Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of San Diego (47)
- University of Montana (36)
- Universitas Indonesia (34)
- Notre Dame Law School (15)
- Pepperdine University (11)
-
- Yale University (10)
- Barry University School of Law (8)
- University of Michigan Law School (8)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (7)
- Seattle University School of Law (7)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (6)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (6)
- St. John's University School of Law (6)
- University of Maine School of Law (6)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (4)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (4)
- University of Minnesota Law School (4)
- Brooklyn Law School (3)
- Southern Methodist University (3)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (3)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (3)
- University of South Carolina (3)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (3)
- Fordham Law School (2)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (2)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- University of Washington School of Law (2)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Administrative law (10)
- Administrative Procedure Act (9)
- Immigration (8)
- AB 2138 (7)
- Administrative Law (7)
-
- Federal agencies (7)
- APA (6)
- Regulation (6)
- Separation of powers (6)
- AB 544 (5)
- Environmental law (5)
- London Whale (5)
- SEC (5)
- Transparency (5)
- Trump administration (5)
- CIO (4)
- Clean Water Act (4)
- Coastal (4)
- Congress (4)
- Derivatives (4)
- Environmental (4)
- Global Financial Crisis (4)
- Inc. (4)
- Montana (4)
- Ocean (4)
- SB 1109 (4)
- Trump (4)
- AB 149 (3)
- AB 1753 (3)
- AB 2193 (3)
- Publication
-
- California Regulatory Law Reporter (47)
- Public Land & Resources Law Review (36)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (32)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (11)
- Journal of Financial Crises (10)
-
- Notre Dame Law Review (10)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (7)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (6)
- Mitchell Hamline Law Review (6)
- St. John's Law Review (5)
- Arkansas Law Review (4)
- Environmental and Earth Law Journal (EELJ) (4)
- Ocean and Coastal Law Journal (4)
- American Indian Law Journal (3)
- Barry Law Review (3)
- Immigration and Human Rights Law Review (3)
- Journal of Legislation (3)
- Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology (3)
- Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy (3)
- Seattle University Law Review (3)
- South Carolina Law Review (3)
- Catholic University Law Review (2)
- Fordham Law Review (2)
- Georgia Law Review (2)
- Indonesia Law Review (2)
- Journal of Air Law and Commerce (2)
- Maine Law Review (2)
- Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- Notre Dame Law Review Reflection (2)
Articles 241 - 264 of 264
Full-Text Articles in Law
Hiding The Ball: The Proposed Regulatory Accountability Act & Restricting Agency ‘Propaganda’, Benjamin A. Torres
Hiding The Ball: The Proposed Regulatory Accountability Act & Restricting Agency ‘Propaganda’, Benjamin A. Torres
Georgia Law Review
The Senate’s Regulatory Accountability Act (RAA)
seeks to substantially amend the Administrative
Procedure Act, the law governing federal agency
processes. The bill’s sponsors argue, in part, that the
RAA would improve administrative transparency and
accountability. One of the least-discussed provisions,
§ 3(c)(6), “Prohibition on Certain Communications,”
would prohibit agencies from advocating for or against
a proposed regulation during the comment period, an
indispensable component of notice-and-comment
rulemaking that affords the public a voice in the
rulemaking process. This Note recommends that
agencies should be able to exhibit their preferences at all
stages of rulemaking, because, as policymakers, agencies
should inform …
The Operational And Administrative Militaries, Mark P. Nevitt
The Operational And Administrative Militaries, Mark P. Nevitt
Georgia Law Review
Admiral James Stavridis collapsed in his chair, exhausted. The four-star Navy admiral had just finished a six-month whirlwind tour of over thirty nations, flying on a state-of-the-art military aircraft surrounded by an enormous staff. He met with leaders from every member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), the heads of Russia and Israel, and several prospective U.S. and NATO allies. Not surprisingly, he met with each nation’s senior military leaders and ministers of defense in an effort to strengthen military-to-military relations and reinforce the bonds of the Atlantic Alliance that date back to General Eisenhower and the end of …
Constitutional Protections Of Property Interests In Western Water, James L. Huffman, Hertha L. Lund, Christopher T. Scoones
Constitutional Protections Of Property Interests In Western Water, James L. Huffman, Hertha L. Lund, Christopher T. Scoones
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
Indigenous Law At The Supreme Court Of Canada, Russell Brown
Indigenous Law At The Supreme Court Of Canada, Russell Brown
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Cure Worse Than The Disease? The Impact Of Removal On Children And Their Families, Vivek Sankaran, Christopher Church, Monique Mitchell
A Cure Worse Than The Disease? The Impact Of Removal On Children And Their Families, Vivek Sankaran, Christopher Church, Monique Mitchell
Marquette Law Review
Removing children from their parents is child welfare’s most drastic
intervention. Research clearly establishes the profound and irreparable
damage family separation can inflict on children and their parents. To ensure
that this intervention is only used when necessary, a complex web of state and
federal constitutional principles, statutes, administrative regulations, judicial
decisions, and agency policies govern the removal decision. Central to these
authorities is the presumption that a healthy and robust child welfare system
keeps families together, protects children from harm, and centers on the needs
of children and their parents.
Yet, research and practice—supported by administrative data—paint a
different …
The Procedure Fetish, Nicholas Bagley
The Procedure Fetish, Nicholas Bagley
Michigan Law Review
The strict procedural rules that characterize modern administrative law are said to be necessary to sustain the fragile legitimacy of a powerful and constitutionally suspect administrative state. We are likewise told that they are essential to public accountability because they prevent factional interests from capturing agencies. Yet the legitimacy-and-accountability narrative at the heart of administrative law is both overdrawn and harmful. Procedural rules have a role to play in preserving legitimacy and discouraging capture, but they advance those goals more obliquely than is commonly assumed and may exacerbate the very problems they aim to fix. This Article aims to draw …
Taxing Combat, Samuel Kan
Taxing Combat, Samuel Kan
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
When you are being shot at or dodging landmines you are in a combat zone. Diplomatic niceties aside, these brave warriors are in danger because of the policies of their Government and we must take care of them. Quite frankly, we must act to insure that we do not have a repeat of what happened in Somalia. In Somalia, the families of the soldiers who lost their lives could not receive the benefits that should have gone to them under the Tax Code because the President never declared it a combat zone.
We don’t know exactly where we’re at in …
Predetermined? The Prospect Of Social Determinant-Based Section 1115 Waivers After Stewart V. Azar, Griffin Schoenbaum
Predetermined? The Prospect Of Social Determinant-Based Section 1115 Waivers After Stewart V. Azar, Griffin Schoenbaum
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
Section 1115 of the Social Security Act allows the Secretary of Health and Human Services (the “Secretary”) to waive some of Medicaid’s requirements so states can enact “demonstration projects.” A demonstration project is an experiment a state can conduct by modifying aspects of its Medicaid program. To waive Medicaid’s requirements for this purpose, the Secretary must determine that the proposed demonstration project will likely assist in promoting Medicaid’s objectives.
Using this standard, President Trump’s Secretary has approved waiver requests to enact demonstration projects that contain “community engagement” requirements. The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia has heard each …
Alternative Remedies For Undocumented Workers Left Behind In A Post-Hoffman Plastic Era, Rachel S. Steber
Alternative Remedies For Undocumented Workers Left Behind In A Post-Hoffman Plastic Era, Rachel S. Steber
Catholic University Law Review
Congress enacted the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) in 1935 in order to level the bargaining power of employees and employers to prevent burdening the flow of commerce and depressing workers’ wages. The NLRA vests the administration of promulgating the goals of the NLRA in the National Labor Relations Board (Board), broadly stating that the Board should take such affirmative action as necessary to effectuate the policies of the Act.
In 1935, however, Congress could not predict the future demographic makeup of the American workforce, and in its definition of an “employee” as covered under the NLRA, the statute makes …
Crystal Clear Vagueness: The Board Of Immigration Appeals Hampers Justice With Its Vague “Process Of Justice”, Maria Natera
Crystal Clear Vagueness: The Board Of Immigration Appeals Hampers Justice With Its Vague “Process Of Justice”, Maria Natera
Catholic University Law Review
The Immigration and Nationality Act has caused the issue of unconstitutional vagueness to become more prominent in recent years in the context of immigration law. The Act provides definitions for certain crimes that are grounds for legal immigrants to be placed in removal proceedings, with the possibility of deportation. With such severe potential consequences, it is crucial that the definitions be crystal clear on what every crime entails in order to give immigrants fair warning.
One such crime that may subject an immigrant to removal proceedings and deportation is a conviction for an “aggravated felony,” coupled with a sentence of …
An Evolutionary Theory Of Administrative Law, Karrigan S. Bork
An Evolutionary Theory Of Administrative Law, Karrigan S. Bork
SMU Law Review
Law evolves to accommodate change—this is axiomatic in most academic legal traditions. But in the era of the administrative state, with congressional gridlock and a judiciary hesitant to address policy questions, evolution of statutory law has become much more difficult. This leads to pent up demand for change in legal regimes. If the legislature and the courts cannot provide an outlet for this pressure, where does it go? How does the law continue to change? Although other scholars have looked to agencies as engines of legal change, we lack a theoretical framework to understand how that change happens. I argue …
Calling A Spade, A Spade: Infirmities Facing Bump Stock Regulation Under The National Firearms Act, William Tyler Gilbert
Calling A Spade, A Spade: Infirmities Facing Bump Stock Regulation Under The National Firearms Act, William Tyler Gilbert
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Eu’S Struggles With Collective Action For Securities Fraud: An American Perspective, Dan Morrissey
The Eu’S Struggles With Collective Action For Securities Fraud: An American Perspective, Dan Morrissey
Texas A&M Law Review
Notwithstanding the apparent exit of the United Kingdom, the European Union (“EU”) has grown in membership and power since its modest beginnings after World War II, now rivaling the U.S. in economic strength. With the goal of promoting the security and prosperity of all the citizens of the countries that belong to it, the EU is pressing ahead to adopt laws that will promote their political and financial integration. Along those lines, it has also recently acknowledged a deficiency in the legal systems of its member states when it comes to allowing collective actions for victims of various types of …
Billion Dollar Orphans: Tension Between The Legal Intent And Social Purpose Of The Orphan Drug Act, John Sheridan
Billion Dollar Orphans: Tension Between The Legal Intent And Social Purpose Of The Orphan Drug Act, John Sheridan
Texas A&M Law Review
This Comment examines the extent to which Congress empowered the FDA to address the increase in petitions and the general accessibility of orphan drug remedies. Specifically, this Comment seeks to understand why the FDA’s interpretation of the purpose of the ODA seems to conflict with the statutory intent as interpreted by federal courts. This Comment considers a statute’s ultimate goal or social purpose to be the purpose of the statute, whereas the express mechanisms by which Congress seeks to bring about these goals is best understood as the statute’s intent. To understand the FDA and judiciary’s differing interpretations of the …
Massachusetts Lobstermen’S Association V. Ross, Daniel Brister
Massachusetts Lobstermen’S Association V. Ross, Daniel Brister
Public Land & Resources Law Review
President Obama established the first––and only––national monument in the Atlantic Ocean on September 15, 2016. Located 130 miles southeast of Cape Cod, Massachusetts, and comprised of 4,913 square miles of marine ecosystems rich in biodiversity, the protected area includes four underwater mountains and three submarine canyons. Plaintiff commercial lobster and fishing associations, seeking to overturn the designation, asserted that the Antiquities Act does not permit a president to establish marine national monuments. The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia disagreed, upholding a president’s authority to protect offshore areas and vast ecosystems as objects of scientific interest, and dismissing …
Mdl As Public Administration, David L. Noll
Mdl As Public Administration, David L. Noll
Michigan Law Review
From the Deepwater Horizon disaster to the opioid crisis, multidistrict litigation—or simply MDL—has become the preeminent forum for devising solutions to the most difficult problems in the federal courts. MDL works by refusing to follow a regular procedural playbook. Its solutions are case specific, evolving, and ad hoc. This very flexibility, however, provokes charges that MDL violates basic requirements of the rule of law.
At the heart of these charges is the assumption that MDL is simply a larger version of the litigation that takes place every day in federal district courts. But MDL is not just different in scale …
Dot Final Rule On Air Charter Brokers: Paving The Way For The “Uberization” Of Private Air Travel, Jet Mcguire
Dot Final Rule On Air Charter Brokers: Paving The Way For The “Uberization” Of Private Air Travel, Jet Mcguire
Journal of Air Law and Commerce
No abstract provided.
Wotus: The Water Definition Battle That Defines The Nation, Kole W. Kelley, Cassandra N. Bantz
Wotus: The Water Definition Battle That Defines The Nation, Kole W. Kelley, Cassandra N. Bantz
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Winter Of Discontent: A Circumscribed Chevron, Nicholas R. Bednar
The Winter Of Discontent: A Circumscribed Chevron, Nicholas R. Bednar
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
Are Administrative Law Judges Officers Of The State: Constitutional Considerations In The Selection And Tenure Of Administrative Law, Eric H. Miller
Are Administrative Law Judges Officers Of The State: Constitutional Considerations In The Selection And Tenure Of Administrative Law, Eric H. Miller
St. Thomas Law Review
One of the hallmarks of the Florida Administrative Procedure Act is the creation of a pool of hearing officers independent from any agency or the direct control of any political figure. Since its substantial revision in 1974, the statute has always provided for the selection and hiring of administrative law judges ("ALJ") by the Director of the Division of Administrative Hearings. ALJs hear almost every type of case, from licensure denials to environmental permitting challenges. In most cases, the ALJ weighs the evidence and legal arguments before recommending findings of fact, conclusions of law, and proposed final disposition to the …
Auer Deference Should Be Dead; Long Live Seminole Rock Deference, John B. Meisel
Auer Deference Should Be Dead; Long Live Seminole Rock Deference, John B. Meisel
Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology
Deference doctrines should be understood in light of the Administrative Procedures Act’s distinction between legislative rules and interpretive rules and should be based on a solid theoretical foundation. Modern Auer deference calls for categorical deference for an agency’s regulatory interpretation of an ambiguous regulation. This is inconsistent with the APA’s characterization of the purpose of an interpretive rule. Properly construed, interpretive rules clarify the meaning of a legal text which should be justified by use of expository reasoning. These rules deserve a lesser form of deference (Skidmore deference), based on an agency’s unique understanding of its own regulations which …
The Government Should Not Always Win: I.R.S. Practices That Verge On Unconstitutional Practices, Kayla Kendrick Odom
The Government Should Not Always Win: I.R.S. Practices That Verge On Unconstitutional Practices, Kayla Kendrick Odom
Barry Law Review
No abstract provided.