Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Bath (1)
- Bushell v. Faith (1)
- Campbell v. Australian Mutual Provident Society (1)
- Campbell v. Loew's Co (1)
- English Companies Act (1)
-
- Foss v. Harbottle (1)
- Hall v. Trans-Lux Daylight Picture Screen Co. (1)
- J.I. Case Co. v. Borak (1)
- Lawyers' Advertising (1)
- Levin v. MGM (1)
- MBA (1)
- Maryland Corporation Code (1)
- Model Business Corporation Act (1)
- Peel v. London & North Western Ry (1)
- Rosenfeld v. Fairchild Engine & Airplane Corp (1)
- SEC (1)
- Securities Act (1)
- Securities and Exchange Commission (1)
- Steinberg v. Adams (1)
- Studdert v. Grosvenor (1)
- Studebaker Corp.v. Gittlin (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Close Corporation-Comparing The Separate Statutory Treatments Of Florida, Delaware And Maryland With Virginia's Version Of The Model Act
University of Richmond Law Review
In a trend beginning before the turn of the nineteenth century and accelerating during the period after the Second World War, state corporation laws have evolved into enabling acts recognizing and catering to modem business practices The restrictions retained in these acts remain both to protect the public and balance the relationships between interested parties within the corporation. Despite these remaining restrictions, the philosophy of the modem acts is to create a climate favorable for corporate activity.
Restraints On Incumbent Directors In Intracorporate Battles For Control, Aaron Yoran
Restraints On Incumbent Directors In Intracorporate Battles For Control, Aaron Yoran
University of Richmond Law Review
Editor's Note: The first portion of Dr. Yoran's article, dealing with directors' maneuvering power in closed corporations, appeared in the Winter issue of the Review.