Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (50)
- American University Washington College of Law (23)
- University of Michigan Law School (17)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (15)
- University of Richmond (10)
-
- UIC School of Law (7)
- Brigham Young University Law School (5)
- Mercer University School of Law (5)
- Notre Dame Law School (5)
- University of the District of Columbia School of Law (5)
- Florida International University College of Law (4)
- New York Law School (4)
- Seattle University School of Law (4)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (3)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (3)
- University of Colorado Law School (3)
- University of Georgia School of Law (3)
- Brooklyn Law School (2)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (2)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (2)
- UC Law SF (2)
- University of Missouri School of Law (2)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (2)
- Chapman University (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court (43)
- New York (41)
- Federal (36)
- 1994) (35)
- Constitutions (33)
-
- Appellate Division (17)
- Defendant (13)
- § 6 (13)
- L. Ralph Mecham (12)
- Jury (11)
- Violated (11)
- § 1 (11)
- Federal courts (9)
- Capital Jury Project (8)
- Courts (8)
- Equal protection (8)
- First Amendment (7)
- N.Y. Constitutional Art. I (7)
- Second Department (7)
- U.S. Constitutional amendment XIV (7)
- United States Supreme Court (7)
- § II (7)
- Capital punishment (6)
- Constitutional (6)
- Due process (6)
- N.Y. Constitutional Article I (6)
- Statutory (6)
- U.S. Constitutional amendment V (6)
- Unconstitutional (6)
- Violation (6)
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (50)
- American University Law Review (22)
- Indiana Law Journal (13)
- Faculty Scholarship (8)
- Law Faculty Publications (8)
-
- Articles (7)
- Faculty Publications (6)
- BYU Law Review (5)
- Journal Articles (5)
- Mercer Law Review (5)
- UIC Law Review (5)
- University of the District of Columbia Law Review (5)
- All Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Faculty Articles (4)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (4)
- Michigan Law Review (3)
- Publications (3)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (3)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (2)
- Circles: Buffalo Women's Journal of Law and Social Policy (2)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (2)
- Osgoode Hall Law Journal (2)
- Scholarly Works (2)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (2)
- University of Richmond Law Review (2)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (1)
- Bar Associations (1)
- Book Chapters (1)
- Book Reviews (1)
- California Regulatory Law Reporter (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 181 - 193 of 193
Full-Text Articles in Law
Defendant's Right To Be Present In New York: A "Constatutory" Right, Steven N. Malitz
Defendant's Right To Be Present In New York: A "Constatutory" Right, Steven N. Malitz
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel
Criminal Fault As Per The Lamer Court And The Ghost Of William Mcintyre, Michael J. Bryant
Criminal Fault As Per The Lamer Court And The Ghost Of William Mcintyre, Michael J. Bryant
Osgoode Hall Law Journal
Contrary to recent criticisms to the effect that the Supreme Court of Canada favours the rights of criminal defendants and shuns the interests of the community, the Lamer Court has in fact championed the moral requisites of the community in its constitutional jurisprudence on criminal fault. By viewing rights and responsibilities as inextricably linked, the Lamer Court implicitly borrows from natural law traditions espoused by the Dickson Court's most conspicuous dissenter on criminal fault issues-Mr. Justice William McIntyre. This article argues that the tradition or philosophy underlying criminal fault as per the Lamer Court contrasts with the individualist, rights-oriented tendency …
Justice, Liability, And Blame: Community Views And The Criminal Law, Paul H. Robinson, John M. Darley
Justice, Liability, And Blame: Community Views And The Criminal Law, Paul H. Robinson, John M. Darley
All Faculty Scholarship
This book reports empirical studies on 18 different areas of substantive criminal law in which the study results showing ordinary people’s judgments of justice are compared to the governing legal doctrine to highlight points of agreement and disagreement. The book also identifies trends and patterns in agreement and disagreement and discusses the implications for the formulation of criminal law. The chapters include:
Chapter 1. Community Views and the Criminal Law (Introduction; An Overview; Why Community Views Should Matter; Research Methods)
Chapter 2. Doctrines of Criminalization: What Conduct Should Be Criminal? (Objective Requirements of Attempt (Study 1); Creating a Criminal Risk …
The Federal Judicial Center And The Administration Of Justice In The Federal Courts, William W. Schwarzer
The Federal Judicial Center And The Administration Of Justice In The Federal Courts, William W. Schwarzer
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Romance Of Revenge: An Alternative History Of Jeffrey Dahmer's Trial, Samuel R. Gross
The Romance Of Revenge: An Alternative History Of Jeffrey Dahmer's Trial, Samuel R. Gross
Articles
On Feb. 17, 1992, Jeffrey Dahmer was sentenced to fifteen consecutive terms of life imprisonment for killing and dismembering fifteen young men and boys. Dahmer had been arrested six months earlier, on July 22, 1991. On Jan. 13 he pled guilty to the fifteen murder counts against him, leaving open only the issue of his sanity. Jury selection began two weeks later, and the trial proper started on Jan. 30. The jury heard two weeks of horrifying testimony about murder, mutilation and necrophilia; they deliberated for five hours before finding that Dahmer was sane when he committed thos crimes. After …
What's An Opinion For? (Special Issue: Judicial Opinion Writing), James Boyd White
What's An Opinion For? (Special Issue: Judicial Opinion Writing), James Boyd White
Articles
The question the papers in this Special Issue address is whether it matters how judicial opinions are written, and if so why. My hope here is to suggest a way of elaborating the question that may provide the reader with a useful point of departure for reading the more extensive papers that follow.
Political Correctness In Jury Selection, George P. Fletcher
Political Correctness In Jury Selection, George P. Fletcher
Faculty Scholarship
The values of equality and freedom are in constant tension, or so some think. The more society stresses equality, the less freedom people have. For example, Bruce Ackerman would abolish inheritance in his utopian society to insure that every generation begins on an equal footing. Many commentators have advocated restrictions on pornography and hate speech in order to protect the likely targets of these traditionally protected uses of free speech. Additionally, Catharine MacKinnon has invoked the principle of equality in the form of protecting disempowered minorities to argue for a restriction on liberty and freedom. Conversely, the more economic freedom …
Arbitrariedad, Horacio M. Lynch