Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- International Law (3)
- AJIL (2)
- American Journal of International Law (2)
- Debt relief (2)
- International and municipal law (2)
-
- International law (2)
- Jus ad bellum (2)
- Refugees (2)
- The Middle East (2)
- Treaties (2)
- AEPS (1)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Alien Tort Claims Act (United States) (1)
- Alternative dispute resolution (1)
- American Society of International Law Proceedings (1)
- Antarctic (1)
- Arab countries (1)
- Arbitration (1)
- Arbitration International (1)
- Arbitration friendliness (1)
- Arctic (1)
- Arctic council (1)
- Armed conflict (1)
- Asia (1)
- Bribery--Law and legislation (1)
- Caroline (1)
- Civilian war casualties (1)
- Climate Change (1)
- Climate change (1)
- Collective security (1)
Articles 31 - 32 of 32
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Use Of Force Against Non-State Actors: Introductory Remarks By Monica Hakimi, Monica Hakimi
The Use Of Force Against Non-State Actors: Introductory Remarks By Monica Hakimi, Monica Hakimi
Faculty Scholarship
This is the panel on the use of defensive force against non-state actors. We thought we would use the campaign against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, ISIS, to take stock on where we are on the question of when, if ever, states may use defensive force against non-state actors in other states.
Just to set the scene a little bit, I am sure many of you know that ISIS is a transnational terrorist group that emerged in Syria in 2013, in the middle of the civil war there. By the summer of 2014, ISIS occupied quite a bit …
What Does It Mean To Be ‘Pro-Arbitration’?, George A. Bermann
What Does It Mean To Be ‘Pro-Arbitration’?, George A. Bermann
Faculty Scholarship
International arbitration commentators commonly ask of a proposed policy or practice whether it is ‘pro-’ or ‘anti-arbitration’. Framing the question that way presupposes a shared understanding of what does or does not make a policy or practice arbitration-friendly. In truth, the ways in which policies or practices may affect international arbitration’s well-being are manifold. They may even distinctly serve international arbitration’s well-being in some respects while equally distinctly disserving it in others. It behooves those who take international; arbitration’s well-being seriously to acknowledge the multiplicity of metrics for identifying what is ‘pro-’ and what is ‘anti-arbitration’ and to seek the …