Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Selected Works (105)
- The University of Akron (40)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (30)
- St. Mary's University (28)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (22)
-
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (22)
- SelectedWorks (19)
- Boston University School of Law (18)
- Georgetown University Law Center (17)
- Himmelfarb Health Sciences Library, The George Washington University (15)
- University of Miami Law School (15)
- Cleveland State University (13)
- Duke Law (11)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (10)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (10)
- University of Michigan Law School (10)
- American University Washington College of Law (9)
- DePaul University (9)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (9)
- SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah (9)
- Hamline University (8)
- University of Georgia School of Law (8)
- University of Kentucky (8)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (8)
- William & Mary Law School (8)
- University of San Diego (7)
- Barry University School of Law (6)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (6)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (6)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (6)
- Keyword
-
- Health care (32)
- Affordable Care Act (28)
- ACA (23)
- Health Law and Policy (20)
- Health insurance (17)
-
- Health (16)
- Health law (16)
- Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (15)
- Abortion (13)
- Healthcare (13)
- King v. Burwell (13)
- Medical malpractice (12)
- Medicare (12)
- Health care reform (11)
- Medicaid (11)
- Federalism (10)
- Law (10)
- Obamacare (10)
- Ebola (9)
- FDA (9)
- Mental health (9)
- Public health (9)
- Global health (8)
- Health Care (8)
- Regulation (8)
- Supreme Court (8)
- Bioethics (7)
- Disability (7)
- Insurance (7)
- PPACA (7)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (47)
- Akron Law Review (40)
- Health Matrix: The Journal of Law-Medicine (29)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (27)
- Articles (17)
-
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (17)
- Saint Louis University Journal of Health Law & Policy (17)
- All Faculty Scholarship (12)
- Journal of Law and Health (11)
- Annals of Health Law and Life Sciences (10)
- University of Miami Business Law Review (10)
- DePaul Journal of Health Care Law (9)
- National Health Policy Forum (9)
- Hamline Law Review (8)
- Journal of Health Care Law and Policy (8)
- Marc D. Ginsberg (8)
- Mark E. Wojcik (8)
- Timothy S. Jost (7)
- Health Law Outlook (6)
- Journal of Contemporary Health Law & Policy (1985-2015) (6)
- Susan A. Channick (6)
- Utah Law Review (6)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (5)
- Faculty Publications (5)
- Faculty Publications By Year (5)
- O. Carter Snead (5)
- Scholarly Works (5)
- William Mitchell Law Review (5)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (4)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (4)
Articles 631 - 632 of 632
Full-Text Articles in Law
Mandatory Process, Matthew Lawrence
Mandatory Process, Matthew Lawrence
Matthew B. Lawrence
This Article suggests that people tend to undervalue their procedural rights — their proverbial “day in court” — until they are actually involved in a dispute. The Article argues that the inherent, outcome-independent value of participating in a dispute resolution process comes largely from its power to soothe a person’s grievance — their perception of unfairness and accompanying negative emotional reaction — win or lose. But a tendency to assume unchanging emotional states, known in behavioral economics as projection bias, can prevent people from anticipating that they might become aggrieved and from appreciating the grievance-soothing power of process. When this …
Procedural Triage, Matthew Lawrence
Procedural Triage, Matthew Lawrence
Matthew B. Lawrence
Prior scholarship has assumed that the inherent value of a “day in court” is the same for all claimants, so that when procedural resources (like a jury trial or a hearing) are scarce, they should be rationed the same way for all claimants. That is incorrect. This Article shows that the inherent value of a “day in court” can be far greater for some claimants, such as first-time filers, than for others, such as corporate entities and that it can be both desirable and feasible to take this variation into account in doling out scarce procedural protections. In other words, …