Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- UIC School of Law (17)
- University of Michigan Law School (10)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (5)
- Georgetown University Law Center (3)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (3)
-
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (3)
- Columbia Law School (2)
- Notre Dame Law School (2)
- Selected Works (2)
- SelectedWorks (2)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (2)
- University of Baltimore Law (2)
- University of Connecticut (2)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (2)
- University of Richmond (2)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Mississippi College School of Law (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- Old Dominion University (1)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (1)
- Southern Methodist University (1)
- University of Colorado Law School (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Judges (9)
- Judicial review (5)
- Federalism (3)
- Supreme court (3)
- United States Supreme Court (3)
-
- Articles (2)
- Biography (2)
- Congress (2)
- Constitution (2)
- Constitutional law (2)
- Courts (2)
- Decisionmaking (2)
- Hans-Georg Gadamer (2)
- Ideology (2)
- Information technology (2)
- Judicial discretion (2)
- Law (2)
- Opinions (2)
- Physician-assisted suicide (2)
- Voting patterns (2)
- A. Leon Higginbotham Jr. (1)
- Abortion (1)
- Academia (1)
- Access (1)
- Active judicial participation (1)
- Administrative Office of the United States Courts (1)
- Admissibility (1)
- Adult educators (1)
- Alden v. Maine (1)
- Allan Hutchinson (1)
- Publication
-
- UIC Law Review (17)
- All Faculty Scholarship (5)
- Faculty Scholarship (5)
- Michigan Law Review (5)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (3)
-
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (3)
- Articles (2)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (2)
- Faculty Articles and Papers (2)
- Faculty Works (2)
- Horacio M. LYNCH (2)
- Journal Articles (2)
- Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Legal Oral History Project (2)
- Touro Law Review (2)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (2)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (1)
- Book Chapters (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Dalhousie Law Journal (1)
- Dr Matilda Arvidsson (1)
- Florida State University Law Review (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Judith L. Maute (1)
- Lawyers and the Legal Profession (1)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (1)
- Notre Dame Lawyer (1)
- Osgoode Hall Law Journal (1)
- Other Publications (1)
- Publications (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 60 of 80
Full-Text Articles in Law
Playing On Words: Judge Richard A. Posner's Appellate Opinions, 1981-82--Ruminations On Sexy Judicial Opinion Style During An Extraordinary Rookie Season, Robert F. Blomquist
Playing On Words: Judge Richard A. Posner's Appellate Opinions, 1981-82--Ruminations On Sexy Judicial Opinion Style During An Extraordinary Rookie Season, Robert F. Blomquist
Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Politics Of Meaning: Law Dictionaries And The Liberal Tradition Of Interpretation, Gary L. Mcdowell
The Politics Of Meaning: Law Dictionaries And The Liberal Tradition Of Interpretation, Gary L. Mcdowell
Law Faculty Publications
At least since John Cowell's Interpreter was adjudged by the Committee on Grievances of the House of Commons in 1610 to be "very unadvised, and undiscreet, tending to the disreputation of the honour and power of the common laws" have law dictionaries been objects of occasional controversy. Yet legal dictionaries, as well as dictionaries more generally, have remained a constant resource in American law for those seeking to give meaning to the words of both statutes and constitutional provisions. They have appeared in the pages of the reports since the beginning of the republic; a majority of the justices of …
The Marshall Court And Property Rights: A Reappraisal, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1023 (2000), James W. Ely Jr.
The Marshall Court And Property Rights: A Reappraisal, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1023 (2000), James W. Ely Jr.
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Chief Justice John Marshall And The Course Of American Constitutional History, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 743 (2000), Samuel R. Olken
Chief Justice John Marshall And The Course Of American Constitutional History, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 743 (2000), Samuel R. Olken
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Institutions In Emerging Federal Systems: The Marshall Court And The European Court Of Justice, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1063 (2000), Herbert A. Johnson
Judicial Institutions In Emerging Federal Systems: The Marshall Court And The European Court Of Justice, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1063 (2000), Herbert A. Johnson
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
John Marshall In Spencer Roane's Virginia: The Southern Constitutional Opposition To The Marshall Court, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1131 (2000), F. Thornton Miller
John Marshall In Spencer Roane's Virginia: The Southern Constitutional Opposition To The Marshall Court, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1131 (2000), F. Thornton Miller
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
All Or Nothing: Explaining The Size Of Supreme Court Majorities, Paul H. Edelman, Suzanna Sherry
All Or Nothing: Explaining The Size Of Supreme Court Majorities, Paul H. Edelman, Suzanna Sherry
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
In this Article, Professors Edelman and Sherry use a probabilistic model to explore the process of coalition formation on the United States Supreme Court. They identify coalition formation as a Markov process with absorbing states and examine voting patterns from twelve Court Terms. On the basis of their data, they conclude that Justices are reluctant to remain in small minorities. Surprisingly, however, they also find that a three-Justice minority coalition is less likely to suffer defections than a four-Justice minority coalition. This counterintuitive result suggests that while in general it is minority Justices rather than majority Justices who drive the …
Thoughts On Some Potential Appellate And Trial Court Applications Of Therapeutic Jurisprudence, Steve Leben
Thoughts On Some Potential Appellate And Trial Court Applications Of Therapeutic Jurisprudence, Steve Leben
Faculty Works
To date, the application of therapeutic jurisprudence principles has been concentrated mainly on specialized trial courts: drug treatment courts, domestic violence courts, criminal courts, and juvenile and family courts. Its application to trial courts generally, as well as its application to the appellate courts, remains largely unexplored. This Article considers three areas in which trial and appellate courts may want to consider applying therapeutic jurisprudence.
My conclusions about the application of therapeutic jurisprudence to the appellate courts are admittedly tentative ones: my day job is sitting as a state general jurisdiction trial judge, not as an appellate court judge. Although …
Festschrift: Lee Loevinger, Layman E. Allen
Festschrift: Lee Loevinger, Layman E. Allen
Articles
Lee Loevinger is well-known and recognized for his outstanding achievements as a Minnesota Supreme Court Justice, as Assistant United States Attorney General for Antitrust, and as a superb practicing attorney. Perhaps less appreciated are his extraordinary contributions to the intersection of law and science generally and more particularly to the nurturing of the application of computer technology to law in its infancy.
Cardozo The [Small R] Realist, Richard D. Friedman
Cardozo The [Small R] Realist, Richard D. Friedman
Reviews
In Part I of this Review, I will discuss aspects of Cardozo's life and character. In Part II, I will discuss Cardozo's jurisprudential theory as revealed in his lectures and essays. In Part IlI, I will suggest how we gain a better perspective on his judicial opinions by understanding not only that theory but also the man and his life.
Supreme Court Federalism Decisions, Leon Friedman
Supreme Court Federalism Decisions, Leon Friedman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Kumho Tire Co. V. Carmichael: The Supreme Court Follows Up On The Daubert Test, Martin A. Schwartz
Kumho Tire Co. V. Carmichael: The Supreme Court Follows Up On The Daubert Test, Martin A. Schwartz
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Comments On Clinton: Reconsidering The Role Of Natural Law In John Marshall's Jurisprudence, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1141 (2000), James W. Ely
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Coercion, Pop-Psychology, And Judicial Moralizing: Some Proposals For Curbing Judicial Abuse Of Probation Conditions, Andrew Horwitz
Coercion, Pop-Psychology, And Judicial Moralizing: Some Proposals For Curbing Judicial Abuse Of Probation Conditions, Andrew Horwitz
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Property Rights In John Marshall's Virginia: The Case Of Crenshaw And Crenshaw V. Slate River Company, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1175 (2000), J. Gordon Hylton
Property Rights In John Marshall's Virginia: The Case Of Crenshaw And Crenshaw V. Slate River Company, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1175 (2000), J. Gordon Hylton
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Imagining Justice, Robin West
Imagining Justice, Robin West
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
As we approach the new century and the new millennium, those of us who are legal professionals in liberal capitalist democracies need to drastically improve our practices of law if we are to bring those practices in line with our professed ideals. The commodification and marketing of legal services, for example, combined with a nearly blind commitment to overly combative advocacy, puts legal assistance beyond the means of large segments of the public, severely undercutting our commitment to equality before the law. A different and perhaps harder question, however, is whether the ideals against which we judge our practices are …
Redressing The Imbalances: Rethinking The Judicial Role After R. V. R.D.S., Richard Devlin Frsc, Dianne Pothier
Redressing The Imbalances: Rethinking The Judicial Role After R. V. R.D.S., Richard Devlin Frsc, Dianne Pothier
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
The decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. R.D.S. dealt with whether a trial judge's comments, about the interactions between police officers and "non-white groups", gave rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias in the circumstances. They strongly criticize the contrary ruling of the dissent as inappropriately drawing a false dichotomy between decisions based on evidence and decisions based on evidence and decision based on generalizations, and as improperly ignoring social context with an unwarranted confidence in the ideology of colour blindness. While more supportive of the majority's analysis, the authors also find cause for concern, with …
Reducing The Democratic Deficit: Representation, Diversity, And The Canadian Judiciary, Or Towards A "Triple P" Judiciary, Richard Devlin Frsc, A. Wayne Mackay, Natasha Kim
Reducing The Democratic Deficit: Representation, Diversity, And The Canadian Judiciary, Or Towards A "Triple P" Judiciary, Richard Devlin Frsc, A. Wayne Mackay, Natasha Kim
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
The authors review the current structures for judicial appointments in Canada and provide statistical information about the results of these mechanisms in respect to diversity of representation on the courts. They are also critical of the fairness and openness of judicial appointments processes. After examining several variants of the dominant liberal view of law and of judges, the authors proffer and articulate a neo-realist theory of law and what they term a "bungee cord theory of judging." According to the former, law is inevitably a form of politics; according to the latter, judges are unavoidably political actors. In consequence, the …
Corrective Justice And The Revival Of Judicial Virtue, Mark C. Modak-Truran
Corrective Justice And The Revival Of Judicial Virtue, Mark C. Modak-Truran
Journal Articles
Judges must be wise. Sound judicial reasoning requires moral virtue. These sentiments about judging have been lost. They apparently belong to a bygone era. While many advocate self-restraint or prudence as judicial virtues, moral virtue has been conspicuously absent from the list. Except for avoiding obvious vices such as bribery, favoritism, prejudice, sloth, and arbitrariness, conventional wisdom maintains that being a good judge does not require being a good person. Even theorists sympathetic to a relationship between law and morality balk at making moral virtue a prerequisite of judicial decision making. Rather, many contend that judicial decision making is a …
Recovering The World Of The Marshall Court, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 781 (2000), G. Edward White
Recovering The World Of The Marshall Court, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 781 (2000), G. Edward White
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
John Marshall, Mcculloch V. Maryland, And The Southern States' Rights Tradition, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 875 (2000), R. Kent Newmyer
John Marshall, Mcculloch V. Maryland, And The Southern States' Rights Tradition, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 875 (2000), R. Kent Newmyer
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Classical Legal Naturalism And The Politics Of John Marshall's Constitutional Jurisprudence, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 935 (2000), Robert Lowry Clinton
Classical Legal Naturalism And The Politics Of John Marshall's Constitutional Jurisprudence, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 935 (2000), Robert Lowry Clinton
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Marshall Misconstrued: Activist? Partisan? Reactionary?, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1109 (2000), Jean Edward Smith
Marshall Misconstrued: Activist? Partisan? Reactionary?, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1109 (2000), Jean Edward Smith
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Chief Justice Marshall As Modern, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1145 (2000), Walter J. Kendall Iii
Chief Justice Marshall As Modern, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1145 (2000), Walter J. Kendall Iii
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Marbury, Mcculloch, Gore And Bush: A Comment On Sylvia Snowiss, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1157 (2000), Stephen B. Presser
Marbury, Mcculloch, Gore And Bush: A Comment On Sylvia Snowiss, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1157 (2000), Stephen B. Presser
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rebalancing Professor Ely's Reappraisal Of The Marshall Court And Property Rights, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1165 (2000), Stephen A. Siegel
Rebalancing Professor Ely's Reappraisal Of The Marshall Court And Property Rights, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1165 (2000), Stephen A. Siegel
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
John Marshall And Indian Nations In The Beginning And Now, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1183 (2000), Milner S. Ball
John Marshall And Indian Nations In The Beginning And Now, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1183 (2000), Milner S. Ball
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Deciphering Courts Of Appeals Decisions Using The U.S. Courts Of Appeals Data Base, Tracey E. George, Reginald S. Sheehan
Deciphering Courts Of Appeals Decisions Using The U.S. Courts Of Appeals Data Base, Tracey E. George, Reginald S. Sheehan
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
Is one circuit significantly more conservative or liberal than the others? Do circuit courts consistently avoid deciding the substance of certain appeals by concluding that the plaintiffs lack standing? Have state governments been more successful than other parties when they appeal adverse district court rulings? Do appeals courts act in a majoritarian or countermajoritarian manner with regard to elected institutions and the general public? The United States Courts of Appeals Data Base, an extensive data set of courts of appeals decisions, can address these and other questions about the circuit courts. This article describes the background, scope, and content of …
The Chicago Conspiracy Trial: Character And Judicial Discretion, Pnina Lahav
The Chicago Conspiracy Trial: Character And Judicial Discretion, Pnina Lahav
Faculty Scholarship
On October 29, 1969, sometime after two o'clock in the afternoon, following yet another heated exchange with defendant Bobby Seale in a courtroom full of spectators, reporters, and armed guards, Judge Julius Jennings Hoffman turned to a marshal and ordered: "Take that defendant into the room in there and deal with him as he should be dealt with in this circumstance."' Judge Hoffman described the aftermath:
In an attempt to maintain order in the courtroom, the Court thereupon ordered the defendant Seale removed from the courtroom at which time he was forcibly restrained by binding and gagging. The defendant Seale …
The Marshall Court And The European Court Of Justice, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1197 (2000), Charles F. Hobson
The Marshall Court And The European Court Of Justice, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1197 (2000), Charles F. Hobson
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.