Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Fourteenth Amendment (2)
- Incorporation (2)
- Bill of Rights (1)
- Bipartisan Safer Communities Act (1)
- Civilian firearm ownership (1)
-
- Coconspirator (1)
- Coconspirator exception (1)
- Confrontation Clause (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Coventurer (1)
- Crawford (1)
- El-Mezain (1)
- Elashi (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Firearms (1)
- Hamas (1)
- Hearsay (1)
- Holy Land Foundation (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Nontestimonial (1)
- Originalism (1)
- Red flag law (1)
- Second Amendment (1)
- Sixth Amendment (1)
- Terrorism (1)
- Testimonial (1)
- Treason (1)
- Treason Clause (1)
- Zakat (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Red-Flag Laws, Civilian Firearms Ownership And Measures Of Freedom, Royce De R. Barondes
Red-Flag Laws, Civilian Firearms Ownership And Measures Of Freedom, Royce De R. Barondes
Faculty Publications
This essay provides context for an assessment of a part of the recently-enacted Bipartisan Safer Communities Act--federal legislation funding state red-flag procedures, which allow for seizures of firearms from persons who have not committed crimes.
First, it assesses Maryland’s experience during the first year of implementing these procedures. The essay details computations, extrapolating from Maryland’s first-year experience, showing that adoption of these statutes causes blameless persons to be subject to being killed by the government at a rate comparable to or in excess of the murder rate.
Second, the essay identifies an overlooked impact of this federal legislation. The legislation’s …
Dual Allegiance: Federal And State Treason Prosecutions, The Treason Clause, And The Fourteenth Amendment, Alexander Gouzoules
Dual Allegiance: Federal And State Treason Prosecutions, The Treason Clause, And The Fourteenth Amendment, Alexander Gouzoules
Faculty Publications
The Treason Clause creates an individual right at a criminal trial that could have logically been placed within the Fifth Amendment rather than Article III: “No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.” It has effectively prevented expansive uses of the charge at the federal level. But states may also charge citizens with treason against state governments, and many such prosecutions have played important roles in American history.
This article reviews the parallel histories of state and federal treason prosecutions. It then analyzes …
The Diverging Right(S) To Bear Arms: Private Armament And The Second And Fourteenth Amendments In Historical Context, Alexander Gouzoules
The Diverging Right(S) To Bear Arms: Private Armament And The Second And Fourteenth Amendments In Historical Context, Alexander Gouzoules
Faculty Publications
This article compares the historical evolution of the social understanding of private armament with contemporary legal doctrine on the right to bear arms. The District of Columbia v. Heller decision, which held that the Second Amendment protects a personal right to self-defense, and the McDonald v. City of Chicago decision, which held the Second Amendment to be incorporated by the Fourteenth Amendment, both turned on extensive historical analysis. But by reading a broad “individual right to self-defense” into both the Second and Fourteenth Amendments, the Court assumed continuity between the social understandings at the time of these amendments’ respective ratifications. …
Confronting Coventurers: Coconspirator Hearsay, Sir Walter Raleigh, And The Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause, Ben L. Trachtenberg
Confronting Coventurers: Coconspirator Hearsay, Sir Walter Raleigh, And The Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause, Ben L. Trachtenberg
Faculty Publications
Using the example of a recent major terrorism prosecution, this article addresses “coventurer hearsay” in the context of the ongoing Confrontation Clause debate concerning the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Crawford v. Washington. Courts have recently begun admitting hearsay evidence pursuant to a revisionist interpretation of the coconspirator statement exception to the hearsay rule. Under the new “lawful joint venture” theory, a hearsay statement may be admitted as a coconspirator statement if made in furtherance of a “joint undertaking” - defined as pretty much any cooperative activity - even if the “conspiracy” is not illegal. Because this new interpretation …