Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Courts (41)
- Constitutional law (30)
- Judicial process (30)
- Supreme Court (26)
- Federal government (25)
-
- Separation of powers (18)
- Judicial review (16)
- Judicial power (15)
- Law--Interpretation and construction (15)
- Judges (14)
- International courts (12)
- Jurisdiction (12)
- United States (12)
- Appellate courts (11)
- Human rights (10)
- Political questions and judicial power (8)
- United States. Congress (8)
- Executive power (7)
- Appellate procedure (6)
- District courts (6)
- Equality before the law--United States (6)
- Ethics (6)
- Government liability (6)
- Judicial opinions (6)
- Treaties (6)
- Civil procedure (5)
- Constitutional history (5)
- Court of Justice of the European Communities (5)
- Due process of law (5)
- Empirical (5)
Articles 211 - 216 of 216
Full-Text Articles in Law
A Political And Constitutional Review Of United States V. Nixon, William W. Van Alstyne
A Political And Constitutional Review Of United States V. Nixon, William W. Van Alstyne
Faculty Scholarship
This comparison of United States v. Nixon and the Pentagon Papers case finds the greatest similarity and significance shared by the two cases was the anti-climactic nature of their conclusions. While both cases concerned constitutional questions of the highest order, centered around the scope of the executive power, both cases were drawn on such narrow grounds that there was hardly any effect on constitutional law doctrine.
Court Reform In England, Kazimierz Grzybowski
Court Reform In England, Kazimierz Grzybowski
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Judicial Power, The “Political Question Doctrine,” And Foreign Relations, Michael E. Tigar
Judicial Power, The “Political Question Doctrine,” And Foreign Relations, Michael E. Tigar
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Book Review, Michael E. Tigar
Book Review, William W. Van Alstyne
Book Review, William W. Van Alstyne
Faculty Scholarship
This review of "The Supreme Court on Trial" by Charles Hyneman, questions why the work’s tackling the age-old issues of the source of judicial review and its constitutionality is particularly novel or unique from other such examinations. Issue is also taken with Brown v. Board of Educaion's dominance of such discussion and the book’s poor treatment of the desegregation cases.
Executive Privilege In The Federal Courts, Paul Hardin Iii
Executive Privilege In The Federal Courts, Paul Hardin Iii
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.