Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (23)
- University of Michigan Law School (11)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (8)
- William & Mary Law School (7)
- Brigham Young University Law School (6)
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (5)
- Seattle University School of Law (3)
- University of the District of Columbia School of Law (2)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- North Carolina Central University School of Law (1)
- UIC School of Law (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (1)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- University of Tennessee College of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Unpublished opinions (6)
- Citing unpublished opinions (3)
- Judicial Selection (3)
- Judicial Selection Methods (3)
- Judicial review (3)
-
- United States Supreme Court (3)
- 2000 Presidential Election (2)
- Common law (2)
- Effectiveness (2)
- Fifth Circuit (2)
- Judicial Candidates (2)
- Judiciary (2)
- Juries (2)
- Model Penal Code (2)
- Patent infringement (2)
- Separation of powers (2)
- Treaties (2)
- United States Congress and Senate Committee on the Judiciary (2)
- Unpublished decisions (2)
- Unpublished opinions and precedent (2)
- Accountability (1)
- Admissibility (1)
- Adverse Expert Witness (1)
- American Bar Association (1)
- Appellate defense (1)
- Appellate judge (1)
- Armed conflicts (1)
- Attorney Discipline (1)
- Availability of unpublished decisions (1)
- Bias (1)
- Publication
-
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (22)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (8)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (6)
- Indiana Law Journal (5)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (5)
-
- BYU Law Review (4)
- Michigan Law Review (3)
- Seattle University Law Review (3)
- University of the District of Columbia Law Review (2)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (2)
- American Indian Law Review (1)
- Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal (1)
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (1)
- Human Rights Brief (1)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (1)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (1)
- Nevada Law Journal (1)
- North Carolina Central Law Review (1)
- Tennessee Law Review (1)
- UIC Law Review (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (1)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (1)
- University of Richmond Law Review (1)
- William & Mary Law Review (1)
Articles 61 - 74 of 74
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Exhausted Doctrine, Letitia Ness
The Post-Conflict Transitional Administration Of Kosovo And The Lessons-Learned In Efforts To Establish A Judiciary And Rule Of Law, Wendy S. Betts, Scott N. Carlson, Gregory Grisvold
The Post-Conflict Transitional Administration Of Kosovo And The Lessons-Learned In Efforts To Establish A Judiciary And Rule Of Law, Wendy S. Betts, Scott N. Carlson, Gregory Grisvold
Michigan Journal of International Law
The study of post-conflict Kosovo presents an important opportunity to distill lessons that can provide guidance for future post-conflict, transitional administrations. The lessons-learned from an analysis of any post-conflict setting are many and varied. The goal of this short paper is limited to the identification of key lessons-learned in the effort to reestablish the judiciary and rule of law in post-conflict Kosovo. Even within this limited setting, this paper is not intended to provide exhaustive coverage of the issue. Rather, it is intended to provide the reader with basic information and central themes that are essential to a discussion of …
Stalking Secret Law: What Predicts Publication In The United States Courts Of Appeals, Deborah J. Merritt, James J. Brudney
Stalking Secret Law: What Predicts Publication In The United States Courts Of Appeals, Deborah J. Merritt, James J. Brudney
Vanderbilt Law Review
For more than a quarter century, the United States Courts of Appeals have maintained two bodies of law. One is published, widely disseminated, and fully precedential. The other, now encompassing nearly 80% of all dispositions on the merits,' is unpublished, erratically distributed, and rarely precedential. What distinguishes these two sets of cases? Is it possible to predict why judges publish opinions in some cases while resolving others through unpublished opinions, memoranda, or judgment orders?
Each court has formal rules governing the publication of opinions, but those standards fail to account for variations in publication. Despite substantial overlap among circuit rules, …
The Arkansas Supreme Court And The Aftermath Of The Civil War, L. Scott Stafford
The Arkansas Supreme Court And The Aftermath Of The Civil War, L. Scott Stafford
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Pragmatic Justification Of The Judicial Hunch, Mark C. Modak-Truran
A Pragmatic Justification Of The Judicial Hunch, Mark C. Modak-Truran
University of Richmond Law Review
Judges currently face a daunting task. On the one hand, they are increasingly aware of the indeterminacy of the law, while on the other hand, they face an explosion of fact. Judges are floating on shaky legal timbers in a sea of documents, deposition transcripts, affidavits, oral courtroom testimony, and expert opinions. The explosion of fact alone presents monumental problems for deciding cases without unduly simplifying or reducing this factual complexity. For example, both federal and state judges are implementing case management systems to deal with their crushing case loads and the increasing complexity of their cases. In addition, there …
In The Wake Of Crosby V. National Foreign Trade Council: The Impact Upon Selective Purchasing Legislation Throughout The United States, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 827 (2001), Ako Miyaki-Murphy
In The Wake Of Crosby V. National Foreign Trade Council: The Impact Upon Selective Purchasing Legislation Throughout The United States, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 827 (2001), Ako Miyaki-Murphy
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Courts As Watchdogs Of The Washington State Initiative Process, Kenneth P. Miller
Courts As Watchdogs Of The Washington State Initiative Process, Kenneth P. Miller
Seattle University Law Review
This Article describes the high rate at which courts have invali- dated Washington initiatives and then explores why this is so. The Article suggests that it is initiative lawmaking's Populist orientation—with respect to both its unfiltered majoritarian processes and its often—constitutionally suspect substance-that makes initiatives vulnerable to legal attack.
A New Approach To Statutory Interpretation In Washington, Philip A. Talmadge
A New Approach To Statutory Interpretation In Washington, Philip A. Talmadge
Seattle University Law Review
In this article, I will first explore Washington's existing law, both statutory and judicial, on statutory interpretation. I will then evaluate the mechanisms for construing statutes derived from common law and legislative sources. Finally, I will recommend a new paradigm for statutory construction so that legislative intent may be more accurately conveyed to the courts, abandoning many of the time-encrusted canons in favor of principles of interpretation adhering more specifically to the legislature's actual statutory language.
Thou Shall Not Strike: Religion-Based Peremptory Challenges Under The Washington State Constitution, Justin Dolan
Thou Shall Not Strike: Religion-Based Peremptory Challenges Under The Washington State Constitution, Justin Dolan
Seattle University Law Review
This Comment will first define the peremptory challenge and discuss its history and normative values. It will then examine the United States Supreme Court's treatment of the peremptory challenge, focusing on how the peremptory challenge has changed from a litigation device that lawyers could exercise without explanation to one that at times requires an explanation for it to survive constitutional challenge. Next, this Comment will discuss state courts' independent interpretation of fundamental rights, Washington courts' decisions in harmony with this principle, and State v. Gunwall, the guide to independent constitutional interpretation in Washington. This Comment will show that under …
Setting The Record Straight: A Proposal For Handling Prosecutorial Appeals To Racial, Ethnic Or Gender Prejudice During Trial, Andrea D. Lyon
Setting The Record Straight: A Proposal For Handling Prosecutorial Appeals To Racial, Ethnic Or Gender Prejudice During Trial, Andrea D. Lyon
Michigan Journal of Race and Law
This article proposes that direct or indirect references to the protected classes of race and/or gender should always be subject to the Chapman v. California "harmless beyond a reasonable doubt" standard. Once the defendant has shown appeals to racial or gender bias in prosecutorial argument or other conduct during his trial, the burden must shift to the prosecution to show at an immediate hearing outside the presence of the jury, beyond a reasonable doubt, that this impermissible appeal to bias did not affect the fairness of the defendant's trial. Furthermore, courts must take the examination of the prosecution's proof seriously, …
Prospects For Justice In Rwanda’S Citizen Tribunals, Leah Werchick
Prospects For Justice In Rwanda’S Citizen Tribunals, Leah Werchick
Human Rights Brief
No abstract provided.
Preliminary Injunctions And The Status Quo, Thomas R. Lee
Preliminary Injunctions And The Status Quo, Thomas R. Lee
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Role Of The Presiding Judge In Garnering Respect For Decisions Of International Courts, Jean Allain
The Role Of The Presiding Judge In Garnering Respect For Decisions Of International Courts, Jean Allain
Michigan Journal of International Law
The following study considers the role that should be assumed by a presiding judge to ensure full respect for the rule of law internationally. The foundation for this study lies in an examination of the dispute settlement provisions of the Law of the Sea Convention as well as its mechanism for the settlement of disputes-the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. The Tribunal was called upon to deliver judgment in the MIV Saiga case. The judgment, along with the primary dissenting opinion, are considered, compared, and analyzed in order to demonstrate the extent to which the judgment is, …