Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Golden Gate University School of Law (52)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (12)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (10)
- Columbia Law School (10)
- Georgetown University Law Center (8)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (4)
- Cornell University Law School (4)
- Pace University (4)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (4)
- William & Mary Law School (4)
- Brooklyn Law School (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (3)
- University of Georgia School of Law (3)
- University of Miami Law School (3)
- University of Missouri School of Law (3)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3)
- Boston University School of Law (2)
- Duke Law (2)
- Florida State University College of Law (2)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (2)
- UIC School of Law (2)
- University of Kentucky (2)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (2)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (2)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- Wayne State University (2)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- DePaul University (1)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Death penalty (15)
- Juvenile offenders (12)
- Criminal law (11)
- Juvenile delinquents (11)
- Capital punishment (9)
-
- Criminal Law (6)
- Jurisprudence (5)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (4)
- Death sentence (4)
- Extradition (4)
- International Criminal Court (4)
- Juveniles and firearms (4)
- Punishment (4)
- Constitutional Law (3)
- Crime (3)
- Crime statistics (3)
- Domestic violence (3)
- Legal Philosophy (3)
- Legal ethics (3)
- Public defenders (3)
- At-risk youth (2)
- CJP (2)
- California Law Review (2)
- Capital Jury Project (2)
- Capital Punishment (2)
- Capital jurors (2)
- Capital offense (2)
- Criminal code (2)
- Criminal justice (2)
- Culpability (2)
- Publication
-
- Juvenile Justice Bulletin (29)
- Faculty Scholarship (22)
- All Faculty Scholarship (15)
- Faculty Publications (10)
- National Institute of Justice Research in Brief (9)
-
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (7)
- War Crimes Memoranda (7)
- National Institute of Justice Office of Justice Programs (6)
- Articles (5)
- California Agencies (5)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (4)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (4)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (4)
- Journal Articles (4)
- Scholarly Works (4)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (3)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (3)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (2)
- Faculty Works (2)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (2)
- Publications (2)
- Scholarly Publications (2)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Book Reviews (1)
- California Assembly (1)
- College of Law Faculty (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (1)
- Faculty Publications & Other Works (1)
- LLM Theses and Essays (1)
Articles 151 - 170 of 170
Full-Text Articles in Law
Reconciling Amnesties With Universal Jurisdiction, Juan E. Mendez, Garth Meintjes
Reconciling Amnesties With Universal Jurisdiction, Juan E. Mendez, Garth Meintjes
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.
The Bill Of Rights And The Constitution: Facing The Challenge Of The Future, Stephen Wermiel
The Bill Of Rights And The Constitution: Facing The Challenge Of The Future, Stephen Wermiel
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.
An End To Insanity: Recasting The Role Of Mental Disability In Criminal Cases, Christopher Slobogin
An End To Insanity: Recasting The Role Of Mental Disability In Criminal Cases, Christopher Slobogin
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
This article argues that mental illness should no longer be the basis for a special defense of insanity. Instead, mental disorder should be considered in criminal cases only if relevant to other excuse doctrines, such as lack of mens rea, self-defense and duress, as those defenses have been defined under modern subjectively-oriented codes. With the advent of these subjectively defined doctrines (a development which, ironically, took place during the same period that insanity formulations expanded), the insanity defense has outlived its usefulness, normatively and practically. Modern official formulations of the defense are overbroad because, fairly construed, they exculpate the vast …
Defending The Innocent, Abbe Smith
Defending The Innocent, Abbe Smith
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Of the legal scholarship examining the representation of the innocent accused, most has to do with guilty pleas, not trial or post-trial advocacy. Most of this literature is concerned with the pressure put on innocent defendants to plead guilty in order to receive a more lenient sentence than what they would get if found guilty at trial. This problem is compounded by the inability of poor defendants to make bail. Unfortunately, there are other, equally insidious ways to pressure innocent defendants to plead guilty. When addressing the question of defending the innocent at trial or in a post-conviction challenge, most …
Foreword: Is Justice Just Us?, Christopher Slobogin
Foreword: Is Justice Just Us?, Christopher Slobogin
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
This is a review of JUSTICE, LIABILITY AND BLAME, by Paul Robinson and John Darley. The book is a summary of 18 studies which surveyed lay subjects about their attitudes toward various aspects of criminal law doctrine, including the act requirement for attempt, omission liability, accomplice liability, the felony-murder role, and the intoxication and insanity defenses. In virtually every study, the authors found that the subjects disagreed with the Model Penal Code's position, the common law's position, or both. The authors contend that results of surveys such as theirs should play a significant role in designing criminal doctrine, both because …
Ensuring Able Representation For Publicly-Funded Criminal Defendants: Lessons From England, Peter W. Tague
Ensuring Able Representation For Publicly-Funded Criminal Defendants: Lessons From England, Peter W. Tague
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
While there are skilled private defense lawyers who enthusiastically represent indigent criminal defendants, too often defense lawyers whose income depends upon appointments provide deplorable representation. The problem is well known and pervasive. In addition to the blizzard of claims on appeal of ineffective representation, defenders' efforts have been savaged by judges and by fellow lawyers. These nagging problems persist: to induce private lawyers to represent their clients effectively by eliciting the defendant's story and managing their relationship in a way that at least does not displease the defendant; investigating his and the prosecution's positions; pressing the prosecution for discovery, for …
Race, Class And Criminal Prosecutions: The Supreme Court’S Role In Targeting Minorities, David Cole
Race, Class And Criminal Prosecutions: The Supreme Court’S Role In Targeting Minorities, David Cole
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
In No Equal Justice, I examine the ways in which race and class disparities have an effect at each stage of the criminal justice system. Much of the disparity concerns discriminatory police practices. My argument is that the Supreme Court, and our society, have constructed a set of rules that virtually ensure there will be racially disparate prosecution of the criminal law by the police. The way the Court has done that, I suggest, is by creating pockets of discretion that police can use without having to identify any objective, individualized basis for suspicion. When the police are free to …
Economic Incentives In Representing Publicly-Funded Criminal Defendants In England's Crown Court, Peter W. Tague
Economic Incentives In Representing Publicly-Funded Criminal Defendants In England's Crown Court, Peter W. Tague
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The flux now engulfing the way in which the defenders of indigent criminal defendants are compensated in England's Crown Court provides a sober lesson for U.S. lawyers. Once, U.S. lawyers, who themselves are appointed to represent indigent defendants, could have cited English practice to support a hefty increase in the meager compensation they receive in many jurisdictions. For in balancing the tension between encouraging effective representation, but at bearable social cost, U.S. jurisdictions stress the latter, all but ignoring the former. The English approach, by contrast, has paid generously, at least in serious cases, thereby implicitly recognizing that defenders could …
Defending Defending: The Case For Unmitigated Zeal On Behalf Of People Who Do Terrible Things, Abbe Smith
Defending Defending: The Case For Unmitigated Zeal On Behalf Of People Who Do Terrible Things, Abbe Smith
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Although defending defending may be an endless pursuit, I cannot help taking it on. I am, after all, a defender myself, and defending fellow defenders seems to go with the territory. Of course, attacks on criminal defenders do not come out of nowhere - difficult and complex questions often arise in criminal defense work. Unfortunately, the questions that are raised in the aftermath of a high profile case such as the Abner Louima case are usually the easy ones - questions that have more to do with the nature of the adversarial system than with the values or ethics of …
Evidence Issues In Domestic Violence Civil Cases, Jane H. Aiken, Jane C. Murphy
Evidence Issues In Domestic Violence Civil Cases, Jane H. Aiken, Jane C. Murphy
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
This article is intended to assist practitioners in anticipating and responding to some of the evidentiary challenges in civil cases in which relief is sought for the victims of domestic violence. First, expert testimony is often necessary to dispel common myths about battered women and to educate judges and juries about the dynamics of domestic violence. Recent case law, however, has limited the admissibility of "non-scientific" expert testimony and may make it difficult for practitioners to use experts in their cases. In addition, particular evidentiary issues arise when victims are pursuing both criminal and civil remedies against the batterer. This …
Drug Treatment Courts And Emergent Experimentalist Government, Michael C. Dorf, Charles F. Sabel
Drug Treatment Courts And Emergent Experimentalist Government, Michael C. Dorf, Charles F. Sabel
Faculty Scholarship
Despite the continuing "war on drugs," the last decade has witnessed the creation and nationwide spread of a remarkable set of institutions, drug treatment courts. In drug treatment court, a criminal defendant pleads guilty or otherwise accepts responsibility for a charged offense and accepts placement in a court-mandated program of drug treatment. The judge and court personnel closely monitor the defendant's performance in the program and the program's capacity to serve the mandated client. The federal government and national associations in turn monitor the local drug treatment courts and disseminate successful practices. The ensemble of institutions, monitoring, and pooling exemplifies …
The "Normal" Successes And Failures Of Feminism And The Criminal Law, Victoria Nourse
The "Normal" Successes And Failures Of Feminism And The Criminal Law, Victoria Nourse
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
To write of feminist reform in the criminal law is to write of simultaneous success and failure. We have seen marked changes in the doctrines and the practice of rape law, domestic violence law, and the law of self-defense. There is not a criminal law casebook in America today, nor a state statute book, that does not tell this story. Yet for all of this success, we also live in a world in which reform seems to suffer routine failures. Many believe, for example, that feminist reforms have rid rape law of the resistance requirement; however, recent scholarship makes it …
Of Prosecutors And Special Prosecutors: An Organizational Perspective, H. Geoffrey Moulton Jr., Daniel Richman
Of Prosecutors And Special Prosecutors: An Organizational Perspective, H. Geoffrey Moulton Jr., Daniel Richman
Faculty Scholarship
The Independent Counsel (IC) statute, designed to restore public trust in the impartial administration of criminal justice after Watergate, ultimately fueled rather than quieted the perception that partisan politics drives the investigation of high-ranking government officials. Congress, in an inspiring display of bipartisanship, bid it a muted farewell. The statute's fate was sealed by the enormous controversy surrounding the investigation conducted by Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr.
Although Start did not bring criminal charges against President Clinton, his office went pretty far in that direction, committing considerable enforcement resources to that end, bringing criminal charges against people believed to have information …
Capital Attrition: Error Rates In Capital Cases, 1973-1995, James S. Liebman, Jeffery Fagan, Valerie West, Jonathan Lloyd
Capital Attrition: Error Rates In Capital Cases, 1973-1995, James S. Liebman, Jeffery Fagan, Valerie West, Jonathan Lloyd
Faculty Scholarship
Americans seem to be of two minds about the death penalty. In the last several years, the overall number of executions has risen steeply, reaching a fifty year high this year. Although two-thirds of the public support the penalty, this figure represents a sharp decline from the four-fifths of the population that endorsed the death penalty only six years ago, leaving support for capital punishment at a twenty year low. When life without parole is offered as an alternative, support for the penalty drops even more – often below a majority. Grants of executive clemency reached a twenty year high …
The Nature And Function Of Criminal Theory, George P. Fletcher
The Nature And Function Of Criminal Theory, George P. Fletcher
Faculty Scholarship
The practice of teaching and writing in the field of criminal law has changed dramatically in the last half-century. In the United States and England, and to a lesser extent in other English-speaking countries, we have witnessed a turn toward theoretical inquires of a greater depth and variety than had existed previously in the history of Anglo-American law. The subjects of this new literature include the nature and rationale of punishment; the theory of justification and of excuse, that is, of wrongdoing and responsibility; the relevance of consequences to the gravity of offenses (the problem of moral luck); and the …
After The "Social Meaning Turn": Implications For Research Design And Methods Of Proof In Contemporary Criminal Law Policy Analysis, Bernard E. Harcourt
After The "Social Meaning Turn": Implications For Research Design And Methods Of Proof In Contemporary Criminal Law Policy Analysis, Bernard E. Harcourt
Faculty Scholarship
The social norm movement in criminal justice has received a lot of attention in academic and public policy circles. This essay critically examines social norm writings and explores some of the implications for methods of proof and research design in the social sciences. In the process, the essay offers an alternative theoretical approach. This alternative focuses on the multiple ways in which the social meaning of practices (such as juvenile gun possession, gang membership, or disorderly conduct) and the social meaning of policing techniques (such as juvenile snitching policies, youth curfews, or order-maintenance policing) may shape us as contemporary subjects …
The Overproduction Of Death, James S. Liebman
The Overproduction Of Death, James S. Liebman
Faculty Scholarship
In this Article, Professor Liebman concludes that trial actors have strong incentives to – and do – overproduce death sentences, condemning to death men and women who, under state substantive law, do not deserve that penalty. Because trial-level procedural rights do not weaken these incentives or constrain the overproduction that results, it falls to post-trial procedural review – which is ill-suited to the task and fails to feed back needed information to the trial level – to identify the many substantive mistakes made at capital trials. This system is difficult to reform because it benefits both pro-death penalty trial actors …
Death Is The Whole Ball Game, Jeffrey A. Fagan, James S. Liebman, Valerie West
Death Is The Whole Ball Game, Jeffrey A. Fagan, James S. Liebman, Valerie West
Faculty Scholarship
In Capital Appeals Revisited and The Meaning of Capital Appeals, Barry Latzer and James N.G. Cauthen argue that a study of capital appeals should focus only on overturned findings of guilt, and complain that in A Broken System we examine all overturned capital verdicts. But the question they want studied cannot provide an accurate evaluation of a system of capital punishment. By proposing to count only "conviction" error and not "sentence" error, Latzer and Cauthen ignore that if a death sentence is overturned, the case is no longer capital and the system of capital punishment has failed to achieve its …
Dignity And Victimhood, Kent Greenawalt
Dignity And Victimhood, Kent Greenawalt
Faculty Scholarship
If Sandy Kadish has reminded us of limitations of consequentialist approaches to the criminal law and has proposed persuasive resolutions of issues that deontological perspectives reveal, Meir Dan-Cohen has jarred us to rethink fundamental premises about rules in the criminal justice system. His Essay is an example of his ingenuity for unsettling understandings. The Essay reads easily and seems deceptively straightforward, but it is rich in nuance and its themes are complex. This Response identifies the various themes and evaluates their plausibility. I take Professor Dan-Cohen's Essay as a preliminary exploration of a major subject, and I have responded accordingly, …
Death Matters – A Reply To Latzer And Cauthen, James S. Liebman, Jeffrey A. Fagan, Valerie West
Death Matters – A Reply To Latzer And Cauthen, James S. Liebman, Jeffrey A. Fagan, Valerie West
Faculty Scholarship
The legal treatment of capital punishment in the United States "rests squarely on the predicate that the penalty of death is qualitatively different from a sentence of imprisonment, however long. Death, in its finality, differs more from life imprisonment than a 100-year prison term differs from one of only a year or two. This predicate is among "the evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society" and determine whether a punishment is "cruel and unusual" in violation of the Constitution. Because "'[f]rom the point of view of the defendant, [death] is different in both its severity …