Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (5)
- Columbia Law School (4)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (4)
- Pace University (2)
- UIC School of Law (2)
-
- University of Colorado Law School (2)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- California Western School of Law (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- Singapore Management University (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of Michigan Law School (1)
- University of Tulsa College of Law (1)
- Valparaiso University (1)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal procedure (4)
- Criminal justice (3)
- Sentencing (3)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (2)
- Habeas corpus (2)
-
- Juries (2)
- Plea bargaining (2)
- Prosecutors (2)
- Teague v. Lane (2)
- Admissibility (1)
- Admission of hearsay (1)
- Adolescent violence (1)
- Allocution (1)
- Australian criminal procedure (1)
- Book review (1)
- Butler v. McKellar (1)
- CBA Court-Appointed Counsel Task Force (1)
- Capital punishment (1)
- Chief Justice Directives (1)
- Coercion (1)
- Colorado (1)
- Colorado Constitution (1)
- Colorado Rules of Criminal Procedure (1)
- Comparative criminal law (1)
- Confession (1)
- Confessions (1)
- Congressional repeal (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Corporate criminal (1)
- Courtroom practices (1)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (8)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (5)
- Faculty Works (4)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Publications (2)
-
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Articles (1)
- Articles, Chapters in Books and Other Contributions to Scholarly Works (1)
- California Joint Committees (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 30
Full-Text Articles in Law
Legislating Confession Law In Great Britain: A Statutory Approach To Police Interrogations, Mark Berger
Legislating Confession Law In Great Britain: A Statutory Approach To Police Interrogations, Mark Berger
Faculty Works
The police interrogation process has been a subject of controversy in both Great Britain and the United States. The debate has focused on how to regulate the police and thereby balance the public interest in crime control against the individual interest in freedom from state coercion. In the U.S regulation of the police interrogation process has largely been the result of U.S. Supreme Court interpretations of the self-incrimination privilege of the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. In contrast, in Great Britain police interrogation controls have been enacted by Parliament in the Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE), supplemented by …
The Most Fundamental Change In The Criminal Justice System: The Role Of The Prosecutor In Sentence Reduction, Bennett L. Gershman
The Most Fundamental Change In The Criminal Justice System: The Role Of The Prosecutor In Sentence Reduction, Bennett L. Gershman
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
As every lawyer knows, the prosecutor is the most powerful figure in the American criminal justice system. The prosecutor decides whom to charge, what charges to bring, whether to permit a defendant to plead guilty, and whether to confer immunity. In carrying out this broad decision-making power, the prosecutor enjoys considerable independence. Indeed, one of the most elusive and vexing subjects in criminal justice has been to define the limits of the prosecutor’s discretion.
The Hong Kong Jury: A Microcosm Of Society?, Peter Duff, Mark Findlay, Carla Howarth
The Hong Kong Jury: A Microcosm Of Society?, Peter Duff, Mark Findlay, Carla Howarth
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
The claim that the jury is a randomly chosen and representative sample of community is an important part of the ideology which currently underpins the institution. Supporters of the jury argue that both its impartiality and its independence from the State are bolstered by the fact that it represents a randomly selected cross-section of the populace. In most common law jurisdictions where the jury operates, various steps have been taken over recent years in order preserve and strengthen the perception of the jury as a "microcosm of democratic society". For example, in England the property qualification for jurors was removed …
The Self-Incrimination Debate, Mark Berger
The Changing Face Of Retroactivity, John H. Blume, William Pratt
The Changing Face Of Retroactivity, John H. Blume, William Pratt
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
Teague v. Lane marked, in the eyes of many, an attempt by the United States Supreme Court to judicially limit the scope of federal habeas corpus review. In Teague, a plurality of the Court held that new rules of criminal procedure do not apply retroactively to cases which have already become final on direct review at the time the new rule is decided. Thus, in most cases, a petitioner in collateral proceedings will not receive the benefit of any new rules decided after his conviction is affirmed on direct appeal and the United States Supreme Court denies certiorari. Moreover, …
In Case Of Confession, Andrea Lyon
The Admission Of Government Fact Findings Under Federal Rule Of Evidence 803(8)(C): Limiting The Dangers Of Unreliable Hearsay, Steven P. Grossman, Stephen J. Shapiro
The Admission Of Government Fact Findings Under Federal Rule Of Evidence 803(8)(C): Limiting The Dangers Of Unreliable Hearsay, Steven P. Grossman, Stephen J. Shapiro
All Faculty Scholarship
Federal Rule of Evidence 803(8)(C), an exception to the rule against admission of hearsay, permits introduction of public records or reports containing the fact findings of the reporter without requiring the reporter to appear at trial. These fact findings can be based upon the reporter's own observations and calculations or information imparted to the reporter from sources having no connection to any public agency whatsoever. Rule 803(8)(C) has also been used as the vehicle for presenting juries with fact findings from hearings conducted by public officials. The rule would seem to allow these fact findings even though the opponent had …
The Adversarial System At Risk, Bennett L. Gershman
The Adversarial System At Risk, Bennett L. Gershman
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
The most ominous recent development affecting the balance of forces in the adversary system is the unprecedented attack by prosecutors on criminal defense lawyers themselves. Grand jury subpoenas to attorneys, law office searches, disqualification motions, fee forfeiture proceedings, and, most recently, IRS attempts to enforce currency-reporting regulations do not seem to be isolated occurrences or mere happenstance. Rather, perhaps inspired by Shakespeare's injunction in Henry VI to "kill all the lawyers," some prosecutors appear to have concluded that the most effective way to prevail in the battle against crime is to cripple the defense lawyers, particularly those who represent defendants …
Hearing On Determinate And Indeterminate Sentencing, Joint Committee For Revision Of The Penal Code
Hearing On Determinate And Indeterminate Sentencing, Joint Committee For Revision Of The Penal Code
California Joint Committees
No abstract provided.
Waiver Of Constitutional Issues In Criminal Cases: Confusion In The Illinois Supreme Court, 11 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 55 (1990), Timothy P. O'Neill
Waiver Of Constitutional Issues In Criminal Cases: Confusion In The Illinois Supreme Court, 11 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 55 (1990), Timothy P. O'Neill
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Vindicating The Defendant's Constitutional Right To Testify At A Criminal Trial: The Need For An On-The-Record Waiver, 51 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 809 (1990), Timothy P. O'Neill
Vindicating The Defendant's Constitutional Right To Testify At A Criminal Trial: The Need For An On-The-Record Waiver, 51 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 809 (1990), Timothy P. O'Neill
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Use Of The "Zola Plea" In New Jersey Capital Prosecutions, J Thomas Sullivan
Use Of The "Zola Plea" In New Jersey Capital Prosecutions, J Thomas Sullivan
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Racism In The Adversary System: The Defendant's Use Of Peremptory Challenges, J. Alexander Tanford
Racism In The Adversary System: The Defendant's Use Of Peremptory Challenges, J. Alexander Tanford
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
The Law And Psychology Of Jury Instructions, J. Alexander Tanford
The Law And Psychology Of Jury Instructions, J. Alexander Tanford
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
More Than "Slightly Retro:" The Rehnquist Court's Rout Of Habeas Corpus Jurisdiction In Teague V. Lane, James S. Liebman
More Than "Slightly Retro:" The Rehnquist Court's Rout Of Habeas Corpus Jurisdiction In Teague V. Lane, James S. Liebman
Faculty Scholarship
Someone I know, more a student of contemporary fashion than I, sometimes describes people dressed in uniformly dark clothing as "slightly retro." I am not sure of the allusion, but what I can discern leads me to think that the Supreme Court's nonretroactivity decisions beginning with Teague v. Lane are – puns aside – more than just "slightly retro."
The Court's innovation may be stated as follows: For 160 years, Congress empowered federal judges to order state officials to release or retry individuals held in custody in violation of federal law as those federal judges, and not the state officials, …
Rethinking Custodial Interrogation, Daniel B. Yeager
Rethinking Custodial Interrogation, Daniel B. Yeager
Faculty Scholarship
This Article attempts to resurrect a concept crucial to the Supreme Court lexicon. It is not, however, a police manual. This Article concerns itself solely with questions surrounding the admissibility of confessions, and in so doing, attempts to show that only a reconsideration of custodial interrogation can restore the "significant deprivations" language to the status granted it in Miranda v. Arizona.
Retroactivity And The Great Writ: How Congress Should Respond To Teague V. Lane, Joseph L. Hoffmann
Retroactivity And The Great Writ: How Congress Should Respond To Teague V. Lane, Joseph L. Hoffmann
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Criminal Procedure In The "Land Of Oz": Lessons For America, Craig M. Bradley
Criminal Procedure In The "Land Of Oz": Lessons For America, Craig M. Bradley
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Foreword: Structuring Sentencing Discretion: The New Federal Sentencing Guidelines, Ilene H. Nagel
Foreword: Structuring Sentencing Discretion: The New Federal Sentencing Guidelines, Ilene H. Nagel
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Tape Recording Conversations - Is It Ethical For Attorneys?, Charles W. Adams
Tape Recording Conversations - Is It Ethical For Attorneys?, Charles W. Adams
Articles, Chapters in Books and Other Contributions to Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Solving The Pretext Puzzle: The Importance Of Ulterior Motives And Fabrications In The Supreme Court's Fourth Amendment Pretext Doctrine, Edwin J. Butterfoss
Solving The Pretext Puzzle: The Importance Of Ulterior Motives And Fabrications In The Supreme Court's Fourth Amendment Pretext Doctrine, Edwin J. Butterfoss
Faculty Scholarship
This Article first analyzes the debate between Professors John M. Burkoff and James B. Haddad over the current state of Supreme Court jurisprudence on the pretext issue. It shows that the Supreme Court's definition of pretext is broader than the definition of pretext used by these commentators. The Supreme Court's definition includes both "legal" and fabricated pretexts. In a "legal" pretext, the government offers a justification that is not the true reason for the police activity, but that, if the motivation of the officer is not considered, legally justifies the activity. In a fabricated pretext, the government offers a justification …
Form And Function In The Administration Of Justice: The Bill Of Rights And Federal Habeas Corpus, Larry Yackle
Form And Function In The Administration Of Justice: The Bill Of Rights And Federal Habeas Corpus, Larry Yackle
Faculty Scholarship
Part I critiques the Report's insistence that accurate fact finding exhausts, or nearly exhausts, the objectives of criminal justice, identifies the fundamental role of the Bill of Rights in the American political order, and situates federal habeas corpus within that framework. Part II traces the Report's historical review of the federal habeas jurisdiction and critiques the Report's too-convenient reliance on selected materials that, on examination, fail to undermine conventional understandings of the writ's development as a postconviction remedy. Part III responds to the Report's complaints regarding current habeas corpus practice and refutes contentions that the habeas jurisdiction overburdens federal dockets …
Court-Appointed Attorneys: Old Problems And New Solutions, H. Patrick Furman
Court-Appointed Attorneys: Old Problems And New Solutions, H. Patrick Furman
Publications
No abstract provided.
Book Review, William T. Pizzi
A Conceptual, Practical, And Political Guide To Rico Reform, Gerard E. Lynch
A Conceptual, Practical, And Political Guide To Rico Reform, Gerard E. Lynch
Faculty Scholarship
RICO is nearing its twentieth birthday, but it may not be a happy one. In fact, 'tis the season for critics of RICO to be, if not jolly, at least highly active. A House subcommittee and the Senate Judiciary Committee have held hearings on RICO reform, the popular and business press has published numerous debates and criticisms involving fairly arcane points of civil and criminal law, scholars and lawyers have filled law reviews and legal newspapers with articles often critical of the statute, and the pressure has been building for statutory changes.
As the pressure for change has intensified, and …
Remembering The 'Old World' Of Criminal Procedure: A Reply To Professor Grano, Yale Kamisar
Remembering The 'Old World' Of Criminal Procedure: A Reply To Professor Grano, Yale Kamisar
Articles
When I graduated from high school in 1961, the "old world" of criminal procedure still existed, albeit in its waning days; when I graduated from law school in 1968, circa the time most of today's first-year law students were arriving on the scene, the "new world" had fully dislodged the old. Indeed, the force of the new world's revolutionary impetus already had crested. Some of the change that the criminal procedure revolution effected was for the better, but much of it, at least as some of us see it, was decidedly for the worse. My students, however, cannot make the …
A Step Towards Fairness In Capital Litigation: Missouri Resource Center, Sean O'Brien
A Step Towards Fairness In Capital Litigation: Missouri Resource Center, Sean O'Brien
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
Addressing The Needs Of Attorneys For The Damned, Sean O'Brien
Addressing The Needs Of Attorneys For The Damned, Sean O'Brien
Faculty Works
This article is an introduction to the UMKC Law Review symposium issue dedicated to exploring the topic of capital punishment. UMKC Professor of Law Sean O’Brien shares how the growing importance of capital litigation makes this a timely and appropriate subject for consideration and shares how the university and the Law Review's attention to the death penalty debate contributes to more than just academic discussion.
Determinants Of Judicial Waiver Decisions For Violent Juvenile Offenders, Jeffrey Fagan, Elizabeth Piper Deschens
Determinants Of Judicial Waiver Decisions For Violent Juvenile Offenders, Jeffrey Fagan, Elizabeth Piper Deschens
Faculty Scholarship
The selection of jurisdiction for adjudicating juvenile crime today is one of the most controversial debates in crime control policy, reflecting differences in assumptions about the causes of crime and philosophies of jurisprudence and punishment. For adolescent offenders, especially violent youth whose behaviors may pose particular social danger, critics view the traditional goals of the juvenile court and the "best interests of the child" standard as being at odds with public concerns for retribution and incapacitation of criminals. The choice between jurisdictions is a choice between the nominally rehabilitative dispositions of the juvenile court and the explicitly punitive dispositions of …
"Carrot And Stick" Sentencing: Structuring Incentives For Organizational Defendants, John C. Coffee Jr.
"Carrot And Stick" Sentencing: Structuring Incentives For Organizational Defendants, John C. Coffee Jr.
Faculty Scholarship
The new "Draft Guidelines for Organizational Defendants" released by the U.S. Sentencing Commission on October 25, 1990, explicitly adopt a "'carrot and stick' approach" to sentencing. While the boldly instrumental use made of sentencing penalties and credits in these guidelines will trouble some, the larger question is whether the Commission's social engineering will work. Two issues stand out: First, is the Commission's carrot mightier than its stick? At first glance, this may seem a surprising question because the "stick" in the Commission's guidelines seemingly packs a Ruthian wallop: fines under the draft guidelines are based on a multiple of the …