Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Pepperdine University (41)
- Selected Works (23)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (21)
- SelectedWorks (14)
- University of Michigan Law School (12)
-
- University of Richmond (7)
- American University Washington College of Law (6)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (5)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (5)
- Boston University School of Law (4)
- Mercer University School of Law (4)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (4)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (4)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (3)
- Duke Law (3)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (3)
- William & Mary Law School (3)
- Georgia State University College of Law (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- Singapore Management University (2)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (2)
- UC Law SF (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- University of South Carolina (2)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (2)
- West Virginia University (2)
- Barry University School of Law (1)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Campbell University School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (73)
- Testimony (18)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (12)
- Confrontation Clause (11)
- Exclusionary rule (11)
-
- Fourth Amendment (11)
- Admissibility (10)
- New York (10)
- Constitutional Law (9)
- Hearsay (9)
- Sixth Amendment (9)
- Criminal Procedure (8)
- Searches and seizures (8)
- Cross-examination (7)
- Intellectual Property (7)
- Police (7)
- Scientific Evidence (7)
- Search and Seizure (7)
- Witnesses (7)
- Crime (6)
- Impeachment (6)
- Juries (6)
- Privacy (6)
- Child abuse (5)
- Criminal (5)
- Discovery (5)
- Electronically stored information (5)
- Fifth Amendment (5)
- Litigation (5)
- Schwartz (5)
- Publication
-
- Pepperdine Law Review (39)
- Touro Law Review (21)
- Faculty Scholarship (12)
- Articles (8)
- Faculty Publications (7)
-
- All Faculty Scholarship (5)
- Reports (5)
- Richmond Journal of Law & Technology (5)
- Valerie P. Hans (5)
- Mercer Law Review (4)
- Thomas D. Lyon (4)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (3)
- Christopher J. Buccafusco (3)
- Martin A. Schwartz (3)
- Maryland Law Review (3)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (3)
- Catholic University Law Review (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal (2)
- Publications (2)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (2)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (2)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (2)
- Villanova Law Review (2)
- West Virginia Law Review (2)
- William & Mary Law Review (2)
- Abdullahi Saliu Ishola (1)
- Alan Raphael (1)
- American Indian Law Review (1)
- Ariel Porat (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 60 of 209
Full-Text Articles in Law
Judicial Review And The Exclusionary Rule, Morgan Cloud
Judicial Review And The Exclusionary Rule, Morgan Cloud
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Importance Of Being Empirical, Michael Heise
The Importance Of Being Empirical, Michael Heise
Pepperdine Law Review
Legal scholarship is becoming increasingly empirical. Although empirical methodologies gain important influence within the legal academy, their application in legal research remains underdeveloped. This paper surveys and analyzes the state of empirical legal scholarship and explores possible influences on its production. The paper advances a normative argument for increased empirical legal scholarship.
Moving Further Beyond, Thomas M. Reavley
An Invitation To Dialogue: Exploring The Pepperdine Proposal To Move Beyond The Exclusionary Rule, L. Timothy Perrin, H. Mitchell Caldwell, Carol A. Chase
An Invitation To Dialogue: Exploring The Pepperdine Proposal To Move Beyond The Exclusionary Rule, L. Timothy Perrin, H. Mitchell Caldwell, Carol A. Chase
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Unreliability Of Testimony From A Witness With Multiple Personality Disorder (Mpd): Why Courts Must Acknowledge The Connection Between Hypnosis And Mpd And Adopt A “Per Se” Rule Of Exclusion For Mpd Testimony, Mark Anthony Miller
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Substance And Method In The Year 2000, Akhil Reed Amar
Substance And Method In The Year 2000, Akhil Reed Amar
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Law Enforcement And Criminal Law Decisions, Erwin Chemerinsky
Law Enforcement And Criminal Law Decisions, Erwin Chemerinsky
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Bullshit!: Why The Retroactive Application Of Federal Rules Of Evidence 413-414 And State Counterparts Violates The Ex Post Facto Clause, Colin Miller
Faculty Publications
In Calder v. Bull, the Supreme Court recognized four types of laws that cannot be applied retroactively consistent with the Ex Post Facto Clause, including “[e]very law that alters the legal rules of evidence, and receives less, or different, testimony, than the law required at the time of the commission of the offence, in order to convict the offender.” But, in its opinion in Carmell v. Texas, the Court determined that ordinary rules of evidence do not violate the Clause because they (1) are “evenhanded, in the sense that they may benefit either the State or the defendant in a …
The Judicial Discretion To Exclude Relevant Evidence: Perspectives From An Indian Evidence Act Jurisdiction, Siyuan Chen
The Judicial Discretion To Exclude Relevant Evidence: Perspectives From An Indian Evidence Act Jurisdiction, Siyuan Chen
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
Stephen’s ground-breaking Indian Evidence Act contained ideas that appear unfamiliar in the context of modern rules of evidence. Singapore is an Indian Evidence Act jurisdiction which has retained those ideas, such as the non-distinction between relevance and admissibility, the framing of exclusionary rules in inclusionary terms, and the prohibition against relying on common law developments inconsistent with the Evidence Act. These peculiarities should have presented obstacles to the applicability of the common law concept of the judicial discretion to exclude relevant evidence, but this has not been the case. In this article, I first suggest why Singapore courts might have …
Reliability And Relevance As The Touchstones For Admissibility Of Evidence In Criminal Proceedings, Siyuan Chen, Nicholas Poon
Reliability And Relevance As The Touchstones For Admissibility Of Evidence In Criminal Proceedings, Siyuan Chen, Nicholas Poon
Siyuan CHEN
The Court of Appeal in Muhammad bin Kadar v PP [2011] 3 SLR 1205 (“Kadar”) formally recognised the judicial discretion to exclude evidence as an integral part of the law on criminal evidence in Singapore. This discretion, the court held, would help ensure that all evidence coming before the court would be as reliable as possible. While this commentary agrees that the foundational basis for the exclusionary discretion doctrine is desirable, it suggests that there are difficulties with the application of the doctrine. An alternative approach that works around the difficulties is canvassed for consideration.
The Psychotherapist And The Attorney/Client Privileges As They Arise In Civil Rights Disputes, Lewis M. Wasserman
The Psychotherapist And The Attorney/Client Privileges As They Arise In Civil Rights Disputes, Lewis M. Wasserman
Touro Law Review
This article briefly reviews the elements of the psychotherapist-patient and attorney-client privileges and how these privileges may be waived in the context of federal civil rights litigation.
The Fourth Amendment And The Stored Communications Act: Why The Warrantless Gathering Of Historical Cell Site Location Information Poses No Threat To Privacy , Kyle Malone
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Experience-Based Opinion Testimony: Strengthening The Lay Opinion Rule , Anne Bowen Poulin
Experience-Based Opinion Testimony: Strengthening The Lay Opinion Rule , Anne Bowen Poulin
Pepperdine Law Review
Determining whether experience-based opinion should be evaluated as lay or as expert opinion has proven particularly challenging to the courts. The Federal Rules of Evidence were amended in 2000, adopting specific, more stringent requirements for expert testimony and hardening the line between lay and expert opinion. Expert opinion testimony is admissible only if based on reliable methodology, whereas lay opinion must be rationally derived using everyday reasoning. The decisions applying the rules do not strike the right balance in regard to experience-based opinion. Too often, courts either accept claims of experience-based expertise at face value or admit experience-based opinion as …
Sana Crítica: The System For Weighing Evidence Utilized By The Inter-American Court Of Human Rights, Álvaro Paúl
Sana Crítica: The System For Weighing Evidence Utilized By The Inter-American Court Of Human Rights, Álvaro Paúl
Buffalo Human Rights Law Review
The Spanish version of the case law of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights often states that this tribunal's as- sessment of evidence is ruled by saia crilica, a notion which has received several translations in the English ver- sion of the Court's case law. This concept has a clear mean- ing in the Hispanic civil law tradition. Sana critica is a system for evaluating the weight of evidence whereby a court or tribunal is not constrained by the evidentiary rules of legal proo but must judge in accordance with the rules of logic and experience, and state the grounds …
Reliability And Relevance As The Touchstones For Admissibility Of Evidence In Criminal Proceedings: Muhammad Bin Kadar V Pp [2011] 3 Slr 1205 [Case Note], Siyuan Chen
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
The Court of Appeal in Muhammad bin Kadar v PP [2011] 3 SLR 1205 (“Kadar”) formally recognised the judicial discretion to exclude evidence as an integral part of the law on criminal evidence in Singapore. This discretion, the court held, would help ensure that all evidence coming before the court would be as reliable as possible. While this commentary agrees that the foundational basis for the exclusionary discretion doctrine is desirable, it suggests that there are difficulties with the application of the doctrine. An alternative approach that works around the difficulties is canvassed for consideration.
Confrontation Clause And Testimonial Evidence: After Two Supreme Court Decisions, Standard Remains Unclear., Alan Raphael
Confrontation Clause And Testimonial Evidence: After Two Supreme Court Decisions, Standard Remains Unclear., Alan Raphael
Alan Raphael
No abstract provided.
Science On Law's Terms: Implications Of Procedural Legitimacy On Scientific Evidence, Nayha Acharya
Science On Law's Terms: Implications Of Procedural Legitimacy On Scientific Evidence, Nayha Acharya
LLM Theses
Scientific evidence is relied on more and more in litigation. Discussions and debates aimed at enabling courts to make the best use scientific evidence are increasingly critical. This thesis adds the perspective of procedural legitimacy to the science and law discussion. Procedural Legitimacy is the concept that consistent adherence to legal procedure maintains the overall legitimacy of the legal system, and the validity of its outcomes. I argue that the integrity of legal procedures must be maintained where scientific evidence is presented, so that judicial decisions that rely on scientific evidence are legitimate.
Testimonial Statements: The Death Of Dying Declarations? - People V. Clay, Sarah R. Gitomer
Testimonial Statements: The Death Of Dying Declarations? - People V. Clay, Sarah R. Gitomer
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Decline Of The Confrontation Clause In New York - People V. Encarnacion, Anthony Fasano
The Decline Of The Confrontation Clause In New York - People V. Encarnacion, Anthony Fasano
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
An Unappealing Decision For New York Dwi Defendants - People V. Pealer, Christopher Gavin
An Unappealing Decision For New York Dwi Defendants - People V. Pealer, Christopher Gavin
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Eavesdropping Under New York And Federal Law: How New York Is Departing From Long-Standing Interpretations Mirroring Federal Law - People V. Rabb, Bailey Ince
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Turn-Coat Disclosure: The Importance Of Following Procedure - Turturro V. City Of New York, Brittany A. Fiorenza
Turn-Coat Disclosure: The Importance Of Following Procedure - Turturro V. City Of New York, Brittany A. Fiorenza
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
New York’S Grant Of Greater Fifth Amendment Rights To Sexual Predators In Somta Proceedings - New York V. Suggs, Lina R. Carbuccia
New York’S Grant Of Greater Fifth Amendment Rights To Sexual Predators In Somta Proceedings - New York V. Suggs, Lina R. Carbuccia
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Trial Error Blunder: Compounded Use Of Defendant’S Post-Arrest Silence For Impeachment And Summation Purposes Is Not Harmless - People V. Tucker, Robert Mitchell
Trial Error Blunder: Compounded Use Of Defendant’S Post-Arrest Silence For Impeachment And Summation Purposes Is Not Harmless - People V. Tucker, Robert Mitchell
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Vehicle Checkpoints: The Ever-Expanding Array Of Purposes For Which A Vehicle May Be Stopped - People V. Gavenda, Jan Lucas
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Roving Border Patrols In New York – Sometimes The Drug Smuggler Does Not Get Convicted: The Legal Limitations Regarding Vehicle Stops And Consent Searches Based Upon Reasonable Suspicion - People V. Banisadr, Robert Mitchell
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Do Automobile Passengers Have A Legitimate Expectation Of Privacy? An Analysis Of Reasonable Expectation Under The Fourth Amendment - People V. Howard, Lisa Belrose
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Carga De La Prueba, Felipe Marín
Law And Justice On The Small Screen, Jessica Silbey
Law And Justice On The Small Screen, Jessica Silbey
Books
'Law and Justice on the Small Screen' is a wide-ranging collection of essays about law in and on television. In light of the book's innovative taxonomy of the field and its international reach, it will make a novel contribution to the scholarly literature about law and popular culture. Television shows from France, Canada, the United Kingdom, Germany, Spain and the United States are discussed. The essays are organised into three sections: (1) methodological questions regarding the analysis of law and popular culture on television; (2) a focus on genre studies within television programming (including a subsection on reality television), and …
The Propriety Of Jury Questioning: A Remedy For Perceived Harmless Error, Laurie Forbes Neff
The Propriety Of Jury Questioning: A Remedy For Perceived Harmless Error, Laurie Forbes Neff
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.