Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- UIC School of Law (8)
- West Virginia University (7)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (5)
- Brigham Young University Law School (3)
- Cleveland State University (3)
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- University of Kentucky (3)
- University of Michigan Law School (3)
- Florida State University College of Law (2)
- St. Mary's University (2)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (2)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (1)
- Mercer University School of Law (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (1)
- William & Mary Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal procedure (7)
- Right to counsel (3)
- Exclusionary rule (2)
- Federal jurisdiction (2)
- Fourth Amendment (2)
-
- Habeas corpus (2)
- Parole (2)
- Probable cause (2)
- Sentencing (2)
- Sixth Amendment (2)
- Witnesses (2)
- A Conversation With The Police (1)
- ASAP (1)
- Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition (1)
- Adjudicatory hearing (1)
- Alcohol Safety Action Project (1)
- Argersingerv. Hamlin (1)
- Bail Reform Act (1)
- Casebooks (1)
- Chimel v. California. (1)
- Citizens' Probation Authority (1)
- Compulsory Process Clause (1)
- Compulsory process (1)
- Confrontation Clause (1)
- Constitutional Considerations (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Constitutional law -- United States (1)
- Constitutional law/United States (1)
- Criminal Courts (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Publication
-
- UIC Law Review (8)
- West Virginia Law Review (7)
- Buffalo Law Review (5)
- BYU Law Review (3)
- Cleveland State Law Review (3)
-
- Kentucky Law Journal (3)
- Michigan Law Review (3)
- Florida State University Law Review (2)
- Indiana Law Journal (2)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (2)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (2)
- IUSTITIA (1)
- Loyola University Chicago Law Journal (1)
- Mercer Law Review (1)
- University of Richmond Law Review (1)
- Villanova Law Review (1)
- William & Mary Law Review (1)
Articles 31 - 46 of 46
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Diversionary Drug Problem Of The Cook County State's Attorney, 9 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 256 (1975), Leonard Tyrrell
The Diversionary Drug Problem Of The Cook County State's Attorney, 9 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 256 (1975), Leonard Tyrrell
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Use Of Jeopardy Assessments In Narcotics Enforcement, 9 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 262 (1975), John H. Anderson
The Use Of Jeopardy Assessments In Narcotics Enforcement, 9 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 262 (1975), John H. Anderson
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Post-Indictment Preliminary Hearings, 9 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 499 (1975), Douglas Lindsay
Post-Indictment Preliminary Hearings, 9 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 499 (1975), Douglas Lindsay
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Attica, Jury Pools And The Intent Requirement Of The Equal Protection Clause, Kenneth B. Forrest
Attica, Jury Pools And The Intent Requirement Of The Equal Protection Clause, Kenneth B. Forrest
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Revision Of Virginia's Criminal Code
Revision Of Virginia's Criminal Code
University of Richmond Law Review
On October 1, 1975 the criminal justice system of the Commonwealth of Virginia began to operate under revised codes of criminal law and procedure. Enacted during the last legislative session, Titles 18.2 and 19.2 contain an impressive array of new laws with which judges, lawyers, and law enforcement officers should quickly become familiar. In many instances, these new laws go far beyond recodification of existing laws. Several represent substantive changes which are quite controversial and remain hotly debated since the close of the legislative session.
Hearsay And Confrontation: Can The Criminal Defendant's Rights Be Preserved Under A Bifurcated Standard?
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Pretrial Discovery Of Government Informers In Federal Narcotics Cases: A Defense Tool, 9 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 221 (1975), Richard F. Walsh
Pretrial Discovery Of Government Informers In Federal Narcotics Cases: A Defense Tool, 9 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 221 (1975), Richard F. Walsh
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Representing Heroin Users: Sentencing And Other Issues, 9 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 178 (1975), Thomas D. Decker
Representing Heroin Users: Sentencing And Other Issues, 9 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 178 (1975), Thomas D. Decker
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Search Warrant - Practice And Procedure, 9 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 227 (1975), Alan M. Scarnavack
The Search Warrant - Practice And Procedure, 9 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 227 (1975), Alan M. Scarnavack
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Pretrial Preparation Of Minor Drug Cases, 9 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 235 (1975), Frank Wesolowski Jr.
Pretrial Preparation Of Minor Drug Cases, 9 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 235 (1975), Frank Wesolowski Jr.
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Federal Anti-Riot Act And Political Crime: The Need For Criminal Law Theory, Marvin Zalman
The Federal Anti-Riot Act And Political Crime: The Need For Criminal Law Theory, Marvin Zalman
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Effects Of Tucker On The Fruits Of Illegally Obtained Statements, Jeffery P. Reinhard
The Effects Of Tucker On The Fruits Of Illegally Obtained Statements, Jeffery P. Reinhard
Cleveland State Law Review
Although the Court has been careful to point out that illegally obtained statements are not admissible in the prosecution's case in chief, Michigan v. Tucker has done much to erode even that principle. In Tucker, the Court found admissible the testimony of a witness whose identity was learned solely on the basis of a statement obtained from the defendant in violation of the guidelines set forth in Miranda. Despite the Court's statement that it was significant that the interrogation preceded Miranda, and notwithstanding its reiteration of the principle that the defendant's statements would not have been admissible in the prosecution's …
Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings In Ohio: Due Process And The Hearsay Dilemma, Sara E. Strattan
Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings In Ohio: Due Process And The Hearsay Dilemma, Sara E. Strattan
Cleveland State Law Review
This comment will explore the extent to which the exclusion of hearsay evidence in a delinquency proceeding is a practical reality in the Ohio system. In so doing, the possibilities for abuse will be highlighted and suggestions for their elimination will be made, all in the spirit of the Supreme Court's mandate to provide fundamental due process safeguards to this procedure.
Juvenile Delinquent And Unruly Proceedings In Ohio: Unconstitutional Adjudications, Patricia Simia Kleri
Juvenile Delinquent And Unruly Proceedings In Ohio: Unconstitutional Adjudications, Patricia Simia Kleri
Cleveland State Law Review
This article will focus on the constitutional defects of juvenile court adjudications under Ohio juvenile law. The arguments presented, however, are equally applicable in other jurisdictions since every state has some type of legislation granting juvenile court jurisdiction over both criminals and noncriminal misconduct of children.
More On The New Federalism In Criminal Procedure, Donald E. Wilkes Jr.
More On The New Federalism In Criminal Procedure, Donald E. Wilkes Jr.
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Kentucky Law Survey: Criminal Procedure, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.
Kentucky Law Survey: Criminal Procedure, Rutheford B. Campbell Jr.
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.