Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (13)
- Seattle University School of Law (4)
- Pepperdine University (3)
- Fordham Law School (2)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
-
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Mississippi College School of Law (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (1)
- University of Colorado Law School (1)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (1)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (13)
- Seattle University Law Review (4)
- Pepperdine Law Review (3)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (2)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (2)
-
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (1)
- Mississippi College Law Review (1)
- Mitchell Hamline Law Review (1)
- Notre Dame Law Review (1)
- Oklahoma Law Review (1)
- Pace International Law Review (1)
- University of Colorado Law Review Forum (1)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (1)
Articles 31 - 34 of 34
Full-Text Articles in Law
Booth V. Maryland, Insights Into The Contemporary Challenges To Judging, Joan M. Shaughnessy
Booth V. Maryland, Insights Into The Contemporary Challenges To Judging, Joan M. Shaughnessy
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Book Review: H. Fingarette & A. Fingarette Hasse, Mental Disabilities And Criminal Responsibilities, John Q. La Fond
Book Review: H. Fingarette & A. Fingarette Hasse, Mental Disabilities And Criminal Responsibilities, John Q. La Fond
Seattle University Law Review
Whether mental illness and related impairments in the human psyche should affect an individual's criminal responsibilityfor law-breaking behavior has always provoked intense andwide-ranging debate. This debate clearly reflects society's lack of consensus concerning the appropriateness and scope of considering mental impairment in assessing individual criminal responsiblility. Thus, it is not unexpected that recently proposals to abolish the insanity defense have been seriously suggested or that noted scholars have urged society to place the disposition of mentally ill offenders in the exclusive hands of experts. That this heated discussion continues unabated should come as no surprise, since legal doctrines which excuse …
Appellate Review Of Legal But Excessive Sentences: A Comparative Study, Gerhard O.W. Mueller, Fre Le Poole
Appellate Review Of Legal But Excessive Sentences: A Comparative Study, Gerhard O.W. Mueller, Fre Le Poole
Vanderbilt Law Review
Classical penology was conceived in France in the eighteenth century, and then eclipsed all over the world in the nineteenth, when Lombroso conjured up the picture of the born criminal. It was finally laid to rest in the United States in the twentieth century. Its basic tenet had been simple enough: the legislature in its infinite wisdom would seek and find the appropriate punishment for every crime.This can be accomplished if a crime is defined narrowly enough, perhaps by the creation of subcategories of that crime, so as to encompass all potential perpetrators who will each incur the same amount …
Recent Cases, Law Review Staff
Recent Cases, Law Review Staff
Vanderbilt Law Review
Recent Cases
Agency--Liability of Master for Servant's Acts--State Permit to Operate
Agency--Possession as Indicia of Ownership
Constitutional Law--Aliens--Detention Where Deportations is Impossible
Courts--Contempt--Delay in Summary Punishment
Criminal Law--Habitual Criminal Statutes--Meaning of Previous Conviction Requirement
Domestic Relations--Liability of Husband for Necessaries of Wife Rightfully Living Apart
Income Taxation--Excludibility from Gross Income of Payment over Ceiling Price
Income Taxation--Taxable Income--Claim of Right
Procedure--Grand Jury--Motion to Expunge Defamatory Remarks in Report
Procedure--Statute of Limitations--Retroactive Operation
Statutes--Holding of Unconstitutionality Overruled--Necessity for Re-Enactment
Wills--Contest--Interest of Legatee's Representative