Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (404)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (379)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (377)
- Columbia Law School (345)
- Illinois State University (334)
-
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (303)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (298)
- American University Washington College of Law (236)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (216)
- Georgetown University Law Center (208)
- Cornell University Law School (198)
- Brooklyn Law School (172)
- University of Michigan Law School (166)
- Pace University (156)
- University of Georgia School of Law (150)
- William & Mary Law School (146)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (143)
- Boston University School of Law (137)
- Roger Williams University (134)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (116)
- University of Colorado Law School (115)
- Duke Law (108)
- Singapore Management University (97)
- Florida State University College of Law (95)
- New York Law School (95)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (94)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (85)
- Fordham Law School (78)
- The Peter A. Allard School of Law (76)
- University of Kentucky (75)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal law (819)
- Criminal Law (366)
- Criminal justice (282)
- Death penalty (278)
- Criminal procedure (262)
-
- Sentencing (252)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (221)
- Capital punishment (202)
- Punishment (191)
- Evidence (185)
- Crime (172)
- Criminal (117)
- Race (115)
- Constitutional Law (110)
- Fourth Amendment (108)
- Criminal Procedure (102)
- Prosecutors (102)
- Police (96)
- Domestic violence (94)
- Rape (86)
- Eighth Amendment (84)
- Due process (80)
- Supreme Court (80)
- Sexual assault (78)
- Incarceration (77)
- International law (75)
- Sixth Amendment (75)
- Crimes (74)
- International Criminal Court (74)
- Terrorism (74)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (1178)
- All Faculty Scholarship (558)
- Faculty Publications (355)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (297)
- Articles (278)
-
- Scholarly Works (259)
- War Crimes Memoranda (259)
- Journal Articles (210)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (206)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (198)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (192)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (181)
- Publications (173)
- Scholarly Articles (153)
- Supreme Court Case Files (153)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (150)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (136)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (116)
- Faculty Articles (99)
- Scholarly Publications (95)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (83)
- All Faculty Publications (76)
- Articles & Chapters (73)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (68)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (66)
- Law Faculty Publications (65)
- California Agencies (61)
- Jesse Carter Opinions (58)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (58)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (57)
- File Type
Articles 7951 - 7980 of 8093
Full-Text Articles in Law
Caritativo V. Teets [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Caritativo V. Teets [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Writ of mandate would not issue to compel warden to institute proceedings to determine present sanity of defendant awaiting execution of death penalty after warden determined that there was not good reason to believe defendant was presently insane.
People V. Cole [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
People V. Cole [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Medical opinion as to whether the victim's wound could have been self-inflicted was admissible and sufficient evidence supported the verdict finding defendant guilty of first-degree murder.
People V. Merkouris, Jesse W. Carter
People V. Merkouris, Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Defendant was due a new trial for his ex-wife's murder because trial court erred by permitting him to withdraw not guilty by reason of insanity plea over counsel's implied objection and because instructions to jury on lying in wait were improper.
People V. Nunn [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
People V. Nunn [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
An osteopath's conviction for selling prescriptions for narcotics was proper because the regulatory code's use of the phrase "good faith" was not vague, and the prosecution's attempt to obtain narcotics from the osteopath was not entrapment.
People V. Rios [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
People V. Rios [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Defendant's arrest for the possession of heroin was lawful where the officer had reasonable cause to believe that defendant had committed a felony after defendant admitted that he had taken an injection of heroin two weeks before.
Willson V. Superior Court Of San Diego County [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Willson V. Superior Court Of San Diego County [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Although defendant's conduct observed by an officer did not of itself constitute reasonable cause to believe she was committing a felony, it was sufficient to justify the officer's reliance on information regarding defendant's bookmaking.
Hill V. Superior Court Of Humboldt County [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Hill V. Superior Court Of Humboldt County [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Court-appointed attorneys who defended an indigent client charged with murder were not entitled to a writ compelling compensation of more than $ 1,000, where the payment was comparable to other jurisdictions and to that received by public employees.
People V. Morlock, Jesse W. Carter
People V. Morlock, Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
A specific intent to steal was an essential element of the crime of robbery, as distinguished from the crime of burglary, where the crime was complete when the accused had entered the house of another with intent to commit any felony.
People V. Malotte [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
People V. Malotte [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Where defendant discussed with police officers in a secretly taped conversation the commission of a crime, namely, provision of prostitutes, there was no unreasonable invasion of privacy when the conversation was used against her.
Responsibility And Law: In Defense Of The Mcnaghten Rules, Jerome Hall
Responsibility And Law: In Defense Of The Mcnaghten Rules, Jerome Hall
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Psychiatry And Criminal Responsibility, Jerome Hall
Psychiatry And Criminal Responsibility, Jerome Hall
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
People V. Penny, Jesse W. Carter
People V. Penny, Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
A conviction for involuntary manslaughter was reversed because the jury was erroneously instructed on a civil standard of negligence rather than criminal negligence and the lack of due caution and circumspection.
People V. Jackson [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
People V. Jackson [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Injuries to kidnapping victim, who had been allowed to exercise, eat, smoke, read, shave, bathe, and use a toothbrush, were trivial and thus, were not the type of injuries the legislature contemplated in providing the death penalty for kidnapping.
People V. Cavanaugh [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
People V. Cavanaugh [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
There was no error that was ground for reversal in a defendant's conviction for first-degree murder despite the prosecution's admission of other crimes allegedly admitted by the defendant and inflammatory photographs.
Bompensiero V. Superior Court Of San Diego County [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Bompensiero V. Superior Court Of San Diego County [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Defendant was properly indicted for participating in acceptance of bribes by a public official when granting a liquor license, the superior court acted properly so the judge was not disqualified, and the statute of limitations did not bar charges.
1955-1976 Rowan County (Ky.) Circuit Court Replevin Bonds Ledger, Rowan County (Ky.) Circuit Court
1955-1976 Rowan County (Ky.) Circuit Court Replevin Bonds Ledger, Rowan County (Ky.) Circuit Court
Rowan County Circuit Court Ledgers
The Replevin Bonds ledger of the Rowan County (KY.) Circuit Court from November 1955 to January 1976.
People V. Robinson [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
People V. Robinson [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Where there was prima facie proof of the existence of a conspiracy, testimony concerning a co-conspirator's statements in furtherance of the conspiracy, though made in the absence of defendant, was admissible as an exception to the hearsay rule.
Hayashi V. Lorenz [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Hayashi V. Lorenz [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Plaintiffs failed to show any abuse of discretion by the trial court in dismissing their action for want of prosecution.
People V. Wolfe, Jesse W. Carter
People V. Wolfe, Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Remarks of the prosecuting attorney were not prejudicial to defendants because of the overwhelming evidence of defendants' guilt. A manslaughter instruction would have been improper because evidence supported first-degree murder or self-defense.
Revision Of Criminal Law -- Objectives And Methods, Jerome Hall
Revision Of Criminal Law -- Objectives And Methods, Jerome Hall
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
1954-1955 Rowan County (Ky.) Circuit Court Replevin Bonds Ledger, Rowan County (Ky.) Circuit Court
1954-1955 Rowan County (Ky.) Circuit Court Replevin Bonds Ledger, Rowan County (Ky.) Circuit Court
Rowan County Circuit Court Ledgers
The Replevin Bonds ledger of the Rowan County (KY.) Circuit Court from October 1954 to December 1955.
Mccracken V. Teets [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Mccracken V. Teets [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
A trial court's refusal to issue a writ of mandate to compel a warden to inquire into the sanity of a prisoner under a death sentence did not have to be set aside on the basis of a misapprehension of the warden's duty or lack of express findings.
People V. Thomas [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
People V. Thomas [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Instruction on lying in wait did not require a showing of intent to fix the degree and instruction distinguishing first and second degree murder in addition to the lying in wait instruction was sufficient.
People V. Haeussler [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
People V. Haeussler [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
At trial on charges of manslaughter and driving a vehicle under the influence of intoxicating liquor, admission of testimony concerning the results of a blood test taken without defendant's consent did not deprive her of due process of law.
People V. Daugherty, Jesse W. Carter
People V. Daugherty, Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
First-degree murder conviction was upheld when the intent to torture was established and the jury dismissed the insanity defense when the defendant failed to establish his insanity by a preponderance of the evidence.
In Re Kelleher [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
In Re Kelleher [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
It was unlawful for two labor unions that were involved in a controversy as to which one should represent the employees to picket outside of the employer, so the picketers were lawfully arrested and their writs of habeas corpus were denied.
People V. Costa [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
People V. Costa [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
A deceased passenger's statement that defendant caused an automobile accident was admissible in defendant's trial for manslaughter as a spontaneous declaration.
People V. Evans, Jesse W. Carter
People V. Evans, Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
A new trial was ordered following a conviction for lewd conduct with a child. It was not in accord with principles of justice and fair play to show the child defendant's picture and then take her into a room where defendant was the only occupant.
Green V. Gordon [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Green V. Gordon [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Commutation of sentence was in nature of a favor and could be granted upon conditions. Therefore, it was within governor's power to commute death sentence to life without parole even though no such statutory penalty existed for murder conviction.
People V. Gilliam [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
People V. Gilliam [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Defendant's conviction of first degree murder and sentence of the death penalty were proper because there was no provocation for his conduct, and the circumstances showed an abandoned and malignant heart together with a consciousness of guilt.