the international community of nations, the United States eagerly gives appropriate respect to foreign judgments, despite sometimes getting no respect in return.
Now, ongoing negotiations at the Hague have generated a prospect for an international agreement on the reciprocal treatment of foreign judgments. The envisaged treaty would ensure mutual respect of judgments among contracting countries, but it would also …
The Myth Of Choice Of Law: Rethinking Conflicts, Kermit Roosevelt Iii
The Myth Of Choice Of Law: Rethinking Conflicts, Kermit Roosevelt Iii
Michigan Law Review
Choice of law is a mess. That much has become a truism. It is a "dismal swamp," a morass of confusion, a body of doctrine "killed by a realism intended to save it," and now "universally said to be a disaster." One way to demonstrate its tribulations would be to look at the academic dissensus and the hopelessly underdeterminative Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws. Another would be to examine the Supreme Court's abdication of the task of articulating constitutional constraints on state choice-of-law rules. This article will do both. At the outset, though, I want to suggest that one …
Jurisdiction To Adjudicate: End Of The Century Or Beginning Of The Millennium?, Stephen B. Burbank
Jurisdiction To Adjudicate: End Of The Century Or Beginning Of The Millennium?, Stephen B. Burbank
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Icc's New Legal Landscape: The Need To Expand U.S. Domestic Jurisdiction To Prosecute Genocide, War Crimes And Crimes Against Humanity, Douglass Cassel
The Icc's New Legal Landscape: The Need To Expand U.S. Domestic Jurisdiction To Prosecute Genocide, War Crimes And Crimes Against Humanity, Douglass Cassel
Journal Articles
The United States was one of only seven nations to vote against the treaty. The ensuing debate within the United States has properly focused on whether the United States can and should ratify the treaty or, if not, whether as a non-party the United States should support or oppose the new court. Largely overlooked, however, are two separate but related questions: (1) should the existing, incomplete jurisdiction of U.S. courts over crimes within the ICC Statute be expanded to ensure that such crimes may also be prosecuted in U.S. courts, under universal jurisdiction or other bases allowed by international law?; …
Gazing Into The Crystal Ball: Reflections On The Standards State Judges Should Use To Ascertain Federal Law, Donald H. Zeigler
Gazing Into The Crystal Ball: Reflections On The Standards State Judges Should Use To Ascertain Federal Law, Donald H. Zeigler
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
U.S. Objections To The Statute Of The International Criminal Court: A Brief Response, Bartram Brown
U.S. Objections To The Statute Of The International Criminal Court: A Brief Response, Bartram Brown
Bartram Brown
No abstract provided.