Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (15)
- University of Colorado Law School (6)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (4)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (4)
- Columbia Law School (3)
-
- Roger Williams University (3)
- University of Missouri School of Law (3)
- Boston University School of Law (2)
- Cleveland State University (2)
- Cornell University Law School (2)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (2)
- Georgetown University Law Center (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- Penn State Law (2)
- University of Baltimore Law (2)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (2)
- University of Miami Law School (2)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (1)
- Liberty University (1)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Pace University (1)
- St. John's University School of Law (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Articles (16)
- Publications (7)
- All Faculty Scholarship (6)
- Faculty Scholarship (6)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (4)
-
- Faculty Publications (4)
- Journal Articles (3)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Articles & Chapters (2)
- Book Chapters (2)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (2)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2)
- Journal Publications (2)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (2)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (1)
- Court Briefs (1)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (1)
- JCLC Online (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Scholarly Articles (1)
- Senior Honors Theses (1)
- Supreme Court Case Files (1)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (1)
Articles 61 - 72 of 72
Full-Text Articles in Law
Habeas After The Revolution, Joseph L. Hoffmann, William J. Stuntz
Habeas After The Revolution, Joseph L. Hoffmann, William J. Stuntz
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Confessions, Criminals, And Community, Sheri Lynn Johnson
Confessions, Criminals, And Community, Sheri Lynn Johnson
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Postsentence Sentencing: Determining Probation Revocation Sanctions, Bradford Mank
Postsentence Sentencing: Determining Probation Revocation Sanctions, Bradford Mank
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
Although procedural due process requirements govern the proof of a violation in a probation revocation hearing, judges exercise almost total discretion in deciding what sanctions to impose once a violation is established. These postsentence judgments can be as important as the initial sentencing. Sanctions for even minor probation violations can range from obligating a probationer to meet with his probation officer more frequently to executing a suspended prison sentence. The Supreme Court recognized in Morrissey v. Brewer that the choice of sanctions is often more complex than the proof of a violation. Principles must be developed to regulate postsentence sentencing. …
Pennsylvania V. Ritchie, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Pennsylvania V. Ritchie, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Gates, Leon And The Compromise Of Adjudicatory Fairness: (Part Ii)-Aggressive Majoritarianism, Willful Deafness, And The New Exception To The Exclusionary Rule, Joel J. Finer
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
This Article will offer an elaboration of the idea of judicial "aggressiveness" (which Professor Stone, by and large, leaves undefined) through examination of the majority opinion in United States v. Leon and its application in Massachusetts v. Sheppard. It will also advance the thesis that the majority in Leon exhibited a particular kind of aggressiveness--willful deafness.
Compulsory Process, Right To, Peter K. Westen
Compulsory Process, Right To, Peter K. Westen
Book Chapters
The first state to adopt a constitution following the Declaration of Independence (New Jersey, 1776) guaranteed all criminal defendants the same ‘‘privileges of witnesses’’ as their prosecutors. Fifteen years later, in enumerating the constitutional rights of accused persons, the framers of the federal Bill of Rights bifurcated what New Jersey called the ‘‘privileges of witnesses’’ into two distinct but related rights: the Sixth Amendment right of the accused ‘‘to be confronted with the witnesses against him,’’ and his companion Sixth Amendment right to ‘‘compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor.’’ The distinction between witnesses ‘‘against’’ the accused and witnesses …
Gates, Leon And The Compromise Of Adjudicatory Fairness: (Part I)-A Dialogue On Prejudicial Concurrences, Joel J. Finer
Gates, Leon And The Compromise Of Adjudicatory Fairness: (Part I)-A Dialogue On Prejudicial Concurrences, Joel J. Finer
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
On July 5, 1984, the Supreme Court in Leon v. United States held that where law enforcement officials execute a search warrant issued in violation of the dictates of the fourth amendment but act in the "good faith," "objectively-reasonable" belief that the warrant was constitutionally valid, the fruits of the search should not (with a few exceptions) be excluded from evidence under the exclusionary rule. On June 8, 1983, in Illinois v. Gates, the Supreme Court, after calling for and receiving briefs and arguments on the same issue of whether the exclusionary rule should be modified, concluded, for reasons of …
Cross-Racial Identification Errors In Criminal Cases, Sheri Johnson
Cross-Racial Identification Errors In Criminal Cases, Sheri Johnson
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Havens, Jenkins, And Salvucci, And The Defendant's "Right" To Testify, Craig M. Bradley
Havens, Jenkins, And Salvucci, And The Defendant's "Right" To Testify, Craig M. Bradley
Articles by Maurer Faculty
Three recent Supreme Court opinions that enlarge the scope of permissible impeachment may substantially influence the criminal defendant's decision whether to take the stand. In this article, Professor Bradley evaluates the current status of the defendant's "right" to testify, assesses the impact of these cases on that right, and offers cogent advice on effective strategies for practitioners.
Competency To Stand Trial In Federal Courts: Conceptual And Constitutional Problems, William T. Pizzi
Competency To Stand Trial In Federal Courts: Conceptual And Constitutional Problems, William T. Pizzi
Publications
No abstract provided.
Kauper's 'Judicial Examination Of The Accused' Forty Years Later—Some Comments On A Remarkable Article, Yale Kamisar
Kauper's 'Judicial Examination Of The Accused' Forty Years Later—Some Comments On A Remarkable Article, Yale Kamisar
Articles
For a long time before Professor Paul Kauper wrote "Judicial Examination of the Accused" in 1932, and for a long time thereafter, the "legal mind" shut out the de facto inquisitorial system that characterized American criminal procedure. Paul Kauper could not look away. He recognized the "naked, ugly facts" (p. 1224) and was determined to do something about them -more than thirty years before Escobedo v. Illinois' or Miranda v. Arizona.2
Gideon V. Wainwright: The Art Of Overruling, Jerold H. Israel
Gideon V. Wainwright: The Art Of Overruling, Jerold H. Israel
Articles
During the 1962 Term, the Supreme Court, on a single Monday, announced six decisions concerned with constitutional limitations upon state criminal procedure. The most publicized of these, though probably not the most important in terms of legal theory or practical effect, was Gideon v. Wainwright. In an era of constantly expanding federal restrictions on state criminal processes, the holding of Gideon-that an indigent defendant in a state criminal prosecution has an unqualified right to the appointment of counsel-was hardly startling. And while Gideon will obviously have an important effect in the handful of states that still fail to appoint counsel …