Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Universitas Indonesia (158)
- William & Mary Law School (51)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (27)
- United Arab Emirates University (25)
- Brooklyn Law School (21)
-
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (19)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (19)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (18)
- Seattle University School of Law (17)
- Notre Dame Law School (16)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (16)
- The University of Akron (15)
- UC Law SF (15)
- University of Kentucky (14)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (14)
- Florida International University College of Law (13)
- Fordham Law School (13)
- University of Washington School of Law (13)
- University of Michigan Law School (12)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (11)
- Pepperdine University (11)
- St. Mary's University (11)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (9)
- University of Georgia School of Law (8)
- St. John's University School of Law (7)
- University of Colorado Law School (7)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (7)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (7)
- Brigham Young University Law School (6)
- Cornell University Law School (6)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (37)
- Constitutional law (36)
- Constitution (32)
- Supreme Court (29)
- First Amendment (27)
-
- Congress (12)
- Free speech (12)
- Second Amendment (12)
- Privacy (11)
- Abortion (10)
- Federalism (10)
- Qualified Immunity (10)
- Bivens (8)
- COVID-19 (8)
- Civil rights (8)
- Damages (8)
- Donald Trump (8)
- Due process (8)
- Federal Officers (8)
- Racial classifications (8)
- Separation of powers (8)
- United States Constitution 1st Amendment (8)
- Constitutional rights (7)
- Criminal Law (7)
- Eighth Amendment (7)
- Fifth Amendment (7)
- First Amendment; Freedom of Speech; Free speech; Constitutional Law; John Roberts; Roberts Court; Free Expression; Freedom of Expression; First Freedom; Supreme Court jurisprudence; Constitution; Constitutional Principles (7)
- Fourteenth Amendment (7)
- Guns (7)
- Human Rights (7)
- Publication
-
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (120)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (34)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (30)
- University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law (27)
- UAEU Law Journal (25)
-
- Touro Law Review (18)
- Arkansas Law Review (17)
- Seattle University Law Review (16)
- University of Cincinnati Law Review (16)
- UC Law Constitutional Quarterly (15)
- Journal of Natural Resources & Environmental Law (14)
- Northwestern University Law Review (14)
- Notre Dame Law Review (14)
- FIU Law Review (13)
- Brooklyn Law Review (12)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (11)
- Fordham Environmental Law Review (11)
- Washington Law Review (11)
- Pepperdine Law Review (10)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (10)
- ConLawNOW (9)
- William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice (9)
- William & Mary Law Review (9)
- Catholic University Law Review (8)
- Michigan Law Review (8)
- Villanova Law Review (8)
- Maryland Law Review (7)
- Akron Law Review (6)
- BYU Law Review (6)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (6)
Articles 691 - 695 of 695
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Deans' Roundtable, Dean Angela Onwuachi-Willig, Dean Danielle Conway, Dean Tamara Lawson, Dean Mario Barnes, Dean L. Song Richardson
The Deans' Roundtable, Dean Angela Onwuachi-Willig, Dean Danielle Conway, Dean Tamara Lawson, Dean Mario Barnes, Dean L. Song Richardson
Seattle University Law Review
The Deans' Roundtable.
Rock And Hard Place Arguments, Jareb Gleckel, Grace Brosofsky
Rock And Hard Place Arguments, Jareb Gleckel, Grace Brosofsky
Seattle University Law Review
This Article explores what we coin “rock and hard place” (RHP) arguments in the law, and it aims to motivate mission-driven plaintiffs to seek out such arguments in their cases. The RHP argument structure helps plaintiffs win cases even when the court views that outcome as unfavorable.
We begin by dissecting RHP dilemmas that have long existed in the American legal system. As Part I reveals, prosecutors and law enforcement officials have often taken advantage of RHP dilemmas and used them as a tool to persuade criminal defendants to forfeit their constitutional rights, confess, or give up the chance to …
Neither Safe, Nor Legal, Nor Rare: The D.C. Circuit’S Use Of The Doctrine Of Ratification To Shield Agency Action From Appointments Clause Challenges, Damien M. Schiff
Neither Safe, Nor Legal, Nor Rare: The D.C. Circuit’S Use Of The Doctrine Of Ratification To Shield Agency Action From Appointments Clause Challenges, Damien M. Schiff
Seattle University Law Review
Key to the constitutional design of the federal government is the separation of powers. An important support for that separation is the Appointments Clause, which governs how officers of the United States are installed in their positions. Although the separation of powers generally, and the Appointments Clause specifically, support democratically accountable government, they also protect individual citizens against abusive government power. But without a judicial remedy, such protection is ineffectual—a mere parchment barrier.
Such has become the fate of the Appointments Clause in the D.C. Circuit, thanks to that court’s adoption—and zealous employment—of the rule that agency action, otherwise unconstitutional …
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents.
Corporate Entanglement With Religion And The Suppression Of Expression, Ronald J. Colombo
Corporate Entanglement With Religion And The Suppression Of Expression, Ronald J. Colombo
Seattle University Law Review
The power and ability of corporations to assert their First Amendment rights to the detriment of others remains both a controversial and unresolved issue. Adverting to relevant strands of existing jurisprudence and certain constitutionally relevant factors, this Article suggests a solution. The path turns upon the recognition that whereas some corporations are appropriately categorized as rights-bearing entities (akin to associations), others are more appropriately categorized as “entities against which the rights of individuals can be asserted.” Legislation, in the form of the draft “CENSOR” Act, is provided as a means by which to implement this categorization. What hopefully emerges is …