Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Reconsidering The D.C. Circuit’S Proximate Cause Standard For Extraterrotorial Jurisdiction: Precluding The “Globalization” Theory To Promote Global Enforcement, Michelle A. Wyant
Reconsidering The D.C. Circuit’S Proximate Cause Standard For Extraterrotorial Jurisdiction: Precluding The “Globalization” Theory To Promote Global Enforcement, Michelle A. Wyant
Richmond Journal of Global Law & Business
As businesses expanded with the rise of globalization, so did the effects of anticompetitive activity and, in turn, the reach of the U.S. antitrust laws. Though Congress addressed the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the U.S. antitrust laws with its implementation of the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvement Act (“FTAIA”), the statute only created a three-way circuit split that led the Supreme Court to address the issue and determine that the foreign injury must arise from both foreign anticompetitive activity and the activity’s adverse effects on domestic commerce. The D.C. Circuit further clarified the issue on remand by requiring a proximate cause relationship …
New E.C. Merger Control Test Under Article 2 Of The Merger Control Regulation, The Symposium On European Competition Law , Alexander Riesenkampff
New E.C. Merger Control Test Under Article 2 Of The Merger Control Regulation, The Symposium On European Competition Law , Alexander Riesenkampff
Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business
On November 25, 2003, the Council reached a political accord on amending the Merger Control Regulation. On January 20, 2003, the Council formally adopted the amendment as new Regulation No.139/2004. Article 2, Sec. 3 of the new regulation provides: "A concentration which would significantly impede effective competition, in the common market or in a substantial part of it, in particular as a result of the creation or strengthening of a dominant position, shall be declared incompatible with the common market." This article begins by outlining the legislative history of the new Article 2. That preface is followed by the identification …
E.U. Competition And Private Actions For Damages, The Symposium On European Competition Law , Georg Berrisch, Eve Jordan, Rocio Salvador Roldan
E.U. Competition And Private Actions For Damages, The Symposium On European Competition Law , Georg Berrisch, Eve Jordan, Rocio Salvador Roldan
Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business
There are numerous reasons why private enforcement of E.U. competition law remains underdeveloped in Europe. The main reason is perhaps that it is not regulated by E.U. law but by Member State law. This in itself creates legal uncertainty. A system that creates optimal conditions for individuals to challenge infringements of competition rules before national courts ensures a high level of compliance. It is therefore no surprise that the European Commission ("Commission") is keen to see the general use of private enforcement, and in particular of actions for damages, in Europe increase. This paper focuses on one particular aspect of …
Pfizer, Inc. V. Government Of India: The Ability Of Foreign Governments To Sue Under Section 4 Of The Clayton Act, Jannet L. Gurian
Pfizer, Inc. V. Government Of India: The Ability Of Foreign Governments To Sue Under Section 4 Of The Clayton Act, Jannet L. Gurian
Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce
This Note will show that the Court's opinion should be liberally construed, thereby granting foreign governments the right to sue under section 4 of the Clayton Act whenever they are injured by American anticompetitive practices.