Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (22)
- Cornell University Law School (14)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (14)
- Columbia Law School (11)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (11)
-
- Georgetown University Law Center (9)
- Brooklyn Law School (7)
- Duke Law (7)
- Pace University (7)
- American University Washington College of Law (6)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (6)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (5)
- The Peter A. Allard School of Law (5)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (5)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (5)
- William & Mary Law School (5)
- Singapore Management University (4)
- University of Georgia School of Law (4)
- BLR (3)
- Boston University School of Law (3)
- Fordham Law School (3)
- Penn State Law (3)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (3)
- Southern Methodist University (3)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (3)
- University of Kentucky (3)
- University of Michigan Law School (3)
- Boise State University (2)
- City University of New York (CUNY) (2)
- Florida State University College of Law (2)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal Law and Procedure (16)
- Criminal law (12)
- Criminal Law (11)
- Death penalty (10)
- Capital punishment (9)
-
- Criminal procedure (8)
- Criminal justice (6)
- Famous Trials (6)
- International Law (6)
- Trial (6)
- Evidence (5)
- Punishment (5)
- Race (5)
- Civil Rights (4)
- Civil rights (4)
- Constitutional Law (4)
- Crime (4)
- Criminal liability (4)
- Genocide (4)
- Racial profiling (4)
- Rule of law (4)
- Blame (3)
- Capital Punishment (3)
- Criminal defense (3)
- Eighth Amendment (3)
- Future dangerousness (3)
- International criminal law (3)
- Law and Society (3)
- Mens rea (3)
- Plea bargaining (3)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (42)
- War Crimes Memoranda (20)
- All Faculty Scholarship (19)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (13)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (11)
-
- Journal Articles (10)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (8)
- Articles (7)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (7)
- Faculty Publications (6)
- Faculty Works (6)
- All Faculty Publications (5)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (5)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (5)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (5)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (4)
- Scholarly Works (4)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (3)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (3)
- Popular Media (3)
- Publications (3)
- Rutgers Law School (Newark) Faculty Papers (3)
- Articles & Chapters (2)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (2)
- Criminal Justice Faculty Publications and Presentations (2)
- Faculty Law Review Articles (2)
- Faculty Scholarly Works (2)
- Publications and Research (2)
- Scholarly Publications (2)
- Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship (2)
Articles 211 - 224 of 224
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Origins Of Shared Intuitions Of Justice, Owen D. Jones, Paul H. Robinson, Robert Kurzban
The Origins Of Shared Intuitions Of Justice, Owen D. Jones, Paul H. Robinson, Robert Kurzban
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
Contrary to the common wisdom among criminal law scholars, empirical evidence reveals that people's intuitions of justice are often specific, nuanced, and widely shared. Indeed, with regard to the core harms and evils to which criminal law addresses itself-physical aggression, takings without consent, and deception in transactions-the shared intuitions are stunningly consistent across cultures as well as demographics. It is puzzling that judgments of moral blameworthiness, which seem so complex and subjective, reflect such a remarkable consensus. What could explain this striking result?
The authors theorize that one explanation may be an evolved predisposition toward these shared intuitions of justice, …
Cunningham V. California - Case Comment, Rebecca Haw Allensworth
Cunningham V. California - Case Comment, Rebecca Haw Allensworth
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
Sixth Amendment--Allocation of Fact-finding in Sentencing.--Apprendi v. New Jersey spawned a series of Supreme Court sentencing decisions which, when viewed together, are at best confusing and at worst contradictory. Commentators and courts have struggled to find a coherent governing principle uniting "Apprendi," "Blakely v. Washington," and "United States v. Booker." The holding in "Apprendi," originally described as a bright-line rule, has proved anything but. Last Term, in "Cunningham v. California," the Court added another chapter to the Apprendi saga when it declared unconstitutional California's Determinate Sentencing Law (DSL). Justice Ginsburg authored the majority opinion that overturned the California Supreme Court's …
An Internet-Based Mental Disability Law Program: Implications For Social Change In Nations With Developing Economies, Michael L. Perlin
An Internet-Based Mental Disability Law Program: Implications For Social Change In Nations With Developing Economies, Michael L. Perlin
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
Building Criminal Capital Behind Bars: Peer Effects In Juvenile Corrections, Patrick J. Bayer, Randi Hjalmarsson, David Pozen
Building Criminal Capital Behind Bars: Peer Effects In Juvenile Corrections, Patrick J. Bayer, Randi Hjalmarsson, David Pozen
Faculty Scholarship
This paper analyzes the influence that juvenile offenders serving time in the same correctional facility have on each other's subsequent criminal behavior. The analysis is based on data on over 8,000 individuals serving time in 169 juvenile correctional facilities during a two-year period in Florida. These data provide a complete record of past crimes, facility assignments, and arrests and adjudications in the year following release for each individual. To control for the non-random assignment to facilities, we include facility and facility-by-prior offense fixed effects, thereby estimating peer effects using only within-facility variation over time. We find strong evidence of peer …
Why Not A Miranda For Searches?, Gerard E. Lynch
Why Not A Miranda For Searches?, Gerard E. Lynch
Faculty Scholarship
I am delighted to be here today.
I am delighted to be at The Ohio State University, which has not only built a truly extraordinary criminal law and procedure faculty, including Professor Joshua Dressler, Alan Michaels, Sharon Davies, and Douglas Berman, but has also accumulated a large number of alumni of my home institution, Columbia Law School, including my former students, Professor Edward Foley and the aforesaid Professors Davies and Michaels, as well as Professor Deborah Jones Merritt, who is quite literally a daughter of Columbia, where her father is a distinguished emeritus member of the faculty, my esteemed senior …
Pope John Paul Ii, Vatican Ii, And Capital Punishment, Howard Bromberg
Pope John Paul Ii, Vatican Ii, And Capital Punishment, Howard Bromberg
Articles
Part I of this Article describe s Pope John Paul II’s teaching on capital punishment as based on the Scriptures and expressed in Evangelium Vitae and the Catechism. Part II examines the authority with which this doctrine was issued. Part III suggests that this teaching represents the “traditional teaching of the Church,” although a “more perfect expression” of that teaching than has heretofore been recognized. Parts IV and V indicate why the papacy of John Paul II-—“this time, in which God in His hidden design has entrusted to me... very close to the year 2000”-—was ripe for this explicit articulation …
A Reader's Companion To Against Prediction: A Reply To Ariela Gross, Yoram Margalioth, And Yoav Sapir On Economic Modeling, Selective Incapacitation, Governmentality, And Race, Bernard E. Harcourt
A Reader's Companion To Against Prediction: A Reply To Ariela Gross, Yoram Margalioth, And Yoav Sapir On Economic Modeling, Selective Incapacitation, Governmentality, And Race, Bernard E. Harcourt
Faculty Scholarship
From parole prediction instruments and violent sexual predator scores to racial profiling on the highways, instruments to predict future dangerousness, drug-courier profiles, and IRS computer algorithms to detect tax evaders, the rise of actuarial methods in the field of crime and punishment presents a number of challenging issues at the intersection of economic theory, sociology, history, race studies, criminology, social theory, and law. The three review essays of "Against Prediction" by Ariela Gross, Yoram Margalioth, and Yoav Sapir, raise these challenges in their very best light. Ranging from the heights of poststructuralist and critical race theory to the intricate details …
Restorative Justice: What Is It And Does It Work?, Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Restorative Justice: What Is It And Does It Work?, Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
This article reviews the now extensive literature on the varied arenas in which restorative justice is theorized and practiced — criminal violations, community ruptures and disputes, civil wars, regime change, human rights violations, and international law. It also reviews — by examining empirical studies of the processes in different settings — how restorative justice has been criticized, what its limitations and achievements might be, and how it might be understood. I explore the foundational concepts of reintegrative shaming, acknowledgment and responsibility, restitution, truth and reconciliation, and sentencing or healing circles for their transformative and theoretical potentials and for their actual …
Defending The Right Of Self-Representation: An Empirical Look At The Pro Se Felony Defendant, Erica J. Hashimoto
Defending The Right Of Self-Representation: An Empirical Look At The Pro Se Felony Defendant, Erica J. Hashimoto
Scholarly Works
Why would a criminal defendant waive the right to counsel and proceed pro se? Conventional wisdom assumes that there is no good reason for a defendant to choose self-representation, and those who make that choice are therefore either mentally ill or foolish. Courtroom proceedings in cases of high-profile pro se defendants like Colin Ferguson and, more recently, Zacarias Moussaoui and John Muhammad, have only increased the dominance of this prevailing view. Even the Supreme Court has assumed that the right of self-representation in practice hurts, rather than helps, criminal defendants. Until now, however, no empirical study has examined the phenomenon …
Poetic (In)Justice? Rap Music Lyrics As Art, Life, And Criminal Evidence, Andrea L. Dennis
Poetic (In)Justice? Rap Music Lyrics As Art, Life, And Criminal Evidence, Andrea L. Dennis
Scholarly Works
Courts routinely admit defendant-authored rap music lyrics as substantive evidence in the adjudication of criminal cases. In doing so, courts fail to recognize that rap music lyrics are art. Rather, judges view the interpretation of rap music lyrics as a subject of common knowledge, interpret the defendant's lyrics literally, and characterize lyrics as autobiographical depictions of actual events. In making admissibility decisions, courts must give consideration to the social constraints and artistic conventions impacting the composition and interpretation of rap music lyrics. More particularly, they must understand the commercialized nature of the rap music industry, artist claims of authenticity, and …
The Perils Of Evidentiary Manipulation, Edward K. Cheng
The Perils Of Evidentiary Manipulation, Edward K. Cheng
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
The use of evidentiary rules to achieve substantive goals strikes me as a Faustian bargain, and, given Bierschbach and Stein's acknowledgedly tentative position, I hope to dissuade them of the virtues of the practice. My goal therefore is to explore briefly the potential dark side of specialized evidentiary rules. The concerns of injecting substantive goals into evidence law extend far beyond the narrow legitimacy concerns Bierschbach and Stein raise. It is not simply the question of whether we aspire to a pluralistic or majority-take-all democratic society. Rather, evidentiary manipulation threatens the legitimacy of criminal and evidence law... Bierschbach and Stein's …
Regulating Settlement: What Is Left Of The Rule Of Law In The Criminal Process?, Nancy J. King
Regulating Settlement: What Is Left Of The Rule Of Law In The Criminal Process?, Nancy J. King
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
Consider what plea bargains would be like if legal rules were taken more seriously than they currently are. A court would recognize a defendant's willingness to be convicted of an offense only when certain conditions were met: (1) the defendant actually committed the crime; (2) the defendant was punished with the penalty authorized by law for that crime; (3) all government actors involved in the investigation, prosecution, defense, and adjudication of the case had complied with the law governing the criminal process; and (4) the settlement agreement did not relieve any of them of the duty to comply with the …
Guilty Pleas And Barristers' Incentives: Lessons From England, Peter W. Tague
Guilty Pleas And Barristers' Incentives: Lessons From England, Peter W. Tague
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
When considering the defendant's plea, barristers, like lawyers, have two overriding, selfish interests: maximizing remuneration and avoiding sanction. The tension between defendant and defender is most acute when the defendant is indigent and the defender has been chosen to represent him. It is their relationship that is addressed in this article.
The goal is to align the defender's selfish interests with the defendant's need for thoughtful advice over how to plead, so that, behind the guise of apparently disinterested advice, the advocate is not pursuing his interests at the defendant's expense. By contrast to most American practice, the method of …
The Lawyer's "Conscience" And The Limits Of Persuasion, Abbe Smith
The Lawyer's "Conscience" And The Limits Of Persuasion, Abbe Smith
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
As all practicing lawyers know, interviewing and counseling are at the heart of legal representation. This is what lawyers do, even criminal trial lawyers: we talk with and advise clients. Sometimes, after considering the government’s case and available defenses, we advise clients to go to trial. More often, we advise them to take a plea.
In counseling our clients we can be as “client-centered” as the next lawyer, graciously acceding to our clients’ wishes. This is especially so when the client is making what we regard to be a reasonable choice. But clients are not always reasonable. Sometimes they are …