Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (30)
- Selected Works (8)
- Cleveland State University (4)
- University of Richmond (4)
- West Virginia University (4)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (3)
- Cornell University Law School (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (3)
- University of South Carolina (3)
- St. Mary's University (2)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (2)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (2)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
- William & Mary Law School (2)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (1)
- Trinity College (1)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Missouri School of Law (1)
- University of Missouri, St. Louis (1)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (1)
- University of Tennessee, Knoxville (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review (13)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (12)
- Cleveland State Law Review (4)
- Faculty Publications (4)
- Faculty Scholarship (4)
-
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (4)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (3)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (3)
- Michael Heise (3)
- Mitchell Hamline Law Review (3)
- West Virginia Law Review (3)
- Indiana Law Journal (2)
- Law Student Publications (2)
- Sharon E. Rush (2)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Articles (1)
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- Candace Kovacic-Fleischer (1)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (1)
- Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects (1)
- Dissertations (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (1)
- Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Journal Publications (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 91 - 94 of 94
Full-Text Articles in Law
Constitutional Law--Public School Desegregation--Pupil Placement Plan, Robert Glenn Lilly Jr.
Constitutional Law--Public School Desegregation--Pupil Placement Plan, Robert Glenn Lilly Jr.
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law - Equal Protection - Legality Of Plans For Maintaining School Segregation, John B. Huck
Constitutional Law - Equal Protection - Legality Of Plans For Maintaining School Segregation, John B. Huck
Michigan Law Review
On May 19, 1954, the Supreme Court of the United States declared that segregation in public schools was a denial of equal protection of the law. Since that date many and varied plans have been proposed to maintain segregated education by avoiding the impact of the decision. The legality of three of these proposed avoidance devices will be analyzed in this comment.
The School Segregation Cases: A Comment, Paul H. Sanders
The School Segregation Cases: A Comment, Paul H. Sanders
Vanderbilt Law Review
Segregation in the public schools on the basis of race or color pursuant to law has been declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of the United States.' Such segregation, the Court says, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. The unanimous opinions of the Court delivered by Chief Justice Warren, declare this to be so regardless of the "equality" of the "tangible factors" in such educational facilities. This action, of paramount significance during the term just ended, will have a sequel of …
The Fourteenth Amendment And The "Separate But Equal" Doctrine, Joseph S. Ransmeier
The Fourteenth Amendment And The "Separate But Equal" Doctrine, Joseph S. Ransmeier
Michigan Law Review
Recent cases in which the Court has overthrown enforced separation in public higher education on the ground of inequality but without consideration of the merits of the separate but equal rule have been the occasion for an outpouring of law review discussion on the subject. The present paper is a part of this stream. Its purpose is two-fold: first, to set forth the judicial history of the modern separate but equal rule, noting its pre-Fourteenth Amendment origin and the rather uncritical manner in which courts permitted it to infiltrate its way from one area of the law to another; and …