Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (4)
- Selected Works (3)
- University of Colorado Law School (3)
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (2)
-
- University of Kentucky (2)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (2)
- Valparaiso University (2)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
- Chapman University Dale E. Fowler School of Law (1)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (1)
- SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah (1)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (1)
- SelectedWorks (1)
- St. John's University School of Law (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of Missouri School of Law (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (1)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (1)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (1)
- University of San Diego (1)
- Publication
-
- All Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (4)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (2)
- Faculty Publications (2)
- Jan L Jacobowitz (2)
-
- Kentucky Law Journal (2)
- Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Oklahoma Law Review (2)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (2)
- University of Colorado Law Review (2)
- Articles (1)
- Articles & Book Chapters (1)
- Avihay Dorfman (1)
- Ira P. Robbins (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Lawrence Rosenthal (1)
- NYLS Law Review (1)
- Publications (1)
- San Diego International Law Journal (1)
- Scholarly Works (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (1)
- University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class (1)
- Utah Law Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (1)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 39 of 39
Full-Text Articles in Law
Prediction Markets And The First Amendment, Miriam A. Cherry, Robert L. Rogers
Prediction Markets And The First Amendment, Miriam A. Cherry, Robert L. Rogers
All Faculty Scholarship
The continuing development of prediction markets is important because of their success in foretelling the future in politics, economics, and science. In this article, we identify the expressive elements inherent in prediction markets and explore how legislation such as the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006 might harm such predictive speech. This article is the first to explore First Amendment protections for prediction markets in such depth, and in so doing, we distinguish prediction markets from other regulated areas such as gambling and securities trading. The article's examination of prediction markets also illustrates the limitations of current commercial speech …
Who Owns 'Hillary.Com'? Political Speech And The First Amendment In Cyberspace, Jacqueline D. Lipton
Who Owns 'Hillary.Com'? Political Speech And The First Amendment In Cyberspace, Jacqueline D. Lipton
Articles
In the lead-up to the next presidential election, it will be important for candidates both to maintain an online presence and to exercise control over bad faith uses of domain names and web content related to their campaigns. What are the legal implications for the domain name system? Although, for example, Senator Hillary Clinton now owns "hillaryclinton.com", the more generic "hillary.com" is registered to a software firm, Hillary Software, Inc. What about "hillary2008.com"? It is registered to someone outside the Clinton campaign and is not currently in active use. This article examines the large gaps and inconsistencies in current domain …
Creating Masculine Identities: Bullying And Harassment "Because Of Sex", Ann C. Mcginley
Creating Masculine Identities: Bullying And Harassment "Because Of Sex", Ann C. Mcginley
University of Colorado Law Review
This Article deals with group harassment of women and men in the workplace under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. In Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, the Supreme Court held that Title VII forbids harassment by members of the same sex, but it also emphasized that Title VII is implicated only if the harassment occurs "because of sex." Oncale's "because of sex" requirement has spawned considerable confusion in same-sex and different sex harassment cases. This Article focuses on four fact patterns that confuse courts, scholars, and employment lawyers. In the first scenario, men harass women in traditionally male …
Whither The Pickering Rights Of Federal Employees?, Paul M. Secunda
Whither The Pickering Rights Of Federal Employees?, Paul M. Secunda
University of Colorado Law Review
As a result of the Supreme Court's 1983 decision in Bush v. Lucas, federal employees are not permitted to bring Bivens constitutional tort claims directly to federal court to vindicate their First Amendment rights to free speech under Pickering v. Board of Education. Instead, the Bush Court found that Congress had established an effective, alternative statutory scheme for vindication of such claims under the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978. This places federal employees in a less favorable predicament than their state and local employee counterparts who are able to directly proceed to court on their First Amendment retaliation claims …
Government Workers And Government Speech, Helen Norton
Government Workers And Government Speech, Helen Norton
Publications
This essay, to be published in the First Amendment Law Review's forthcoming symposium issue on Public Citizens, Public Servants: Free Speech in the Post-Garcetti Workplace, critiques the Supreme Court's decision in Garcetti v. Ceballos as reflecting a distorted understanding of government speech that overstates government's own expressive interests while undermining the public's interest in transparent government.
In Garcetti, the Court held that the First Amendment does not protect public employees' speech made "pursuant to their official duties," concluding that a government employer should remain free to exercise "employer control over what the employer itself has commissioned or created." …
A Cross To Bear: The Need To Weigh Context In Determining The Constitutionality Of Religious Symbols On Public Land, Catherine Ansello
A Cross To Bear: The Need To Weigh Context In Determining The Constitutionality Of Religious Symbols On Public Land, Catherine Ansello
University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class
No abstract provided.
Do Churches Matter? Towards An Institutional Understanding Of The Religion Clauses, Richard W. Garnett
Do Churches Matter? Towards An Institutional Understanding Of The Religion Clauses, Richard W. Garnett
Journal Articles
In recent years, several prominent scholars have called attention to the importance and role of First Amendment institutions and there is a growing body of work informed by an appreciation for what Professor Balkin calls the infrastructure of free expression. The freedom of expression, he suggests, requires more than mere absence of government censorship or prohibition to thrive; [it] also require[s] institutions, practices and technological structures that foster and promote [it]. The intuition animating this scholarship, then, is that the freedom of expression is not only enjoyed by and through, but also depends on the existence and flourishing of, certain …
Symbolic Speech: A Message From Mind To Mind, James M. Mcgoldrick Jr.
Symbolic Speech: A Message From Mind To Mind, James M. Mcgoldrick Jr.
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Prediction Markets And The First Amendment, Miriam A. Cherry, Robert L. Rogers
Prediction Markets And The First Amendment, Miriam A. Cherry, Robert L. Rogers
Faculty Publications
The continuing development of prediction markets is important because of their success in foretelling the future in politics, economics, and science. In this article, we identify the expressive elements inherent in prediction markets and explore how legislation such as the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006 might harm such predictive speech. This article is the first to explore First Amendment protections for prediction markets in such depth, and in so doing, we distinguish prediction markets from other regulated areas such as gambling, commodities, and securities trading. The article’s examination of prediction markets also illustrates the limitations of current commercial …