Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Títulos Valores (5)
- Corporations (4)
- Mercado de Capitales (4)
- Bruno (3)
- Corporate Governance (3)
-
- Costantini (3)
- Derecho (3)
- Derecho del Consumidor (3)
- European Law (3)
- México (3)
- Presentaciones (3)
- Competition Law (2)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Corporate governance (2)
- Energy Law (2)
- English Arbitration Act 1996 (2)
- Fondos Comunes de Inversión (2)
- Legislación (2)
- Responsabilidad CIvil (2)
- Access to water (1)
- Accounting (1)
- Acquisition (1)
- Agency (1)
- And the effect on investors in Forbes 500 companies (1)
- Animal Law (1)
- Animal law (1)
- Antitrust (1)
- Análisis (1)
- Arrow Theorem (1)
- Artículos (1)
- Publication
-
- Martin Paolantonio (6)
- Mubashshir Sarshar (6)
- Nikola S Georgiev (5)
- Bruno L. Costantini García (4)
- Pablo A Legón (4)
-
- Bruno Ferreira (3)
- Daudi Mwita Nyamaka Mr. (3)
- Luiz Rafael de Vargas Maluf (3)
- David García (2)
- Federico M. Mucciarelli (2)
- Michael Diathesopoulos (2)
- Michael LP Lower (2)
- Omari Scott Simmons (2)
- Bernard S Sharfman (1)
- Bradley T. Borden (1)
- D. A. Jeremy Telman (1)
- Daniel Reach (1)
- Diego G. Pardow (1)
- Edward Ivan Cueva (1)
- Felipe Chagas Villasuso Lago Mr. (1)
- George Geis (1)
- Jernej Letnar Černič (1)
- Joshua P Fershee (1)
- Justin Schwartz (1)
- Matthew G Dore (1)
- Michael Ming Du (1)
- Nishant Choudhary (1)
- Platon Gatsinos (1)
- Tom C. W. Lin (1)
- William Alan Nelson II (1)
- File Type
Articles 61 - 61 of 61
Full-Text Articles in Law
Is The Quest For Corporate Responsibility A Wild Goose Chase? The Story Of Lovenheim V. Iroquois Brands, Ltd., D. A. Jeremy Telman
Is The Quest For Corporate Responsibility A Wild Goose Chase? The Story Of Lovenheim V. Iroquois Brands, Ltd., D. A. Jeremy Telman
D. A. Jeremy Telman
Peter Lovenheim owned a small stake in Iroquois Brands, Ltd (Iroquois). He proposed that the corporation discontinue its distribution of one product, pâté de foie gras, because he objected to the treatment of the geese necessary to the production of the product. Under federal regulations, Iroquois was required to include such proposals in the proxy materials it sent out in advance of its annual shareholder meeting unless an exception applied. Iroquois Brands thought it could exclude the proposal because the product in question constituted a trivial part of its business. Lovenheim went to the District Court seeking an order requiring …