Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- ACA (7)
- Affordable Care Act (7)
- Obamacare (7)
- Federalism (5)
- Health law (5)
-
- Commerce Clause (4)
- Health insurance (4)
- PPACA (4)
- Supreme Court (4)
- Constitutional law (3)
- Drugs (3)
- Health care (3)
- Necessary and Proper Clause (3)
- Abortion law (2)
- Bioethics (2)
- Commerce clause (2)
- Cost of medical care (2)
- Death (2)
- Drug (2)
- ELSI (2)
- From (2)
- Health care reform (2)
- Individual mandate (2)
- Insurance (2)
- Medicaid (2)
- Medical care (2)
- Minimum coverage provision (2)
- Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (2)
- 503a (1)
- ACA litigation (1)
Articles 31 - 46 of 46
Full-Text Articles in Law
With Child, Without Rights?: Restoring A Pregnant Woman's Right To Refuse Medical Treatment Through The Hiv Lens, Michael Ulrich
With Child, Without Rights?: Restoring A Pregnant Woman's Right To Refuse Medical Treatment Through The Hiv Lens, Michael Ulrich
Faculty Scholarship
In Doe v. Division of Youth & Family Services , a hospital employee sought state intervention when an HIV-positive woman refused to comply with treatment recommendations during her pregnancy to drastically reduce the chances of mother-to-child-transmission (MTCT), eventually triggering a lawsuit against the hospital. With an increase in the number of HIV-positive women becoming pregnant and the court avoiding constitutional analysis of the woman’s right to refuse medical treatment, there is a clear void where legal analysis is surely needed. This Article fills this void for the inevitable case where an HIV-positive pregnant woman’s right to refuse medical treatment is …
Bad News For John Marshall, Gary S. Lawson, David Kopel
Bad News For John Marshall, Gary S. Lawson, David Kopel
Faculty Scholarship
In "Bad News for Professor Koppelman: The Incidental Unconstitutionality of the Individual Mandate," we demonstrated that the individual mandate’s forced participation in commercial transactions cannot be justified under the Necessary and Proper Clause as the Clause was interpreted in McCulloch v. Maryland. Professor Andrew Koppelman’s response, "Bad News for Everybody," wrongly conflates that argument with a wide range of interpretative and substantive positions that are not logically entailed by taking seriously the requirement that laws enacted under the Necessary and Proper Clause must be incidental to an enumerated power. His response is thus largely unresponsive to our actual arguments.
Brief Of Amici Curiae Health Law & Policy Scholars And Prescriptions Policy Choices In Support Of Respondents On The Constitutional Validity Of The Medicaid Expansion In State Of Florida V. Department Of Health And Human Services, Kevin Outterson, Nicole Huberfeld
Brief Of Amici Curiae Health Law & Policy Scholars And Prescriptions Policy Choices In Support Of Respondents On The Constitutional Validity Of The Medicaid Expansion In State Of Florida V. Department Of Health And Human Services, Kevin Outterson, Nicole Huberfeld
Faculty Scholarship
The Medicaid expansion in Section 2001(a)(1)(C) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is one part of Congress’s comprehensive effort to expand access to health care coverage. This expansion is not revolutionary, but builds on many prior statutory amendments to Medicaid. Nor does it alter the voluntary nature of the Medicaid program – as before, States remain free to decline federal funding. The Petitioners and their amici have mischaracterized the expansion to obscure these facts, hoping this Court will unravel this hard-fought legislative enactment.
The question presented is whether Congress may offer States generous additional funding for Medicaid, with …
Deductions For Drug Ads? The Constitution Does Not Require Congress To Subsidize Direct-To-Consumer Prescription Drug Advertisements, Kevin Outterson, Shoshana Speiser
Deductions For Drug Ads? The Constitution Does Not Require Congress To Subsidize Direct-To-Consumer Prescription Drug Advertisements, Kevin Outterson, Shoshana Speiser
Faculty Scholarship
The First Amendment protects lawful, non-misleading advertising as commercial speech, which constrains Congressional attempts to regulate direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) of prescription drugs. But the Constitution does not require the federal government to subsidize advertising through the Tax Code. Congress could revoke the legislative gift of tax deductions for DTCA without running afoul of regulating speech. While DTCA proponents maintain that DTCA increases disease awareness and leads to more doctor-patient conversations, Congress could find that these purported benefits are outweighed by other negative consequences, including excessive prescribing.
Standards For Health Care Decision-Making: Legal And Practical Considerations, A. Kimberley Dayton
Standards For Health Care Decision-Making: Legal And Practical Considerations, A. Kimberley Dayton
Faculty Scholarship
This Article explores the guardian’s role in making, or assisting the ward to make, health care decisions, and provides an overview of existing standards and tools that offer guidance in this area. Part II outlines briefly the legal decisions and statutory developments assuring patient autonomy in medical treatment, and shows how these legal texts apply to and structure the guardian’s role as health care decision-maker. Part III examines the range of legal and practical approaches to such matters as decision-making standards, determining the ward’s likely treatment preferences, and resolving conflicts between guardians and health care agents appointed by the ward. …
The Assault On Bad Food: Tobacco-Style Litigation As An Element Of The Comprehensive Scheme To Fight Obesity, Jada Fehn
Faculty Scholarship
This article provides a summary of the obesity epidemic - the economic costs and importantly, some causes. The need for a comprehensive scheme will be explained by examining the shortfalls of current regulatory mechanisms. Next, this article will explain the three waves of tobacco litigation, the strategy involved in each, and why the third wave left an impact. Then, the current status of food litigation will be explained. Next, applying the tobacco model to big food, this article will make it clear that discovery is crucial in several respects. Lastly, an explicit call to action and a battle plan will …
Valuing Health Care: Improving Productivity And Quality, Barak D. Richman, Arti K. Rai
Valuing Health Care: Improving Productivity And Quality, Barak D. Richman, Arti K. Rai
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
A Randomized Study Of How Physicians Interpret Research Funding Disclosures, Christopher Robertson
A Randomized Study Of How Physicians Interpret Research Funding Disclosures, Christopher Robertson
Faculty Scholarship
The effects of clinical-trial funding on the interpretation of trial results are poorly understood. We examined how such support affects physicians’ reactions to trials with a high, medium, or low level of methodologic rigor.
Effect Of Financial Relationships On The Behaviors Of Health Care Professionals: A Review Of The Evidence, Christopher Robertson, Susannah Rose, Aaron Kesselheim
Effect Of Financial Relationships On The Behaviors Of Health Care Professionals: A Review Of The Evidence, Christopher Robertson, Susannah Rose, Aaron Kesselheim
Faculty Scholarship
This symposium paper explores the empirical evidence regarding the impact of financial relationships on the behavior of health care providers, specifically, physicians. We identify and synthesize peer-reviewed data addressing whether financial incentives are causally related to patient outcomes and health care costs. We cover three main areas where financial conflicts of interest arise and may have an observable relationship to health care practices: physicians’ roles as self-referrers, insurance reimbursement schemes that create incentives for certain clinical choices over others, and financial relationships between physicians and the drug and device industries. We found a well-developed scientific literature consisting of dozens of …
Cost-Benefit Federalism: Reconciling Collective Action Federalism And Libertarian Federalism In The Obamacare Litigation And Beyond, Abigail Moncrieff
Cost-Benefit Federalism: Reconciling Collective Action Federalism And Libertarian Federalism In The Obamacare Litigation And Beyond, Abigail Moncrieff
Faculty Scholarship
The lawsuits challenging Obamacare's individual mandate have exposed a rift in federalism theory. On one side of the divide is a view that the national government ought to intervene - and ought to be constitutionally permitted to intervene - whenever the states are "separately incompetent" to regulate. This is the view that Robert Cooter and Neil Siegel recently theorized as "collective action federalism." On the other side of the divide is a view that federalism exists for reasons other than efficiency of regulation and particularly that the Founders created the federal structure for the protection of individual liberty. According to …
Accountable Care Organizations In The Affordable Care Act, Frank Pasquale
Accountable Care Organizations In The Affordable Care Act, Frank Pasquale
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Not This Child: Constitutional Questions In Regulating Non-Invasive Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis And Selective Abortion, Jaime S. King
Not This Child: Constitutional Questions In Regulating Non-Invasive Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis And Selective Abortion, Jaime S. King
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Creating A Clearinghouse To Evaluate Environmental Risks To Fetal Development, Kate Bloch
Creating A Clearinghouse To Evaluate Environmental Risks To Fetal Development, Kate Bloch
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Developmental Neuroscience, Children's Relationships With Primary Caregivers, And Child Protection Policy Reform, Lois A. Weithorn
Developmental Neuroscience, Children's Relationships With Primary Caregivers, And Child Protection Policy Reform, Lois A. Weithorn
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Death In Our Life, Joseph Raz
Death In Our Life, Joseph Raz
Faculty Scholarship
This is the text of the Annual Lecture of the Society for Applied Philosophy, delivered in Oxford on 22-5-12. I kept the talk style of the paper. It examines a central aspect of the relations between duration and quality of life by considering the moral right to voluntary euthanasia, and some aspects of the moral case for a legal right to euthanasia. Would widespread acceptance of a right to voluntary euthanasia lead to widespread changes in attitude to life and death? Many of its advocates deny that seeing it as a narrow right enabling people to avoid ending their life …
What The New Deal Settled, Jamal Greene
What The New Deal Settled, Jamal Greene
Faculty Scholarship
Not since George H.W. Bush banned it from the menu of Air Force One did broccoli receive as much attention as during the legal and political debate over the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ("ACA"). Opponents of the ACA have forcefully and repeatedly argued that if Congress has the power to require Americans to purchase health insurance as a means of reducing health care costs, then it likewise has the power to require Americans to eat broccoli. Broccoli is mentioned twelve times across the four Supreme Court opinions issued in the ACA decision – that's eleven more appearances than …