Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- AI (1)
- Accuracy (1)
- Adjudicating by algorithm (1)
- Administrative law (1)
- Algorithmic governance (1)
-
- Artificial intelligence (1)
- Automation (1)
- Autonomous systems (1)
- Bias (1)
- Big data (1)
- Common carriage (1)
- Communications (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Decision-making (1)
- Digital government (1)
- Digital platforms (1)
- E-government (1)
- Empathy (1)
- First Amendment protections (1)
- Free speech (1)
- Machine learning algorithms (1)
- Monopoly power (1)
- Non-common-carriage services (1)
- Non-discriminatory access (1)
- Predictive analytics (1)
- Privacy (1)
- Public accommodations (1)
- Quasi-common carriers (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Right to exclude (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Computer Engineering
Administrative Law In The Automated State, Cary Coglianese
Administrative Law In The Automated State, Cary Coglianese
All Faculty Scholarship
In the future, administrative agencies will rely increasingly on digital automation powered by machine learning algorithms. Can U.S. administrative law accommodate such a future? Not only might a highly automated state readily meet longstanding administrative law principles, but the responsible use of machine learning algorithms might perform even better than the status quo in terms of fulfilling administrative law’s core values of expert decision-making and democratic accountability. Algorithmic governance clearly promises more accurate, data-driven decisions. Moreover, due to their mathematical properties, algorithms might well prove to be more faithful agents of democratic institutions. Yet even if an automated state were …
The First Amendment, Common Carriers, And Public Accommodations: Net Neutrality, Digital Platforms, And Privacy, Christopher S. Yoo
The First Amendment, Common Carriers, And Public Accommodations: Net Neutrality, Digital Platforms, And Privacy, Christopher S. Yoo
All Faculty Scholarship
Recent prominent judicial opinions have assumed that common carriers have few to no First Amendment rights and that calling an actor a common carrier or public accommodation could justify limiting its right to exclude and mandating that it provide nondiscriminatory access. A review of the history reveals that the underlying law is richer than these simple statements would suggest. The principles for determining what constitutes a common carrier or a public accommodation and the level of First Amendment protection both turn on whether the actor holds itself out as serving all members of the public or whether it asserts editorial …