Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (42)
- American University Washington College of Law (22)
- UC Law SF (20)
- UIC School of Law (19)
- University of Michigan Law School (18)
-
- William & Mary Law School (16)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (12)
- University of Richmond (12)
- Cleveland State University (9)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (9)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (8)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (6)
- West Virginia University (5)
- Fordham Law School (4)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (4)
- University of Kentucky (4)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (4)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (4)
- Brigham Young University Law School (3)
- Campbell University School of Law (3)
- Florida State University College of Law (2)
- Seattle University School of Law (2)
- University of Miami Law School (2)
- University of Washington School of Law (2)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (2)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (1)
- St. Mary's University (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- New York (32)
- Supreme Court (22)
- Constitutional law (15)
- Martha Fineman (12)
- Federalism (11)
-
- Court of Appeals (8)
- Brown v. Board of Education (7)
- Due Process (7)
- Supreme court (7)
- Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts (7)
- First Amendment (6)
- Lochner v. New York (6)
- Abortion (4)
- Akhil Reed Amar (4)
- Book Reviews (4)
- Civil Rights (4)
- Congress (4)
- Constitutional Amendments (4)
- Constitutional Law (4)
- Equal Protection (4)
- Equality (4)
- Family law (4)
- Feminist legal theorists (4)
- Fifth Amendment (4)
- Fineman Plan (4)
- Oklahoma (4)
- Search and Seizure (4)
- United States Constitutional Amendments (4)
- Bill of Rights (3)
- Canada (3)
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (42)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (21)
- UC Law Constitutional Quarterly (20)
- UIC Law Review (19)
- Michigan Law Review (17)
-
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (12)
- University of Richmond Law Review (11)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (10)
- Cleveland State Law Review (9)
- Oklahoma Law Review (9)
- Indiana Law Journal (7)
- William & Mary Law Review (6)
- West Virginia Law Review (5)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (4)
- Kentucky Law Journal (4)
- Osgoode Hall Law Journal (4)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (4)
- Villanova Law Review (4)
- Campbell Law Review (3)
- Maryland Law Review (3)
- BYU Law Review (2)
- Seattle University Law Review (2)
- University of Miami Inter-American Law Review (2)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (2)
- American University Law Review (1)
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (1)
- Buffalo Law Review (1)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (1)
- Florida State University Journal of Transnational Law & Policy (1)
- Florida State University Law Review (1)
Articles 211 - 237 of 237
Full-Text Articles in Law
Invisibly Radiated: Federalism Principles And The Proposed Hague Convention On Jurisdiction And Foreign Judgments, Khoi D. Nguyen
Invisibly Radiated: Federalism Principles And The Proposed Hague Convention On Jurisdiction And Foreign Judgments, Khoi D. Nguyen
UC Law Constitutional Quarterly
The proposed Hague Convention provides the United States with a guarantee that U.S. judgments in commercial and civil matters involving at least one foreign party will be recognized and enforced among the signatory countries. It requires the courts that render the judgments to have proper jurisdiction over the parties and the controversies based on a list of accepted and prohibited grounds for the exercise of jurisdiction. Among the prohibited grounds are transient and "doing business" general jurisdiction. Pursuant to the Hague convention, Congress would have to pass implementing legislation proscribing these prohibited bases of jurisdiction in both federal and state …
Constitutionality Of State And Local Selective Purchasing Legislation: A 9-0 Supreme Court Decision In Favor Of And In Defeat Of Plaintiff, Rebecca S. Hartley
Constitutionality Of State And Local Selective Purchasing Legislation: A 9-0 Supreme Court Decision In Favor Of And In Defeat Of Plaintiff, Rebecca S. Hartley
UC Law Constitutional Quarterly
In a 9-0 decision handed down in 2000, the Supreme Court struck down a Massachusetts selective purchasing law that restricted state agencies from trading with companies doing business in Burma. The Court based its decision on the narrow grounds that the law violated the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution. In the wake of so limited a decision, a number of constitutional questions remain unanswered regarding the rights of states to enact laws intruding upon federal foreign affairs.
This article examines three of the main areas of constitutional challenges to state actions in the foreign affairs arena from current orthodox …
Supreme Court Voting Behavior: 1998 Term, Richard G. Wilkins, Scott Worthington, R. Chad Hales, Rachelle Fleming
Supreme Court Voting Behavior: 1998 Term, Richard G. Wilkins, Scott Worthington, R. Chad Hales, Rachelle Fleming
UC Law Constitutional Quarterly
This Article, the fourteenth in a series, tabulates and analyzes the voting behavior of the United States Supreme Court. This particular study examines the Court's voting behavior during the 1998 Term. The Article attempts to determine whether individual Justices and the Court as a whole are voting more "conservatively," more "liberally," or about the same as compared with past terms.
Whether a vote is considered "conservative" or "liberal" depends upon the issues being decided. Generally, votes favoring the assertion of governmental power are "conservative," while those favoring claims of individual liberty are considered "liberal." The issues are categorized into ten …
Toward The Restorative Constitution: A Restorative Justice Critique Of Anti-Gang Public Nuisance Injunctions, Joan W. Howarth
Toward The Restorative Constitution: A Restorative Justice Critique Of Anti-Gang Public Nuisance Injunctions, Joan W. Howarth
UC Law Constitutional Quarterly
The use of public nuisance injunctions against gangs and suspected gang members is an aggressive prosecutorial strategy upheld and even endorsed by a majority of the California Supreme Court in 1997 in People ex rel. Gallo v. Acuna. This Article critiques these injunctions through the lens of restorative justice principles. Restorative justice rests on the tenet that any crime is injurious, and that the best response is one that heals injuries caused to the victim, the community, and the offender. The Article argues that although anti-gang public nuisance injunctions share significant similarities with some restorative justice programs, the injunctions undermine …
Bad Girls And Good Sports: Some Reflections On Violent Female Juvenile Delinquents, Title Ix &(And) The Promise Of Girl Power, Cheryl Hanna
Bad Girls And Good Sports: Some Reflections On Violent Female Juvenile Delinquents, Title Ix &(And) The Promise Of Girl Power, Cheryl Hanna
UC Law Constitutional Quarterly
In recent years, the number of female juvenile offenders has been increasing at a faster pace than that of their male counterparts. This Article explores the link between criminality and competition among women. Specifically, it examines the role that involvement in organized sports, or conversely, lack of competition, plays in the development of criminal behavior. Part I addresses the theme of female competition, violence, and sports, and draws conclusions from secondary interdisciplinary research and conversations with incarcerated juvenile females. Part II focuses upon Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 and suggests that the rationale behind gender equity in …
Criminal Aliens Get Pinched: Sandoval V. Reno, Aedpa's And Iirira's Effect On Habeas Corpus Jurisdiction, Matthew J. Droskoski
Criminal Aliens Get Pinched: Sandoval V. Reno, Aedpa's And Iirira's Effect On Habeas Corpus Jurisdiction, Matthew J. Droskoski
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Pain Relief Promotion Act: Will It Spell Death To "Death With Dignity" Or Is It Unconstitutional?, Joy Fallek
The Pain Relief Promotion Act: Will It Spell Death To "Death With Dignity" Or Is It Unconstitutional?, Joy Fallek
Fordham Urban Law Journal
This Note explores Congress' attempts to restrict Oregon's Death with Dignity Act by enacting two the Lethal Drug Abuse and Prevention Act of 1998 ("LDAP Act") and the Pain Relief Promotion Act of 1999 ("PRPA"). It explores constitutional decisions concerning physician-assisted suicide and those which tend to show that the Supreme Court demonstrated federalist leanings during this time. The Note concludes that this Congressional legislation is a premature attempt to restrict experimentation concerning physician-assisted suicide and that the Supreme Court should strive to thwart attempts to cut off such experimentation.
Stopping Hate Without Stifling Speech: Re-Examining The Merits Of Hate Speech Codes On University Campuses, Catherine B. Johnson
Stopping Hate Without Stifling Speech: Re-Examining The Merits Of Hate Speech Codes On University Campuses, Catherine B. Johnson
Fordham Urban Law Journal
This Note explores legislative attempts to help reduce incidents of hate speech on university campuses. It begins by analyzing the rise in hate speech codes at public universities and examining two U.S. Supreme Court decisions in R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul and Wisconsin v. Mitchell. The author argues that a hate speech code that implements forward-looking, long-term education objective would work towards stopping hate on campus without violating students' First Amendment rights. This Note reaches the conclusion that a narrowly drawn hate speech code based on recognized First Amendment exceptions, implemented along with with education initiatives, could facilitate the …
Child Access Prevention Laws: Keeping Guns Out Of Our Children's Hands, Rachel Shaffer
Child Access Prevention Laws: Keeping Guns Out Of Our Children's Hands, Rachel Shaffer
Fordham Urban Law Journal
This Note explores the Child Access Prevention ("CAP") law and laws which are generally intended to limit children's access to guns at home. The author proposes a model CAP law that should be enacted in the United States. This Note discusses the evolution of CAP laws and presents for arguments for and against such laws. It delves into the National Rifle Association's ("NRA") powerful influence that improperly prevents CAP laws from being enacted by the federal government. Additionally, it is argued that unless the federal government enacts a CAP law, innocent children will continue to be injure and lose their …
Life On Campus Really Ain't So Bad, Avern Cohn
Life On Campus Really Ain't So Bad, Avern Cohn
Michigan Law Review
The Shadow University is a highly tendentious account of Alan Charles Kors and Harvey A. Silverglate's view of academic and student life in America's colleges and universities over the last twenty years. Kors and Silverglate see these colleges and universities turning from promoting personal and academic freedom to suppressing open expression and denying basic liberties to students and faculty alike. To make their point, they have scoured college and university campuses from coast to coast to find incidents involving student speech code violations, as well as student and faculty discipline and misbehavior proceedings. They also examine multicultural and diversity programs …
Section 1983 Litigation - Supreme Court Developments, Martin A. Schwartz
Section 1983 Litigation - Supreme Court Developments, Martin A. Schwartz
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Confrontation Clause, Doris Waldman
Local Elections, Roger Moran
Preemption, Roger Moran
Due Process, Kathleen Byrne
Due Process, Kimberly Lumpee
Resolving The Dissonant Constitutional Chords Inherent In The Federal Anti-Bootlegging Statute In United States V. Moghadam, Keith V. Lee
Resolving The Dissonant Constitutional Chords Inherent In The Federal Anti-Bootlegging Statute In United States V. Moghadam, Keith V. Lee
Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Lessons From The Past And Strategies For The Future: Using Domestic, International And Comparative Law To Overturn Sodomy Laws, Charlene Smith, James Wilets
Lessons From The Past And Strategies For The Future: Using Domestic, International And Comparative Law To Overturn Sodomy Laws, Charlene Smith, James Wilets
Seattle University Law Review
This Article will first discuss the legal importance of challenging sodomy laws, even though those laws are rarely enforced. It will then discuss the importance of incorporating international and comparative law in formulating these challenges. In Section II, Professor Charlene Smith will discuss past and future strategies, focusing on the topics of equal protection, morality, and the difference (or lack thereof) between acts and status. In Section III, Professor Jim Wilets will explore incorporating international and comparative law into domestic challenges to U.S. sodomy laws. This Article will demonstrate that there is binding Supreme Court authority requiring all U.S. courts …
Double Jeopardy And Punishment: Why An As Applied Approach, As Applied To Separation Of Powers Doctrines, Is Unconstitutional, Todd W. Wyatt
Double Jeopardy And Punishment: Why An As Applied Approach, As Applied To Separation Of Powers Doctrines, Is Unconstitutional, Todd W. Wyatt
Seattle University Law Review
This Comment will argue that an as applied approach allows the executive branch, whether at the state or federal level, to encroach into the legislative realm by rendering a statute unconstitutional as a result of the way the statute is administered. Section II of this Comment will begin by examining the history of the as applied and on its face double jeopardy approaches during the last 20 years. After a close examination of the decisions in Halper and Hudson in sections II.B and II.C, this Comment will explain why the holding of Hudson, though correct in its result, was …
Houlton Citizens' Coalition V. Town Of Houlton: Is An Open And Competitive Bidding Process Really The Solution To National Waste Disposal Problems, Jason Barocas
Villanova Environmental Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Federalism's Old Deal: What's Right And Wrong With Conservative Judicial Activism, Peter M. Shane
Federalism's Old Deal: What's Right And Wrong With Conservative Judicial Activism, Peter M. Shane
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Can Public Schools Really Permit Religious Speech Without Promoting Religion - The Struggle To Accommodate But Not Establish Religion In Chandler V. James, Lynne A. Rafalowski
Can Public Schools Really Permit Religious Speech Without Promoting Religion - The Struggle To Accommodate But Not Establish Religion In Chandler V. James, Lynne A. Rafalowski
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Pennsylvania's Reasonable Expectations Doctrine: The Third Circuit's Perspective, Thomas J. Rueter, Joshua H. Roberts
Pennsylvania's Reasonable Expectations Doctrine: The Third Circuit's Perspective, Thomas J. Rueter, Joshua H. Roberts
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Dissent, Free Speech, And The Continuing Search For The "Central Meaning" Of The First Amendment, Ronald J. Krotoszynski Jr.
Dissent, Free Speech, And The Continuing Search For The "Central Meaning" Of The First Amendment, Ronald J. Krotoszynski Jr.
Michigan Law Review
Since the Warren Court's expansive construction of the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment, there has been no shortage of legal scholarship aimed at justifying the remarkably broad protections afforded the freedom of speech under landmark cases such as Brandenburg v. Ohio, New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, and Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc. At the same time, in recent years, a growing chorus of free speech skeptics have made their voices heard.5 These legal scholars have questioned why a commitment to freedom of expression should displace other (constitutional) values such as equality, …
The Importance Of Being Biased, Anthony M. Dillof
The Importance Of Being Biased, Anthony M. Dillof
Michigan Law Review
The war against bias crimes is far from finished. In contrast, the battle over bias-crime laws is largely over. Bias-crime laws, as commonly formulated, increase the penalties for crimes motivated by bias. The Supreme Court has held that such laws do not violate the First Amendment. Virtually every state has enacted some sort of biascrime law. Even the federal government, which may consider itself without power to enact a general bias-crime law, has made bias a sentence-aggravating factor for the range of federal criminal offenses. Bias-crime laws thus are an established feature of the legal landscape. Against this background, Frederick …
The Path Of American Religious Liberty: From The Original Theology To Formal Neutrality And An Uncertain Future, Daniel O. Conkle
The Path Of American Religious Liberty: From The Original Theology To Formal Neutrality And An Uncertain Future, Daniel O. Conkle
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: Religious Liberty at the Dawn of a New Millennium held at Indiana University School of Law-Bloomington on April 9, 1999.
Tort Liability, Religious Entities, And The Decline Of Constitutional Protection, Scott C. Idleman
Tort Liability, Religious Entities, And The Decline Of Constitutional Protection, Scott C. Idleman
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: Religious Liberty at the Dawn of a New Millennium held at Indiana University School of Law-Bloomington on April 9, 1999.