Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (24)
- University of Colorado Law School (18)
- American University Washington College of Law (3)
- Boston University School of Law (3)
- Columbia Law School (3)
-
- Florida State University College of Law (3)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3)
- Cornell University Law School (2)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (2)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (2)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (1)
- University of Maine School of Law (1)
- University of New Hampshire (1)
- Western New England University School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Ohio (24)
- State law; State administrative decision; (17)
- United States (13)
- State law; State administrative decision (7)
- NEPA (6)
-
- Bureau of Reclamation (5)
- Flood control (5)
- West (5)
- Endangered Species Act (4)
- Hydropower (4)
- Irrigation (4)
- Recreation (4)
- Administrative Law (3)
- California (3)
- Chevron (3)
- Colorado (3)
- FERC (3)
- FPA (3)
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (3)
- Federal Power Act (3)
- Instream flows (3)
- National Environmental Policy Act (3)
- Navigation (3)
- Adaptive management (2)
- Administrative law (2)
- Agency (2)
- Army Corps of Engineers (2)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (2)
- Coal (2)
- Competition (2)
Articles 31 - 60 of 70
Full-Text Articles in Law
Appeal No. 0605: Blaze Oil & Gas, Inc. V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0605: Blaze Oil & Gas, Inc. V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 96-280
Assessing Consensus: The Promise And Performance Of Negotiated Rulemaking, Cary Coglianese
Assessing Consensus: The Promise And Performance Of Negotiated Rulemaking, Cary Coglianese
All Faculty Scholarship
Over its thirteen year history, the negotiated rulemaking process has yielded only thirty-five final administrative rules. By comparison, the federal government publishes over 3,000 final rules each year through the ordinary notice-and- comment process. Why have federal agencies relied so little on negotiated rulemaking? I examine this question by assessing the impact of negotiating rulemaking on its two major purposes: (1) reducing rulemaking time; and (2) decreasing the amount of litigation over agency rules. My analysis suggests that the asserted problems used to justify negotiated rulemaking have been overstated and that the limitations of negotiated rulemaking have been understated. Negotiated …
Appeal No. 0594: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0594: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 96-206
Appeal No. 0579: Raymond Branham V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0579: Raymond Branham V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 95-49
Appeal No. 0581: Roger Blodgett V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0581: Roger Blodgett V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 96-28
Appeal No. 0596: Hanley Hardin V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0596: Hanley Hardin V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 96-215
Appeal No. 0597: Halwell Company V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0597: Halwell Company V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 96-208
Appeal No. 0599: Charlebois Energy Production V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0599: Charlebois Energy Production V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 96-245
Appeal No. 0595: Halwell Company V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0595: Halwell Company V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 96-199
Appeal No. 0598: Halwell Company (Bt Energy Corporation) V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0598: Halwell Company (Bt Energy Corporation) V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 96-209
Appeal No. 0551: John G. Oliver V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0551: John G. Oliver V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 93-336
Appeal No. 0588: Lor-San Oil Company V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0588: Lor-San Oil Company V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 96-152
Appeal No. 0593: Bt Energy Corporation (Halwell Co.) V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0593: Bt Energy Corporation (Halwell Co.) V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 96-197 and 96-209
Appeal No. 0600: Olney Friends School, Inc., V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Appeal No. 0600: Olney Friends School, Inc., V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 96-254
Reviewing Agency Action For Inconsistency With Prior Rules And Regulations, Harold J. Krent
Reviewing Agency Action For Inconsistency With Prior Rules And Regulations, Harold J. Krent
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Analyzing Government Regulation, Joseph P. Tomain, Sidney A. Shapiro
Analyzing Government Regulation, Joseph P. Tomain, Sidney A. Shapiro
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
Pervasive government regulation, together with its general unpopularity, poses important questions for our polity: Can sense be made out of the seeming chaos of government programs? What are the costs and benefits of government regulation? Is the regulatory state effective in mitigating the economic and social problems that it addresses? Although administrative law scholars recognize these issues, most respond with process reforms, such as greater executive oversight or new methods of statutory interpretation, rather than by articulating substantive answers concerning what should be the substantive goals and norms of the regulatory state. Moreover, law school curricula usually ignore these systemic …
Textualism's Selective Canons Of Statutory Construction: Reinvigorating Individual Liberties, Legislative Authority, And Deference To Executive Agencies, Bradford Mank
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
This Article demonstrates that textualist Judges, most notably Justices Scalia, Thomas, and, to a lesser extent, Kennedy, have applied some canons too aggressively, and slighted others. Textualist Judges have overused clear-statement rules that narrow statutory meaning, especially as a means to promote federalism and states' rights. On the other hand, textualists have neglected canons that promote individual liberty or executive authority Because canons must be applied on a case-by-case basis and different canons can conflict, it is impossible to formulate one rule for how they should be applied. Nevertheless, the common textualist approach of selectively favoring some canons at the …
Child Care Policy And The Welfare Reform Act, Peter R. Pitegoff
Child Care Policy And The Welfare Reform Act, Peter R. Pitegoff
Faculty Publications
This article sketches the 1996 Welfare Reform Act's major changes with particular attention to federally subsidized child care for low-income families.
Shareholder Enforced Market Discipline: How Much Is Too Much?, Eric J. Gouvin
Shareholder Enforced Market Discipline: How Much Is Too Much?, Eric J. Gouvin
Faculty Scholarship
This Article considers the federal banking regulation regime implemented in response to the widespread bank failures of the 1980s and early 1990s. The first section of the Article examines the moral hazard problem created by the presence of the deposit insurance scheme and the market discipline debate that has attempted to correct the moral hazard problem. The Author argues that the law has evolved to make bank holding companies the primary enforcers of market discipline. The Article’s second section examines the specific regulatory changes that have been designed to create an incentive for bank holding companies to impose discipline on …
Using Citizen Suits To Protect Biodiversity, William Snape
Using Citizen Suits To Protect Biodiversity, William Snape
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
INTRODUCTION: Over the past several decades, environmental advocates have expended enormous effort attempting to pass laws that protect air, water, land and species.' But even the best written laws will not be effective unless they are implemented. At the federal level, most modern environmental statutes include enforcement mechanisms that allow for the active involvement of the public. The most common of these are provisions authorizing citizen suits and public comments on proposed agency actions. The rationale for this public involvement is simply that federal agencies sometimes do not enforce or obey the laws they are charged to uphold. For instance, …
California Administrative Procedure Act. Administrative Adjudication, Office Of Administrative Hearings
California Administrative Procedure Act. Administrative Adjudication, Office Of Administrative Hearings
California Agencies
No abstract provided.
Demystifying Deossification: Rethinking Recent Proposals To Modify Judicial Review Of Notice And Comment Rulemaking, Mark Seidenfeld
Demystifying Deossification: Rethinking Recent Proposals To Modify Judicial Review Of Notice And Comment Rulemaking, Mark Seidenfeld
Scholarly Publications
No abstract provided.
Administrative Law In The 21st Century, Andrew Popper
Administrative Law In The 21st Century, Andrew Popper
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.
Playing Games With The Timing Of Judicial Review: An Evaluation Of Proposals To Restrict Pre-Enforcement Review Of Agency Rules, Mark Seidenfeld
Playing Games With The Timing Of Judicial Review: An Evaluation Of Proposals To Restrict Pre-Enforcement Review Of Agency Rules, Mark Seidenfeld
Scholarly Publications
No abstract provided.
Hard Look Review In A World Of Techno-Bureaucratic Decisionmaking: A Reply To Professor Mcgarity, Mark Seidenfeld
Hard Look Review In A World Of Techno-Bureaucratic Decisionmaking: A Reply To Professor Mcgarity, Mark Seidenfeld
Scholarly Publications
No abstract provided.
Judicial Restraint In The Administrative State: Beyond The Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Matthew D. Adler
Judicial Restraint In The Administrative State: Beyond The Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Matthew D. Adler
Faculty Scholarship
Arguments for judicial restraint point to some kind of judicial deficit (such as a democratic or an epistemic deficit) as grounds for limiting judicial review. ("Judicial review" is used in this Article to mean, essentially, the judicial invalidation of statutes, rules, orders and actions in virtue of the Bill of Rights, or similar unwritten criteria.). The most influential argument for judicial restraint has been the Countermajoritarian Difficulty. This is a legislature-centered argument: one that points to features of *legislatures*, as grounds for courts to refrain from invalidating *statutes*. This Article seeks to recast scholarly debate about judicial restraint, and to …
The Administrative Law Agenda For The Next Decade, Jeffrey Lubbers
The Administrative Law Agenda For The Next Decade, Jeffrey Lubbers
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.
The 1996 Revised Florida Administrative Procedure Act: A Survey Of Major Provisions Affecting Florida Agencies, Jim Rossi
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
In the spring of 1996, the Florida Legislature adopted a revised Administrative Procedure Act (APA),' the first massive overhaul of Florida's APA since its initial adoption over twenty years ago, in 1974. This Article examines the recent history of APA reform in Florida and surveys several provisions of the 1996 revised Florida APA that are likely to have a major effect on agency governance. Part II of this Article briefly reviews the recent history of regulatory reform in the state of Florida. Part III discusses an interesting innovation in Florida's 1996 APA revisions that governs agency waiver of rules and …
The Consent Of The Governed: Against Simple Rules For A Complex World, Cynthia R. Farina
The Consent Of The Governed: Against Simple Rules For A Complex World, Cynthia R. Farina
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
Professor Farina argues that recent proponents of enhanced presidential power overstate the ability of the President to legitimize the regulatory state. It accuses pro-presidentialists of premising their claims on a conception of the "will of the people" that is neither an accurate description of how citizens actually participate in modern government nor an authentic constitutional understanding of how citizens would consent to public policy decisions. The paper concludes by insisting that no single mode of democratic legitimization can "save" the regulatory enterprise; rather, administrative law must look to a plurality of institutions and practices that contribute to an ongoing process …
The Arrow Of The Law In Modern Administrative States: Using Complexity Theory To Reveal The Diminishing Returns And Increasing Risks The Burgeoning Of Law Poses To Society, J.B. Ruhl, Harold J. Ruhl Jr.
The Arrow Of The Law In Modern Administrative States: Using Complexity Theory To Reveal The Diminishing Returns And Increasing Risks The Burgeoning Of Law Poses To Society, J.B. Ruhl, Harold J. Ruhl Jr.
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
This article is the third in my series of articles exploring the application of complex adaptive systems (CAS) theory to legal systems. Building on the model outlined in the first two installments (in the Duke and Vanderbilt law reviews), this work examines the "arrow" or direction of the legal system in the context of the administrative state. Drawing from diverse work such as Burke's study of history's nonlinearity and Tainter's classic study of the collapse of complex civilizations, we argue that the administrative state is becoming too resource intensive and burdened by a proliferation of rules.