Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Comparative and Foreign Law

Washington Law Review

1964

Articles 1 - 10 of 10

Full-Text Articles in Law

Law In Japana: The Legal Order In A Changing Society, Edited By Arthur T. Von Mehren (1963), Harold G. Wren Aug 1964

Law In Japana: The Legal Order In A Changing Society, Edited By Arthur T. Von Mehren (1963), Harold G. Wren

Washington Law Review

No abstract provided.


American-Japanese Private International Law, By Albert A. Ehrenzweig, Sueo Ikehara, And Norman Jensen (1964), David S. Stern Aug 1964

American-Japanese Private International Law, By Albert A. Ehrenzweig, Sueo Ikehara, And Norman Jensen (1964), David S. Stern

Washington Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Protection In Japan Of Inventions By Employees During The Course Of Their Employment, Bunzo Takino, Ward M. French Aug 1964

The Protection In Japan Of Inventions By Employees During The Course Of Their Employment, Bunzo Takino, Ward M. French

Washington Law Review

This article will explain the principles involved in article 35 of the Patent Law of Japan, as revised in 1959, dealing with employee inventions in Japan. The history of the revisions which have produced the present article will be discussed, then an interpretation of article 35 will be made, and finally an analysis and criticism of this article through a comparison with foreign laws will be provided.


The Antimonopoly Law Of Japan And Its Enforcement, Michiko Ariga, Luvern V. Rieke Aug 1964

The Antimonopoly Law Of Japan And Its Enforcement, Michiko Ariga, Luvern V. Rieke

Washington Law Review

The Antimonopoly Law of Japan became effective in July 1947, less than two decades ago. The act was extravagantly endorsed by the U.S. occupation forces as a charter for the economic future of Japan. It was indeed a significant undertaking, designed to implant democratic practices where none had existed before, and it required basic, almost revolutionary, changes in the economic structure of the nation. Equally important was the circumstance that this law was neither sought nor desired by the Japanese. It was imposed upon a defeated people, a device entirely alien to the history and culture of those who were …


Introduction To U.S.-Japanese Investment, Dan Fenno Henderson Aug 1964

Introduction To U.S.-Japanese Investment, Dan Fenno Henderson

Washington Law Review

The legal environment for foreign investment in Japan has undergone sweeping changes in the past year, both in the Japanese domestic legislation and in the international law spheres. New international law commitments started with findings of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) about a year and a half ago that Japanese economic conditions warranted a relaxation of foreign exchange controls, and after the necessary adjustments, on March 12, 1964, Japan arranged to shift her IMF status from an Article XIV country to an Article VIII country, meaning essentially that thereafter her foreign exchange budget was abolished and her current accounts (i.e., …


Alien Lawyers In The United States And Japan—A Comparative Study, Kaname Ohira, George Neff Stevens Aug 1964

Alien Lawyers In The United States And Japan—A Comparative Study, Kaname Ohira, George Neff Stevens

Washington Law Review

The steadily increasing economic and social contacts between Japan and the United States are illustrative of a development which has brought lawyers and laymen of all countries face to face with the need for more adequate, and accurate, information about the laws of all countries. Since the lawyer is the fount to which the informed layman turns for legal advice, it would seem quite natural for such a layman, faced with a problem involving foreign law, either to seek advice from his own attorney, or to turn to an alien admitted to the bar of the country, the laws of …


Court And Constitution In Japan . . . Selected Supreme Court Decisions, 1948-60, By John M. Maki (1964), Alfred C. Oppler Aug 1964

Court And Constitution In Japan . . . Selected Supreme Court Decisions, 1948-60, By John M. Maki (1964), Alfred C. Oppler

Washington Law Review

No abstract provided.


Contract Problems In U.S.-Japanese Joint Ventures, Dan Fenno Henderson Aug 1964

Contract Problems In U.S.-Japanese Joint Ventures, Dan Fenno Henderson

Washington Law Review

U.S.-Japanese joint ventures are by far the most important form of direct foreign investment in Japan. For unlike most advanced governments elsewhere in the world, Japanese officialdom has, with precious few exceptions, denied validation under the Law Concerning Foreign Investment to all enterprises wholly-owned or even majority-owned by foreigners. Furthermore, it was basic Japanese policy not to validate even a minority equity in a Japanese enterprise unless the foreigner possessed essential technology which he would not make available to Japanese industry by straight patent or know-how licensing arrangements. Since before July 1963 validation only meant the right to repatriate capital …


Japanese Investment Trusts, Hiroo Mizushima, Howard L. Lund, Masao Sekiguchi Aug 1964

Japanese Investment Trusts, Hiroo Mizushima, Howard L. Lund, Masao Sekiguchi

Washington Law Review

Foreigners have been freely permitted to purchase shares of Japanese corporations since 1950, with the condition that the principal would not be freely remitted abroad. Until 1960 little attention was paid to this opportunity. The recent increase in foreign interest in Japanese equities has coincided with the easing of currency and exchange restrictions, particularly the shortening of the waiting period for the conversion of invested principal to the original currency of the investor. As of April 1, 1963, the waiting period was entirely eliminated, with the expectation of increased foreign investments. Because of the significant increase of foreign offerings in …


Personal Property As Collateral In Japan And The United States, Kazuaki Sono, Warren L. Shattuck Aug 1964

Personal Property As Collateral In Japan And The United States, Kazuaki Sono, Warren L. Shattuck

Washington Law Review

It is our purpose to compare Japanese and United States law and practice in the area of personal property security. Since it is not possible to find a precise common terminology for different types of security transactions, it seems desirable to arrange the discussion in terms of possessory and non-possessory security, and to use as subheads in the latter category the names of the American security devices. Security transfers of intangibles, chattel paper, and title documents are discussed under the possessory-security classification. An appendix includes English translations of cited Japanese statutes and pertinent Civil and Commercial Code as well as …