Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- VRA (3)
- Disparate impact (2)
- Racial discrimination (2)
- Reynolds v. Sims (2)
- Shelby County v. Holder (2)
-
- Voting Rights Act (2)
- 1968 (1)
- 3610(d) (1)
- 426 U.S. 229 (1)
- 429 U.S. 252 (1)
- ADA (1)
- Alienage (1)
- Americans with Disabilities Act (1)
- Anderson v. Celebrezze (1)
- Anderson-Burdick (1)
- Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing (1)
- At-will (1)
- Baker v. Carr (1)
- Bazemore (1)
- Bill of Rights (1)
- Brown v. Board of Education (1)
- Burdick v. Takushi (1)
- Citizens United (1)
- Civil Rights Act of 1964 (1)
- Congressional authority (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Crawford (1)
- Deadline (1)
- Demographic determinism (1)
- Discrimination (1)
Articles 31 - 38 of 38
Full-Text Articles in Law
Florida's Omnibus Aids Act Of 1988, Robert Craig Waters
Florida's Omnibus Aids Act Of 1988, Robert Craig Waters
Florida State University Law Review
In response to the growing fears and sometimes irrational attitudes associated with the deadly disease AIDS, the 1988 Florida Legislature passed the Omnibus AIDS Act, affecting twelve substantive areas of law. In this Article, the author examines each of these areas, suggests the most likely interpretation the courts will accord the new provisions, and makes recommendations to correct oversights and inconsistencies in existing laws.
Aids Discrimination Under Federal, State, And Local Law After Arline, Robert P. Wasson, Jr.
Aids Discrimination Under Federal, State, And Local Law After Arline, Robert P. Wasson, Jr.
Florida State University Law Review
In School Board v. Arline, the United States Supreme Court determined that people who suffer from tuberculosis can be protected from employment discrimination by the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Arline is certain to affect people afflicted with AIDS-related disorders who suffer discrimination. In this Article, Professor Wasson examines the Arline decision and the effect it will have on AIDS-related discrimination. Also, he examines provisions of the United States Constitution, acts of Congress, state law, and municipal ordinances, all of which might provide alternative measures of protection for those who suffer AIDS-related discrimination.
Desegregating The University Of Florida Law School: Virgil Hawkins V. The Florida Board Of Control, Darryl Paulson, Paul Hawkes
Desegregating The University Of Florida Law School: Virgil Hawkins V. The Florida Board Of Control, Darryl Paulson, Paul Hawkes
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Stotts V. Memphis Fire Department, 679 F.2d 541 (6th Cir. 1982), Cert. Granted, 51 U.S.L.W. 3871 (U.S. June 7, 1983) (No. 82-229), Timothy P. Hoban
Stotts V. Memphis Fire Department, 679 F.2d 541 (6th Cir. 1982), Cert. Granted, 51 U.S.L.W. 3871 (U.S. June 7, 1983) (No. 82-229), Timothy P. Hoban
Florida State University Law Review
Constitutional Law-Civil Rights-THE SIXTH CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT JUDICIALLY IMPOSED RACIAL QUOTAS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER A SENIORITY SYSTEM
The Discriminatory Effects Of At-Large Elections, Barbara L. Berry, Thomas R. Dye
The Discriminatory Effects Of At-Large Elections, Barbara L. Berry, Thomas R. Dye
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Civil Rights Litigation: An Investigation, Preparation & Trial Manual, P. Kent Spriggs
Civil Rights Litigation: An Investigation, Preparation & Trial Manual, P. Kent Spriggs
Florida State University Law Review
By Andrew J. Ruzicho.1 Cincinnati: Anderson Publishing Co., 1976. Pp. xvii, 372. $35.00.
The Statute Of Limitations In The Fair Housing Act: Trap For The Unwary, Edward Phillips Nickinson, Iii
The Statute Of Limitations In The Fair Housing Act: Trap For The Unwary, Edward Phillips Nickinson, Iii
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Weinberger V. Wiesenfeld, 95 S. Ct. 1225 (1975), Barbara Cozad Biddle
Weinberger V. Wiesenfeld, 95 S. Ct. 1225 (1975), Barbara Cozad Biddle
Florida State University Law Review
Constitutional Law- EQUAL PROTECTION- DENYING SOCIAL SECURITY "MOTHER'S INSURANCE BENEFITS" TO FATHERS VIOLATES EQUAL PROTECTION COMPONENT OF FIFTH AMENDMENT DUE PROCESS CLAUSE.