Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- The University of Akron (27)
- University of Georgia School of Law (15)
- Selected Works (5)
- Marquette University Law School (4)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (4)
-
- Fordham Law School (3)
- New York Law School (3)
- Boston University School of Law (2)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (2)
- Emory University School of Law (2)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (2)
- Pepperdine University (2)
- Southern Methodist University (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo (1)
- California Western School of Law (1)
- Roger Williams University (1)
- Santa Clara Law (1)
- Suffolk University (1)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (1)
- University of Colorado Law School (1)
- University of Maine School of Law (1)
- University of Massachusetts School of Law (1)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (1)
- University of New Hampshire (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (1)
- Publication
-
- Akron Intellectual Property Journal (27)
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law (15)
- Faculty Scholarship (8)
- Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review (4)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (3)
-
- Other Publications (3)
- Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property (2)
- Faculty Articles (2)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (2)
- Faculty Publications (2)
- Faculty Publications & Other Works (2)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (1)
- Catholic University Law Review (1)
- Christopher B. Seaman (1)
- Faculty Works (1)
- Historical and Topical Legal Documents (1)
- J. Jonas Anderson (1)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (1)
- Journalism (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (1)
- Robin C Feldman (1)
- Scholarly Articles (1)
- Srividhya Ragavan (1)
- Stephen Yelderman (1)
- Suffolk University Law School Faculty Works (1)
- The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law (1)
- University of Colorado Law Review (1)
- University of Richmond Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 61 - 88 of 88
Full-Text Articles in Law
Are The Secrecy Order Compensation Provisions Of The Patent Act Constitutional Under The Fifth Amendment?, Adam J. Citrin
Are The Secrecy Order Compensation Provisions Of The Patent Act Constitutional Under The Fifth Amendment?, Adam J. Citrin
Akron Intellectual Property Journal
The secrecy order provisions of the Patent Act' raise a number of issues under the U.S. Constitution. The primary focus of this note is on the Fifth Amendment issues raised by the Invention Secrecy Act.
Patent Litigation In Japan, David W. Hill, Shinichi Murata
Patent Litigation In Japan, David W. Hill, Shinichi Murata
Akron Intellectual Property Journal
This article will explore how patent litigation in Japan has changed and will also compare and contrast aspects of patent litigation in the U.S. and Japan.
In Part II, we show recent statistical data on Japanese patent infringement litigation. Parts III and IV briefly review the Japanese judicial system and legal professionals in the area of intellectual property. Part V addresses patent-infringement actions in Japan and the recent amendments of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Patent Law. Next, Parts VI and VII discuss infringement analysis and possible defenses in patent-infringement litigation. Part VIII reviews how to calculate the …
An Intentional Tort Theory Of Patents, Saurabh Vishnubhakat
An Intentional Tort Theory Of Patents, Saurabh Vishnubhakat
Faculty Scholarship
This Article challenges the dogma of U.S. patent law that direct infringement is a strict liability tort. Impermissibly practicing a patented invention does create liability even if the infringer did not intend to infringe or know about the patent. The consensus is that this is a form of strict liability. The flaw in the consensus is that it proves too little, for the same is true of intentional torts: intent to commit the tort is unnecessary, and ignorance of the legal right is no excuse. What is relevant is intent to perform the action that the law deems tortious. So …
The Youngest Patent Validity Proceeding: Evaluating Post-Grant Review, Saurabh Vishnubhakat
The Youngest Patent Validity Proceeding: Evaluating Post-Grant Review, Saurabh Vishnubhakat
Faculty Scholarship
Of the three major ex post patent validity challenge mechanisms that the 2011 Leahy-Smith America Invents Act put into place, the third is beginning to show signs of use. Post-grant review is an administrative proceeding of remarkable breadth as compared both to inter partes review and to the transition program for covered business method patents. Thus far, however, patent challengers have made very limited use of post-grant reviews: in the nearly three years since the procedure became available, the United States Patent and Trademark Office has received only about two dozen petitions for post-grant review. By contrast, the number of …
A Pharmaceutical Park Place: Why The Supreme Court Should Modify The Scope Of The Patent Test For Reverse Payment Deals, David Ernest Balajthy
A Pharmaceutical Park Place: Why The Supreme Court Should Modify The Scope Of The Patent Test For Reverse Payment Deals, David Ernest Balajthy
Journal of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
The Rise And Fall Of The Patent Trolls: How They Lost The Public Relations Battle, Liz Weber
The Rise And Fall Of The Patent Trolls: How They Lost The Public Relations Battle, Liz Weber
Journalism
Patent trolls gained notoriety in the early 2000s as many nine- and even 10-digit patent infringement settlements made headlines. Trolls claim they are helping inventors get the compensation they deserve for their inventions, while opponents claim trolls are parasites on successful businesses who want glittering pots of gold in exchange for doing absolutely nothing. As the debate continues and parties on both sides continue to call for patent reform, the question arises: what is best of the IP overall market? And how can patent trolls utilize communications best practices to ensure their message is convincingly conveyed to key influencers who …
The Supreme Court's Quiet Revolution In Induced Patent Infringement, Timothy R. Holbrook
The Supreme Court's Quiet Revolution In Induced Patent Infringement, Timothy R. Holbrook
Faculty Articles
The Supreme Court over the last decade or so has reengaged with patent law. While much attention has been paid to the Court’s reworking of what constitutes patent-eligible subject matter and enhancing tools to combat “patent trolls,” what many have missed is the Court’s reworking of the contours of active inducement of patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b). The Court has taken the same number of § 271(b) cases as subject matter eligibility cases—four. Yet this reworking has not garnered much attention in the literature. This Article offers the first comprehensive assessment of the Court’s efforts to define active …
A Jukebox For Patents: Can Patent Licensing Of Incremental Inventions Be Controlled By Compulsory Licensing?, Ralph D. Clifford
A Jukebox For Patents: Can Patent Licensing Of Incremental Inventions Be Controlled By Compulsory Licensing?, Ralph D. Clifford
Faculty Publications
The patent system today no longer follows the classic understanding of how it is designed to work. In theory, to avoid infringement, a product developer searches the database of issued patents looking for those that might read onto the product being developed. If such patents are found, the developer can approach the patent holder for a license, can attempt to design around the claims, or can abandon the project. With many hundreds of thousands of patents being issued annually—a rate of issuance almost an order of magnitude larger than a hundred years ago—it is now a practical impossibility to search …
Top Tens In 2015: Patent, Trademark, Copyright And Trade Secret Cases, Stephen M. Mcjohn
Top Tens In 2015: Patent, Trademark, Copyright And Trade Secret Cases, Stephen M. Mcjohn
Suffolk University Law School Faculty Works
The Supreme Court significantly affected the dynamics of patent litigation, holding that patent claim interpretation was not always reviewed de novo and that good faith belief that a patent was invalid was not a defense to infringement. The Federal Circuit potentially changed the approach to patent claim interpretation, holding that claims could be interpreted in light of the written description of the invention, even where the claim was not ambiguous. The Federal Circuit also addressed inducement of patent infringement, holding that it was not inducement to suggest consulting a physician who would likely prescribe an infringing treatment. The Federal Circuit …
Ip Litigation In United States District Courts: 1994 To 2014, Matthew Sag
Ip Litigation In United States District Courts: 1994 To 2014, Matthew Sag
Faculty Publications & Other Works
This Article undertakes a broad-based empirical review of intellectual property (“IP”) litigation in U.S. federal district courts from 1994 to 2014. Unlike the prior literature, this study analyzes federal copyright, patent, and trademark litigation trends as a unified whole. It undertakes a systematic analysis of the records of more than 190,000 cases filed in federal courts and examines the subject matter, geographical, and temporal variation within federal IP litigation over the last two decades.
This Article analyzes changes in the distribution of IP litigation over time and their regional distribution. The key findings of this Article stem from an attempt …
A Collision Course Between Trips Flexibilities And Investor-State Proceedings, Cynthia M. Ho
A Collision Course Between Trips Flexibilities And Investor-State Proceedings, Cynthia M. Ho
Faculty Publications & Other Works
This Article discusses an important, yet understudied threat to patent, as well as other intellectual property sovereignty under TRIPS: pending and potential challenges by companies under international agreements protecting investments. Although such agreements have existed for decades, Philip Morris and Eli Lilly are blazing a new path for companies to sue countries they claim interfere with their intellectual property rights through so-called investor-state arbitrations. These suits seek hundreds of millions in compensation and even injunctive relief for alleged violations of internationally agreed intellectual property norms. The suits fundamentally challenge TRIPS flexibilities at the very time the Declaration on Patent Protection …
In Pursuit Of Patent Quality (And Reflection Of Reification), Kenneth L. Port, Lucas M. Hjelle, Molly Littman
In Pursuit Of Patent Quality (And Reflection Of Reification), Kenneth L. Port, Lucas M. Hjelle, Molly Littman
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
None
Myriad: A Look Into The Future Of Genetic Patentable Subject Matter, Nathan Edward Cromer
Myriad: A Look Into The Future Of Genetic Patentable Subject Matter, Nathan Edward Cromer
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
None
The Case For Incentivizing Healthy Food By Using Patents, Enrico Bonadio
The Case For Incentivizing Healthy Food By Using Patents, Enrico Bonadio
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
None
A Fake Right Of Priority Under The Cross-Strait Agreement On Intellectual Property Right Protection And Cooperation, Ping-Hsun Chen
A Fake Right Of Priority Under The Cross-Strait Agreement On Intellectual Property Right Protection And Cooperation, Ping-Hsun Chen
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
None
Unh School Of Law Ip Library: 20th Anniversary Reflection On The Only Academic Ip Library In The United States, Jon R. Cavicchi
Unh School Of Law Ip Library: 20th Anniversary Reflection On The Only Academic Ip Library In The United States, Jon R. Cavicchi
Law Faculty Scholarship
[Excerpt] The UNH School of Law Intellectual Property Library celebrates its twentieth anniversary this year. It is a fortuitous time for this look back and for strategic considerations for the future. This anniversary comes at a time in the history of legal education when conditions over the past few years have intensified the analysis of mission and resources for law school libraries. This article is a retrospective review of the history and dynamics surrounding the founding and first twenty years of growth. It is also an analysis of the future growth and mission of the IP Library during times that …
Intellectual Property Law Hybridization, Clark D. Asay
Intellectual Property Law Hybridization, Clark D. Asay
Faculty Scholarship
Traditionally, patent and copyright laws have been viewed as separate bodies of law with distinct utilitarian goals. The conventional wisdom holds that patent law aims to incentivize the production of inventive ideas, while copyright focuses on protecting the original expression of ideas, but not the underlying ideas themselves. This customary divide between patent and copyright laws finds some support in the Constitution’s Intellectual Property Clause, and Congress, courts, and scholars have largely perpetuated it in enacting, interpreting, and analyzing copyright and patent laws over time.
In this Article, I argue that it is time to partially breach this traditional divide. …
The Mayo Framework Is Bad For Your Health, Christopher M. Holman
The Mayo Framework Is Bad For Your Health, Christopher M. Holman
Faculty Works
This Article begins by providing a brief historical retrospective of the development of the patent eligibility doctrine, and then delves into the related questions of: (1) what are the Supreme Court’s policy objectives for the recent reinvigoration of the patent eligibility doctrine; and (2) has it achieved those objectives? The article then discusses three important out-standing questions regarding the application of the new test for patent eligibility: (1) what constitutes a natural phenomenon; (2) what constitutes an inventive step; and (3) what, if any, role does preemption play in the analysis? The article then provides four examples of recent lower …
Ip Litigation In U.S. District Courts: 1994-2014, Matthew Sag
Ip Litigation In U.S. District Courts: 1994-2014, Matthew Sag
Faculty Articles
This Article undertakes a broad-based empirical review of intellectual property ("IP") litigation in U.S. federal district courts from 1994 to 2014. Unlike the prior literature, this study analyzes federal copyright, patent, and trademark litigation trends as a unified whole. It undertakes a systematic analysis of the records of more than 190,000 cases filed in federal courts and examines the subject matter, geographical, and temporal variation within federal IP litigation over the last two decades.
This Article analyzes changes in the distribution of IP litigation over time and their regional distribution. The key findings of this Article stem from an attempt …
Who Owns Gene Editing? Patents In The Time Of Crispr, Jacob S. Sherkow
Who Owns Gene Editing? Patents In The Time Of Crispr, Jacob S. Sherkow
Other Publications
New gene-editing technologies, like CRISPR, promise revolutionary advances in biology and medicine. However, several patent disputes in the USA and UK may have complicated who can use CRISPR. What does this mean for the future of gene editing?
Pursuit Of Profit Poisons Collaboration, Jacob S. Sherkow
Pursuit Of Profit Poisons Collaboration, Jacob S. Sherkow
Other Publications
The CRISPR–Cas9 patent battle demonstrates how overzealous efforts to commercialize technology can damage science.
Pursuit Of Profit Poisons Collaboration, Jacob S. Sherkow
Pursuit Of Profit Poisons Collaboration, Jacob S. Sherkow
Other Publications
The CRISPR–Cas9 patent battle demonstrates how overzealous efforts to commercialize technology can damage science.
The Irrelevance Of Nanotechnology Patents, Emily M. Morris
The Irrelevance Of Nanotechnology Patents, Emily M. Morris
Faculty Publications
Although scientists have for decades now had the ability to manipulate matter at the atomic level, we have yet to see the nanotechnological revolution that these scientists predicted would follow. Despite the years of effort and billions of dollars that have been invested into research and development thus far, nanotechnology has yielded surprisingly few end-user applications. A number of commentators have blamed this lack of progress on the Bayh-Dole Act and other changes to patent law, arguing that, although these laws are supposed to stimulate technological development, they have in fact had the exact opposite effect when it comes to …
Intellectual Property Law Hybridization, Clark D. Asay
Intellectual Property Law Hybridization, Clark D. Asay
University of Colorado Law Review
Traditionally, patent and copyright laws have been viewed as separate bodies of law with distinct utilitarian goals. Conventional wisdom holds that patent law aims to incentivize the production of inventive ideas, while copyright focuses on protecting the original expression of ideas, but not the underlying ideas themselves. This customary divide between copyright and patent laws finds some support in the distinction between "authors" and "inventors," as well as that between "writings" and "discoveries," in the U.S. Constitution's Intellectual Property Clause. And Congress, courts, and scholars have largely perpetuated the divide in separately enacting, interpreting, and analyzing copyright and patent laws …
Patent "Trolls" And Claim Construction, Greg Reilly
Patent "Trolls" And Claim Construction, Greg Reilly
Faculty Scholarship
This Essay explores the largely overlooked relationship between claim construction and patent assertion entities (patent “trolls”), finding that claim construction problems and trends benefit patent assertion entities. First, the Federal Circuit is deeply divided as to the proper approach to claim construction. This split is a significant contributor to uncertain patent scope, which is widely-recognized as a core reason for the rise and success of patent assertion entities. Second, case law and commentary increasingly endorse an approach to claim construction that relies on the “general meaning” in the technical field with limited reliance on the patent itself. This approach increases …
Only A Pawn In The Game: Rethinking Induced Patent Infringement, W. Keith Robinson
Only A Pawn In The Game: Rethinking Induced Patent Infringement, W. Keith Robinson
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
A party that causes another to infringe a patent may be liable for induced infringement. Recently, the Supreme Court and the Federal Circuit have interpreted the inducement statute in a way that may be problematic. For example, in a suit for induced patent infringement a plaintiff must show that an accused party had specific intent to cause infringement. The defendant can rebut allegations of induced infringement by showing that he had a good faith belief that he did not infringe the patent. However, a defendant’s good faith belief that the patent is invalid is no longer a defense to inducement. …
Awarding Attorney Fees And Deterring 'Patent Trolls', W. Keith Robinson
Awarding Attorney Fees And Deterring 'Patent Trolls', W. Keith Robinson
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
A court may award attorney fees to a prevailing party in a patent trial under exceptional circumstances. Since 2005, courts had applied a rigid formula to determine whether a case was exceptional. In the summer of 2014, the Supreme Court rejected this rigid test. Instead, the Court held that an exceptional case is “simply one that stands out from others.” Finding a case exceptional, the Court said, was at the discretion of the district court and only reviewable on appeal for an abuse of discretion.
A little over a year later, one interesting question is: how do district courts now …
Empirical Evidence Of Drug Pricing Games - A Citizen's Pathway Gone Astray, Robin C. Feldman, Evan Frondorf, Andrew Cordova