Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- William & Mary Law School (7)
- Duke Law (4)
- University of Michigan Law School (4)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (4)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (3)
-
- University of Missouri School of Law (3)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (3)
- Cornell University Law School (2)
- Fordham Law School (2)
- Georgetown University Law Center (2)
- Mercer University School of Law (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- SelectedWorks (2)
- University of Colorado Law School (2)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (2)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Chapman University (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (1)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Mississippi College School of Law (1)
- North Carolina Central University School of Law (1)
- Pace University (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of Connecticut (1)
- University of Denver (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Massachusetts School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Judges (8)
- United States Supreme Court (4)
- Constitutional law (3)
- Courts (3)
- Judicial Selection (3)
-
- Judicial Selection Methods (3)
- Judicial independence (3)
- Judicial review (3)
- ABA Model Code of Judicial Conduct (2)
- Biography (2)
- Book review (2)
- Bush v. Gore (2)
- Criminal justice (2)
- Fairness (2)
- In memory (2)
- Independence (2)
- Judging (2)
- Judicial Candidates (2)
- Judicial opinions (2)
- Judicial process (2)
- Judiciary (2)
- Jurisprudence (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- Roger J Miner (2)
- United States Congress and Senate Committee on the Judiciary (2)
- A Critique of Adjudication: Fin de Siècle (1)
- Adjudication (1)
- Adjudications (1)
- Aggregation (1)
- American Bar Association (1)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (8)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (6)
- Faculty Publications (5)
- All Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Articles (2)
-
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Journal Articles (2)
- Mercer Law Review (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- Nevada Law Journal (2)
- Publications (2)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (2)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (2)
- Articles About GGU Law (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Articles and Papers (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- Horacio M. LYNCH (1)
- Hou Meng (1)
- Kentucky Law Journal (1)
- Law Faculty Articles and Research (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (1)
- Loyola University Chicago Law Journal (1)
- McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles (1)
- North Carolina Central Law Review (1)
- Scholarly Articles (1)
- Scholarly Works (1)
- Scrapbooks (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 61 - 66 of 66
Full-Text Articles in Law
Judge Henry Clay Caldwell, Richard S. Arnold, George C. Freeman Iii
Judge Henry Clay Caldwell, Richard S. Arnold, George C. Freeman Iii
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Designated Diffidence: District Court Judges On The Courts Of Appeals Papers Of General Interest, James J. Brudney, Corey Distlear
Designated Diffidence: District Court Judges On The Courts Of Appeals Papers Of General Interest, James J. Brudney, Corey Distlear
Faculty Scholarship
Since 1980, District CourtJudges, designated pursuant to federal statute, have helped decide over 75,000 court of appeals cases-nearly one of every five merits decisions. Although scholars and judges have warned that the presence of these visitors on appellate panels may undermine consistency, legitimacy, or collegiality, little empirical evidence exists related to such concerns. Working with an especially complete data set of labor law opinions, the authors found that district court visitors perform in a much more diffident fashion than their appellate colleagues. They contribute notably fewer majority opinions and dissents. In addition, their participations do not reflect their professional or …
Stalking Secret Law: What Predicts Publication In The United States Courts Of Appeals , Deborah J. Merritt, James J. Brudney
Stalking Secret Law: What Predicts Publication In The United States Courts Of Appeals , Deborah J. Merritt, James J. Brudney
Faculty Scholarship
Nearly four fifths of federal court of appeals opinions are unpublished. For more than 25 years, judges and scholars have debated the wisdom and fairness of this body of "secret" law. The debate over unpublished opinions recently intensified when the Eighth Circuit held that the Constitution requires courts to give these opinions precedential value. Despite continued controversy over unpublished opinions, limited empirical evidence exists on the nature of those opinions. Working with an especially complete dataset of labor law opinions and multivariate statistical methods, we were able to identify the factors that predict publication. Some of those factors, such as …
Publicly Financed Judicial Elections: An Overview, Charles G. Geyh
Publicly Financed Judicial Elections: An Overview, Charles G. Geyh
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
William Wirt & The Invention Of The Public Lawyer, H. Jefferson Powell
William Wirt & The Invention Of The Public Lawyer, H. Jefferson Powell
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Terry Firma: Background Democracy And Constitutional Foundations, Frank I. Michelman
Terry Firma: Background Democracy And Constitutional Foundations, Frank I. Michelman
Michigan Law Review
Ages ago, I had the excellent luck to fall into a collaboration with Terrance Sandalow to produce a casebook now long forgotten. There could have been no more bracing or beneficial learning experience for a fledgling legal scholar (meaning me). What brought us together indeed was luck from my standpoint, but it was enterprise, too - the brokerage of an alert West Publishing Company editor picking up on a casual remark of mine as he made one of his regular sweeps through Harvard Law School. A novice law professor, I mentioned to him how much I admired a new essay …